The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
This vignette illustrates how to select cases when calling
lavaan_rerun() from the package semfindr.
Instead of refitting the model n times, each time with each
case removed, it is possible to use some criteria to select cases to be
included in the analysis. This is useful when the time to fit a model is
long and/or the sample size is large. This can also be used together
with the approximate approach: Use the approximate approach to identify
potentially influential case and then compute the exact influence
statistics for these cases. See
vignette("casewise_scores", package = "semfindr") for
further information on the the approximate approach.
The sample data set pa_dat will be used for
illustration:
library(semfindr)
dat <- pa_dat
# Add case id
dat <- cbind(id = paste0("case", seq_len(nrow(dat))), dat)
head(dat)
#> id m1 dv iv1 iv2
#> 1 case1 0.32067106 1.4587148 0.2055776 -0.42187811
#> 2 case2 0.15360231 -0.3809220 0.1853543 0.15229953
#> 3 case3 0.35136439 -0.4886773 0.9151424 1.16670950
#> 4 case4 -0.56529330 -0.9766142 0.2884440 0.04563409
#> 5 case5 -1.60657017 -1.0948066 -0.5756171 -0.18184854
#> 6 case6 0.03143301 0.5859886 0.1420111 0.06286986The following model is fitted to the data set:
Suppose, for some reasons, users want to refit a model only with
selected rows removed. For example, only rows 1, 4, 15, and 18 should be
selected. This can be done using the argument to_rerun of
lavaan_rerun():
rerun_out <- lavaan_rerun(fit,
to_rerun = c(1, 4, 15, 18))
#> The expected CPU time is 0.04 second(s).
#> Could be faster if run in parallel.Only four reruns in the output:
rerun_out
#> === lavaan_rerun Output ===
#> Call:
#> lavaan_rerun(fit = fit, to_rerun = c(1, 4, 15, 18))
#> Number of reruns: 4
#> Number of reruns that converged (solution found): 4
#> Number of reruns that failed to converge (solution not found): 0
#> Number of reruns that passed post.check of lavaan: 4
#> Number of reruns that failed post.check of lavaan: 0
#> Number of reruns that both converged and passed post.check: 4
#> Number of reruns that either did not converge or failed post.check: 0
est_change(rerun_out)
#>
#> -- Standardized Case Influence on Parameter Estimates --
#>
#> iv1~~iv2 m1~iv1 m1~iv2 dv~m1 m1~~m1 dv~~dv iv1~~iv1 iv2~~iv2 gcd
#> 18 -0.023 -0.273 0.035 0.101 0.260 -0.046 0.043 -0.067 0.163
#> 15 0.008 0.001 0.003 -0.009 -0.070 -0.061 -0.070 -0.058 0.017
#> 4 0.006 -0.024 -0.003 0.022 -0.051 -0.044 -0.056 -0.070 0.014
#> 1 -0.013 0.024 -0.030 0.052 -0.037 0.017 -0.061 -0.056 0.013
#>
#> Note:
#> - Changes are standardized raw changes if a case is included.
#> - All stored cases are displayed.
#> - Cases sorted by generalized Cook's distance.If user supplied case IDs are used, then the value of
to_rerun should be a vector of these case IDs:
rerun_out <- lavaan_rerun(fit,
case_id = dat$id,
to_rerun = c("case1",
"case4",
"case15",
"case18"))
#> The expected CPU time is 0.04 second(s).
#> Could be faster if run in parallel.Only four reruns in the output. User supplied case IDs are used in the output:
rerun_out
#> === lavaan_rerun Output ===
#> Call:
#> lavaan_rerun(fit = fit, case_id = dat$id, to_rerun = c("case1",
#> "case4", "case15", "case18"))
#> Number of reruns: 4
#> Number of reruns that converged (solution found): 4
#> Number of reruns that failed to converge (solution not found): 0
#> Number of reruns that passed post.check of lavaan: 4
#> Number of reruns that failed post.check of lavaan: 0
#> Number of reruns that both converged and passed post.check: 4
#> Number of reruns that either did not converge or failed post.check: 0
est_change(rerun_out)
#>
#> -- Standardized Case Influence on Parameter Estimates --
#>
#> iv1~~iv2 m1~iv1 m1~iv2 dv~m1 m1~~m1 dv~~dv iv1~~iv1 iv2~~iv2 gcd
#> case18 -0.023 -0.273 0.035 0.101 0.260 -0.046 0.043 -0.067 0.163
#> case15 0.008 0.001 0.003 -0.009 -0.070 -0.061 -0.070 -0.058 0.017
#> case4 0.006 -0.024 -0.003 0.022 -0.051 -0.044 -0.056 -0.070 0.014
#> case1 -0.013 0.024 -0.030 0.052 -0.037 0.017 -0.061 -0.056 0.013
#>
#> Note:
#> - Changes are standardized raw changes if a case is included.
#> - All stored cases are displayed.
#> - Cases sorted by generalized Cook's distance.Users can select cases using their rankings on the Mahalanobis
distance computed using the regression-based residuals. This is possible
only for models with observed variables only (i.e., path models). This
is analogous to selecting cases based on their residuals in a multiple
regression model. A path model can have more than one endogenous
variable. The residuals of a case on all endogenous variables will be
computed (as differences between observed scores and implied scores
computed by implied_scores()), and the Mahalanobis distance
will be computed using these residuals.
This is done using the argument resid_md_top. Users
specify the top x cases on this distance to be selected for
refitting a model.
rerun_out <- lavaan_rerun(fit,
case_id = dat$id,
resid_md_top = 5)
#> The expected CPU time is 0.05 second(s).
#> Could be faster if run in parallel.Five cases were selected, as shown below:
rerun_out
#> === lavaan_rerun Output ===
#> Call:
#> lavaan_rerun(fit = fit, case_id = dat$id, resid_md_top = 5)
#> Number of reruns: 5
#> Number of reruns that converged (solution found): 5
#> Number of reruns that failed to converge (solution not found): 0
#> Number of reruns that passed post.check of lavaan: 5
#> Number of reruns that failed post.check of lavaan: 0
#> Number of reruns that both converged and passed post.check: 5
#> Number of reruns that either did not converge or failed post.check: 0
est_change(rerun_out)
#>
#> -- Standardized Case Influence on Parameter Estimates --
#>
#> iv1~~iv2 m1~iv1 m1~iv2 dv~m1 m1~~m1 dv~~dv iv1~~iv1 iv2~~iv2 gcd
#> case16 -0.019 0.052 -0.038 -0.237 -0.004 0.624 -0.049 -0.059 0.456
#> case43 0.236 -0.403 -0.263 -0.135 0.223 0.120 0.195 0.030 0.407
#> case65 0.133 0.152 0.191 0.363 0.076 0.161 0.000 0.046 0.241
#> case85 -0.066 -0.174 0.216 -0.119 0.335 -0.052 -0.031 -0.011 0.214
#> case61 0.004 -0.007 -0.021 -0.153 0.350 -0.031 -0.070 -0.070 0.157
#>
#> Note:
#> - Changes are standardized raw changes if a case is included.
#> - All stored cases are displayed.
#> - Cases sorted by generalized Cook's distance.Note that selecting cases by this method can miss some influential cases. As in multiple regression, a case that is influential on the results needs not be a case that is poorly predicted by the exogenous variables. Therefore, this method should be used with caution.
Users can select cases using their rankings on the Mahalanobis
distance computed using all observed variables. This is done using the
argument md_top. Users specify the top x cases on
this distance to be selected for refitting a model.
rerun_out <- lavaan_rerun(fit,
case_id = dat$id,
md_top = 5)
#> The expected CPU time is 0.05 second(s).
#> Could be faster if run in parallel.Five cases were selected, as shown below:
rerun_out
#> === lavaan_rerun Output ===
#> Call:
#> lavaan_rerun(fit = fit, case_id = dat$id, md_top = 5)
#> Number of reruns: 5
#> Number of reruns that converged (solution found): 5
#> Number of reruns that failed to converge (solution not found): 0
#> Number of reruns that passed post.check of lavaan: 5
#> Number of reruns that failed post.check of lavaan: 0
#> Number of reruns that both converged and passed post.check: 5
#> Number of reruns that either did not converge or failed post.check: 0
est_change(rerun_out)
#>
#> -- Standardized Case Influence on Parameter Estimates --
#>
#> iv1~~iv2 m1~iv1 m1~iv2 dv~m1 m1~~m1 dv~~dv iv1~~iv1 iv2~~iv2 gcd
#> case99 0.163 0.002 0.009 0.187 -0.070 0.033 -0.054 0.686 0.559
#> case51 -0.130 0.421 -0.057 0.094 0.089 -0.044 0.525 -0.056 0.492
#> case16 -0.019 0.052 -0.038 -0.237 -0.004 0.624 -0.049 -0.059 0.456
#> case87 -0.419 -0.011 0.019 0.101 -0.070 0.000 0.096 0.457 0.413
#> case43 0.236 -0.403 -0.263 -0.135 0.223 0.120 0.195 0.030 0.407
#>
#> Note:
#> - Changes are standardized raw changes if a case is included.
#> - All stored cases are displayed.
#> - Cases sorted by generalized Cook's distance.Note that selecting cases by this method can miss some influential cases (Pek & MacCallum, 2011). Unlike multiple regression, this distance is not a measure of leverage. For a path model, this distance used distances from the centroid on all observed variables, including exogenous variables and endogenous variables. For a model with latent factors, this distance is affected by both residuals and values predicted by the latent factors. Therefore, this method should be used with caution.
If feasible, it is recommended to refit a model once for each case,
such that the influential of all cases can be considered together. The
methods above are included when the processing time is slow and so only
selected cases are to be explored. For the final model(s),
lavaan_rerun() using all cases are recommended, to serve as
a final check on the sensitivity of the results to individual cases.
Pek, J., & MacCallum, R. (2011). Sensitivity analysis in structural equation models: Cases and their influence. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2), 202–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.561068
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.