The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.

6. Miscellaneous

Edzer Pebesma

For a better version of the sf vignettes see https://r-spatial.github.io/sf/articles/

This vignette describes a number of issues that did not come up in the previous vignettes, and that may or may not be categorized as “frequently asked questions”. Readers are encouraged to provide entries for this vignette (as for the others).

What is this EPSG code all about?

EPSG stands for a maintained, well-understood registry of spatial reference systems, maintained by the International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (IOGP). EPSG stands for the authority, e.g. EPSG:4326 stands for spatial reference system with ID 4326 as it is maintained by the EPSG authority. The website for the EPSG registry is found at the epsg.org domain. Using 4326 instead of EPSG:4326 is allowed (EPSG is the default authority) but the latter form, EPSG:4326 is better (less ambiguous).

Why should we use OGC:CRS84 instead of EPSG:4326?

EPSG:4326 formally defines coordinate axes to be in the order latitude-longitude, but practically all data sources and software environments use longitude-latitude axis order. OGC:CRS84 is equivalent to EPSG:4326 except that it defines coordinate axis order longitude-latitude, removing this ambiguity so to speak. See also st_axis_order()

How does sf deal with secondary geometry columns?

sf objects can have more than one geometry list-column, but always only one geometry column is considered active, and returned by st_geometry(). When there are multiple geometry columns, the default print methods reports which one is active:

library(sf)
demo(nc, ask = FALSE, echo = FALSE)
nc$geom2 = st_centroid(st_geometry(nc))
print(nc, n = 2)
## Simple feature collection with 100 features and 14 fields
## Attribute-geometry relationships: aggregate (8), identity (6), NA's (1)
## Active geometry column: geom
## Geometry type: MULTIPOLYGON
## Dimension:     XY
## Bounding box:  xmin: -84.32385 ymin: 33.88199 xmax: -75.45698 ymax: 36.58965
## Geodetic CRS:  NAD27
## First 2 features:
##    AREA PERIMETER CNTY_ CNTY_ID      NAME  FIPS FIPSNO CRESS_ID BIR74 SID74
## 1 0.114     1.442  1825    1825      Ashe 37009  37009        5  1091     1
## 2 0.061     1.231  1827    1827 Alleghany 37005  37005        3   487     0
##   NWBIR74 BIR79 SID79 NWBIR79                           geom
## 1      10  1364     0      19 MULTIPOLYGON (((-81.47276 3...
## 2      10   542     3      12 MULTIPOLYGON (((-81.23989 3...
##                        geom2
## 1  POINT (-81.49823 36.4314)
## 2 POINT (-81.12513 36.49111)

We can switch the active geometry by using st_geometry<- or st_set_geometry(), as in

plot(st_geometry(nc))

st_geometry(nc) <- "geom2"
plot(st_geometry(nc))

Does st_simplify preserve topology?

st_simplify() is a topology-preserving function, but does this on the level of individual feature geometries. That means, simply said, that after applying it, a polygon will still be a polygon. However when two features have a longer shared boundary, applying st_simplify to the object does not guarantee that in the resulting object these two polygons still have the same boundary in common, since the simplification is done independently, for each feature geometry.

Why do my dplyr verbs not work for sf objects?

They do! However, many developers like to write scripts that never load packages but address all functions by the sf:: prefix, as in

i = sf::st_intersects(sf1, sf2)

This works up to the moment that a dplyr generic like select for an sf object is needed: should one call dplyr::select (won’t know it should search in package sf) or sf::select (which doesn’t exist)? Neither works. One should in this case simply load sf, e.g. by

library(sf)

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.