The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
Aerial creel surveys estimate total angler effort by conducting an
instantaneous count of anglers on the water from a low-flying aircraft.
Because the aircraft captures a snapshot of angler activity at a single
moment, the count must be expanded to total effort using the hours the
fishery is open (h_open) and the mean trip duration of
anglers on the water (L_bar). The basic estimator is:
\[\hat{E} = N_{obs} \times \frac{h_{open}}{v}\]
where \(N_{obs}\) is the observed (instantaneous) angler count, \(h_{open}\) is the number of hours the fishery is open per day, and \(v\) is the detection probability — the proportion of anglers present that are detected from the aircraft. The mean trip duration \(\bar{L}\) is estimated from ground interviews and enters the catch rate estimation step rather than the effort expansion step.
When not all anglers are visible from the air — for example, anglers
fishing under tree cover or in enclosed shelters — a visibility
correction adjusts the count upward. If observers detect only
85% of anglers present, the corrected effort estimate is scaled by \(1 / 0.85 \approx 1.18\), yielding a higher
and more accurate total. The visibility_correction argument
to creel_design() carries \(v\), and is required for an aerial design:
pass "none" to state explicitly that no correction
applies.
Field studies do not report \(v\) directly. The standard ground-truthing method reports the ratio
\[r = \frac{\text{ground count}}{\text{aerial count}}\]
which is greater than 1 whenever the aircraft
undercounts — Smucker et al. (2010) report \(r
= 2.69\) for shore anglers. Because
visibility_correction is a probability, convert before
supplying it:
\[v = 1 / r \qquad\text{so}\qquad r = 2.69 \;\longrightarrow\; v = 0.372\]
Passing \(r\) directly is rejected
by the (0, 1] check rather than silently accepted, because
the two parameterisations differ by a factor of \(r^2\) in the effort estimate.
\(v\) is estimated from paired
air–ground counts, and the standard field method reports its standard
error as routine output. Supply it as visibility_se — on
the same probability scale — and that uncertainty is propagated into the
effort SE. For an SE published on the ratio scale, convert with \(SE(v) = SE(r) / r^2\).
Because one estimate of \(v\)
divides every scaled count, it is a shared multiplier: its
contribution enters once at the total and does not shrink as more
flights are flown. Omitting visibility_se reports the
component as absent rather than as zero — a zero would be
indistinguishable from never having propagated it at all.
This vignette uses two built-in datasets representing a hypothetical summer walleye and bass fishery at a Nebraska reservoir in June-July 2024.
library(tidycreel)
data(example_aerial_counts)
data(example_aerial_interviews)
head(example_aerial_counts)
#> date day_type n_anglers
#> 1 2024-06-03 weekday 39
#> 2 2024-06-05 weekday 32
#> 3 2024-06-07 weekday 29
#> 4 2024-06-08 weekend 45
#> 5 2024-06-09 weekend 51
#> 6 2024-06-10 weekday 34
head(example_aerial_interviews)
#> date day_type trip_status hours_fished walleye_catch walleye_kept
#> 1 2024-06-03 weekday complete 3.4 3 2
#> 2 2024-06-03 weekday complete 3.2 0 0
#> 3 2024-06-03 weekday complete 2.5 0 0
#> 4 2024-06-05 weekday complete 4.9 1 0
#> 5 2024-06-05 weekday complete 2.2 1 0
#> 6 2024-06-05 weekday complete 2.3 1 0
#> bass_catch bass_kept
#> 1 0 0
#> 2 0 0
#> 3 0 0
#> 4 1 0
#> 5 0 0
#> 6 1 1
example_aerial_counts contains 16 sampling days (one
overflight per day), each recording an instantaneous count of anglers on
the water. Weekday counts range from 15 to 40 anglers; weekend counts
range from 40 to 80. The example_aerial_interviews dataset
contains 48 angler interviews (3 per sampling day) with trip duration in
hours_fished and catch by species.
Build an aerial survey design with creel_design(). The
h_open argument is required for aerial surveys — it
specifies the number of hours the fishery is open each day, which sets
the expansion factor for the instantaneous count.
# Build the survey calendar from the unique count dates
aerial_cal <- data.frame(
date = example_aerial_counts$date,
day_type = example_aerial_counts$day_type,
stringsAsFactors = FALSE
)
design <- creel_design(
aerial_cal,
date = date,
strata = day_type,
survey_type = "aerial",
visibility_correction = "none",
angler_ratio = 1,
angler_ratio_se = 0,
h_open = 14
)
print(design)
#>
#> ── Creel Survey Design ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
#> Type: "aerial"
#> Date column: date
#> Strata: day_type
#> Calendar: 16 days (2024-06-03 to 2024-07-06)
#> day_type: 2 levels
#> Counts: "none"
#> Interviews: "none"
#> Sections: "none"
#>
#> ── Aerial Survey Design ──
#>
#> Hours open (h_open): 14
#> Visibility correction: "none" (declared; SE is "NA")
#> Angler-to-people ratio: 1
#> Angler ratio SE: 0
The printed design confirms the survey type, h_open, and
the number of sampling days in each stratum.
Attach the aerial count data with add_counts(). The
n_anglers column is auto-detected as the count
variable.
design <- add_counts(design, example_aerial_counts)
#> Warning in svydesign.default(ids = psu_formula, strata = strata_formula, : No
#> weights or probabilities supplied, assuming equal probability
Aerial effort estimation requires interview data to be attached
before calling estimate_effort(), because the estimator
uses the mean trip duration (\(\bar{L}\)) from ground interviews to
confirm the expansion factor. Attach the interview data with
add_interviews(), then estimate total effort.
design <- suppressWarnings(add_interviews(
design,
example_aerial_interviews,
catch = walleye_catch,
effort = hours_fished,
trip_status = trip_status
))
#> ℹ Added 48 interviews: 48 complete (100%), 0 incomplete (0%)
effort <- suppressWarnings(estimate_effort(design))
print(effort)
#>
#> ── Creel Survey Estimates ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
#> Method: aerial_total
#> Variance: Taylor linearization
#> Confidence level: 95%
#> Effort target: sampled_days
#> Unit: angler-hours
#> Count-sampling SE: 658.3 (known, but se is `NA`)
#> within_day: 0 (known, but se is `NA`)
#> visibility: NA (unknown, so se is `NA`)
#> angler_ratio: 0 (known, but se is `NA`)
#>
#> # A tibble: 1 × 7
#> estimate se se_between se_within ci_lower ci_upper n
#> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <int>
#> 1 8918 NA 658. 0 NA NA 16
The estimate column is the projected total angler-hours
over the full survey period, and se_between quantifies
between-day variability in the instantaneous counts.
se, ci_lower and ci_upper are
NA, and that is the correct output for this design rather
than a gap in it. creel_design() above was given
visibility_correction = "none", which declares that no
detection study was done. The between-day component is known, but a
component of the total’s uncertainty is not, and a standard error that
silently omitted it would describe a survey more precise than this one.
NA says the uncertainty was never propagated;
0 would say it was measured and found to be nothing. The
next section supplies a correction and its standard error, and
the interval appears.
When aerial observers cannot detect all anglers on the water, the raw
count underestimates true effort. Supply a
visibility_correction to creel_design() to
account for this. A value of 0.85 means observers detected 85% of the
anglers actually present; the effort estimate is scaled up by \(1 / 0.85\).
Here the correction is accompanied by visibility_se, so
the reported effort SE includes the uncertainty in the correction itself
rather than treating 0.85 as exactly known.
design_corr <- creel_design(
aerial_cal,
date = date,
strata = day_type,
survey_type = "aerial",
h_open = 14,
visibility_correction = 0.85,
angler_ratio = 1,
angler_ratio_se = 0,
visibility_se = 0.04
)
design_corr <- add_counts(design_corr, example_aerial_counts)
#> Warning in svydesign.default(ids = psu_formula, strata = strata_formula, : No
#> weights or probabilities supplied, assuming equal probability
design_corr <- suppressWarnings(add_interviews(
design_corr,
example_aerial_interviews,
catch = walleye_catch,
effort = hours_fished,
trip_status = trip_status
))
#> ℹ Added 48 interviews: 48 complete (100%), 0 incomplete (0%)
effort_corr <- suppressWarnings(estimate_effort(design_corr))
print(effort_corr)
#>
#> ── Creel Survey Estimates ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
#> Method: aerial_total
#> Variance: Taylor linearization
#> Confidence level: 95%
#> Effort target: sampled_days
#> Unit: angler-hours
#> Count-sampling SE: 774.4 (included in se)
#> within_day: 0 (included in se)
#> visibility: 493.7 (included in se)
#> angler_ratio: 0 (included in se)
#>
#> # A tibble: 1 × 7
#> estimate se se_between se_within ci_lower ci_upper n
#> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <int>
#> 1 10492. 918. 774. 0 8522. 12462. 16
Comparing the two estimates: the corrected effort is higher than the uncorrected estimate because the visibility correction inflates the count to account for undetected anglers.
cat(
"Uncorrected effort:", round(effort$estimate[[1]], 0), "angler-hours\n",
"Corrected effort (v=0.85):", round(effort_corr$estimate[[1]], 0), "angler-hours\n"
)
#> Uncorrected effort: 8918 angler-hours
#> Corrected effort (v=0.85): 10492 angler-hours
Aerial designs use the same interview workflow as other
tidycreel designs. The catch rate estimator computes CPUE
(walleye per angler-hour) from the complete-trip interviews already
attached to the design.
catch_rate <- suppressWarnings(estimate_catch_rate(design))
#> ℹ Using complete trips for CPUE estimation
#> (n=48, 100% of 48 interviews) [default]
print(catch_rate)
#>
#> ── Creel Survey Estimates ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
#> Method: Ratio-of-Means CPUE
#> Variance: Taylor linearization
#> Confidence level: 95%
#> Unit: fish/party-hour
#>
#> # A tibble: 1 × 5
#> estimate se ci_lower ci_upper n
#> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <int>
#> 1 0.413 0.0601 0.295 0.531 48
estimate_total_catch() multiplies the CPUE estimate by
the total effort estimate to project total walleye catch over the survey
period.
total_catch <- suppressWarnings(estimate_total_catch(design))
print(total_catch)
#>
#> ── Creel Survey Estimates ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
#> Method: Total Catch (Effort × CPUE)
#> Variance: Taylor linearization
#> Confidence level: 95%
#> Effort target: sampled_days
#>
#> # A tibble: 1 × 5
#> estimate se ci_lower ci_upper n
#> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <int>
#> 1 251. 45.1 160. 341. 48
The delta-method standard error on total catch accounts for variance in both the effort estimate and the CPUE estimate.
The complete aerial survey workflow in tidycreel
consists of four steps:
creel_design(..., survey_type = "aerial", visibility_correction = v, h_open = N)
— define the survey with the required h_open expansion
factor and the required visibility_correction (a detection
probability, or "none" to declare that no correction
applies). Add visibility_se to propagate the correction’s
own uncertainty.add_counts(design, counts) — attach the instantaneous
angler count data from each overflight.add_interviews(design, interviews, catch = ..., effort = hours_fished, ...)
— attach ground interview data for catch rate estimation.estimate_effort(), estimate_catch_rate(),
estimate_total_catch() — run the estimators.All estimators return creel_estimates objects with point
estimates, standard errors, and 95% confidence intervals. Use
print() to display results.
Jones, C. M., & Pollock, K. H. (2012). Recreational survey methods: estimation of effort, harvest, and abundance. Chapter 19 in Fisheries Techniques (3rd ed.), pp. 883-919. American Fisheries Society.
Malvestuto, S. P. (1996). Sampling the recreational angler. Chapter 20 in Fisheries Techniques (2nd ed.), pp. 591-623. American Fisheries Society.
Pollock, K. H., Jones, C. M., & Brown, T. L. (1994). Angler Survey Methods and Their Applications in Fisheries Management. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 25. Chapter 12: Aerial counts.
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.