CRAN Package Check Results for Package osDesign

Last updated on 2025-05-17 19:52:00 CEST.

Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 1.8 4.32 45.14 49.46 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 1.8 2.92 32.11 35.03 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 1.8 77.92 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 1.8 79.10 NOTE
r-devel-windows-x86_64 1.8 6.00 63.00 69.00 NOTE
r-patched-linux-x86_64 1.8 5.20 43.43 48.63 NOTE
r-release-linux-x86_64 1.8 4.36 42.74 47.10 NOTE
r-release-macos-arm64 1.8 26.00 NOTE
r-release-macos-x86_64 1.8 60.00 NOTE
r-release-windows-x86_64 1.8 4.00 66.00 70.00 NOTE
r-oldrel-macos-arm64 1.8 30.00 NOTE
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 1.8 42.00 NOTE
r-oldrel-windows-x86_64 1.8 5.00 62.00 67.00 NOTE

Check Details

Version: 1.8
Check: CRAN incoming feasibility
Result: NOTE Maintainer: ‘Sebastien Haneuse <shaneuse@hsph.harvard.edu>’ No Authors@R field in DESCRIPTION. Please add one, modifying Authors@R: c(person(given = "Sebastien", family = "Haneuse", role = c("aut", "cre"), email = "shaneuse@hsph.harvard.edu"), person(given = "Takumi", family = "Saegusa", role = "aut"), person(given = "Nilanjan", family = "Chaterjee", role = "aut"), person(given = "Norman", family = "Breslow", role = "aut")) as necessary. Package CITATION file contains call(s) to old-style personList() or as.personList(). Please use c() on person objects instead. Package CITATION file contains call(s) to old-style citEntry(). Please use bibentry() instead. Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc

Version: 1.8
Check: Rd files
Result: NOTE checkRd: (-1) ccPower.Rd:57: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup? 57 | The correspondence between \code{betaTruth} and \code{X}, specifically the ordering of elements, is based on successive use of \code{\link{factor}} to each column of \code{X} which is expanded via the \code{expandX} argument. Each exposure that is expanded must conform to a {0, 1, 2, ...} integer-based coding convention. | ^ checkRd: (-1) ccSim.Rd:70: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) ccSim.Rd:71: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) ccSim.Rd:72: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) ccSim.Rd:73: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) ccSim.Rd:74: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) ccSim.Rd:78: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup? 78 | The correspondence between \code{betaTruth} and \code{X}, specifically the ordering of elements, is based on successive use of \code{\link{factor}} to each column of \code{X} which is expanded via the \code{expandX} argument. Each exposure that is expanded must conform to a {0, 1, 2, ...} integer-based coding convention. | ^ checkRd: (-1) phaseI.Rd:55: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup? 55 | The correspondence between \code{betaTruth} and \code{X}, specifically the ordering of elements, is based on successive use of \code{\link{factor}} to each column of \code{X} which is expanded via the \code{expandX} argument. Each exposure that is expanded must conform to a {0, 1, 2, ...} integer-based coding convention. | ^ checkRd: (-1) tpsPower.Rd:67: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsPower.Rd:68: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsPower.Rd:69: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsPower.Rd:70: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsPower.Rd:71: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsPower.Rd:77: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup? 77 | The correspondence between \code{betaTruth} and \code{X}, specifically the ordering of elements, is based on successive use of \code{\link{factor}} to each column of \code{X} which is expanded via the \code{expandX} argument. Each exposure that is expanded must conform to a {0, 1, 2, ...} integer-based coding convention. | ^ checkRd: (-1) tpsSim.Rd:86: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsSim.Rd:87: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsSim.Rd:88: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsSim.Rd:89: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsSim.Rd:90: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsSim.Rd:96: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsSim.Rd:97: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsSim.Rd:98: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsSim.Rd:99: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsSim.Rd:100: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsSim.Rd:101: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsSim.Rd:102: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsSim.Rd:103: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) tpsSim.Rd:107: Lost braces; missing escapes or markup? 107 | The correspondence between \code{betaTruth} and \code{X}, specifically the ordering of elements, is based on successive use of \code{\link{factor}} to each column of \code{X} which is expanded via the \code{expandX} argument. Each exposure that is expanded must conform to a {0, 1, 2, ...} integer-based coding convention. | ^ Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-release-linux-x86_64, r-release-macos-arm64, r-release-macos-x86_64, r-release-windows-x86_64, r-oldrel-macos-arm64, r-oldrel-macos-x86_64, r-oldrel-windows-x86_64

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.