The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
Residual balancing is a method of constructing weights for marginal
structural models, which can be used to estimate marginal effects of
time-varying treatments and controlled direct/mediator effects in causal
mediation analysis. Compared with inverse probability-of-treatment
weights (IPW), residual balancing weights tend to be more robust and
more efficient, and are easier to use with continuous exposures. This
package provides three main functions, rbwPoint(),
rbwPanel() and rbwMed(), that produce residual
balancing weights for analyzing point treatments, time-varying
treatments, and causal mediation, respectively.
Reference
You can install the released version of rbw from CRAN with:
install.packages("rbw")And the development version from GitHub with:
# install.packages("devtools")
devtools::install_github("xiangzhou09/rbw")The rbwPoint() function constructs residual balancing
weights for estimating the average effect of a point treatment. The
following example illustrates its use by estimating the average effect
of televised political advertisements (treat) on campaign
contributions (Cont) among 16,265 zipcodes in the 2004 and
2008 US presidential elections.
library(rbw)
# install.packages("survey")
library(survey)
# residual balancing weights
rbwPoint_fit <- rbwPoint(treat, baseline_x = c(log_TotalPop, PercentOver65, log_Inc, PercentHispanic, PercentBlack, density, per_collegegrads, CanCommute), data = advertisement)
#> Entropy minimization converged within tolerance level
# attach residual balancing weights to data
advertisement$rbw_point <- rbwPoint_fit$weights
# fit marginal structural model
rbw_design <- svydesign(ids = ~ 1, weights = ~ rbw_point, data = advertisement)
# the outcome model includes the treatment, the square of the treatment,
# and state-level fixed effects (Fong, Hazlett, and Imai 2018)
msm_rbwPoint <- svyglm(Cont ~ treat + I(treat^2) + factor(StFIPS), design = rbw_design)
summary(msm_rbwPoint)
#>
#> Call:
#> svyglm(formula = Cont ~ treat + I(treat^2) + factor(StFIPS),
#> design = rbw_design)
#>
#> Survey design:
#> svydesign(ids = ~1, weights = ~rbw_point, data = advertisement)
#>
#> Coefficients:
#> Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
#> (Intercept) 3.57549 2.79045 1.281 0.200095
#> treat 0.43986 1.70909 0.257 0.796901
#> I(treat^2) 0.01552 0.16555 0.094 0.925332
#> factor(StFIPS)5 -1.25821 1.07914 -1.166 0.243656
#> factor(StFIPS)6 64.54555 5.42773 11.892 < 2e-16 ***
#> factor(StFIPS)10 12.25245 6.06566 2.020 0.043403 *
#> factor(StFIPS)13 11.14059 2.98022 3.738 0.000186 ***
#> factor(StFIPS)17 20.98707 4.37924 4.792 1.66e-06 ***
#> factor(StFIPS)20 -1.89078 1.17473 -1.610 0.107516
#> factor(StFIPS)21 -1.75188 1.21534 -1.441 0.149469
#> factor(StFIPS)23 -2.07515 1.60297 -1.295 0.195489
#> factor(StFIPS)24 36.79553 8.26927 4.450 8.66e-06 ***
#> factor(StFIPS)25 48.39716 7.34165 6.592 4.47e-11 ***
#> factor(StFIPS)27 2.31899 2.11116 1.098 0.272027
#> factor(StFIPS)28 -0.11943 1.25105 -0.095 0.923948
#> factor(StFIPS)30 -4.49525 1.58284 -2.840 0.004517 **
#> factor(StFIPS)31 -3.16796 1.00206 -3.161 0.001573 **
#> factor(StFIPS)34 23.32090 4.04985 5.758 8.64e-09 ***
#> factor(StFIPS)36 29.47346 4.29735 6.859 7.21e-12 ***
#> factor(StFIPS)40 0.58593 1.16360 0.504 0.614588
#> factor(StFIPS)45 1.14183 1.46973 0.777 0.437230
#> factor(StFIPS)46 -4.75496 1.99265 -2.386 0.017033 *
#> factor(StFIPS)47 5.66276 1.84947 3.062 0.002203 **
#> factor(StFIPS)48 18.32801 2.37261 7.725 1.19e-14 ***
#> factor(StFIPS)50 -0.50451 1.93071 -0.261 0.793860
#> factor(StFIPS)56 2.17016 3.10951 0.698 0.485244
#> ---
#> Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
#>
#> (Dispersion parameter for gaussian family taken to be 13738.91)
#>
#> Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 2The rbwPanel() function constructs residual balancing
weights for estimating marginal effects of time-varying treatments. The
following example illustrates its use by estimating the effect of
negative campaign advertising (d.gone.neg) on election
outcomes (demprcnt) for 113 Democratic candidates in US
Senate and Gubernatorial elections.
# models for time-varying confounders
m1 <- lm(dem.polls ~ (d.gone.neg.l1 + dem.polls.l1 + undother.l1) * factor(week), data = campaign_long)
m2 <- lm(undother ~ (d.gone.neg.l1 + dem.polls.l1 + undother.l1) * factor(week), data = campaign_long)
xmodels <- list(m1, m2)
# residual balancing weights
rbwPanel_fit <- rbwPanel(treatment = d.gone.neg, xmodels = xmodels, id = id, time = week, data = campaign_long)
#> Entropy minimization converged within tolerance level
# merge weights into wide-format data
campaign_wide2 <- merge(campaign_wide, rbwPanel_fit$weights, by = "id")
# fit a marginal structural model (adjusting for baseline confounders)
rbw_design <- svydesign(ids = ~ 1, weights = ~ rbw, data = campaign_wide2)
msm_rbw <- svyglm(demprcnt ~ cum_neg * deminc + camp.length + factor(year) + office, design = rbw_design)
summary(msm_rbw)
#>
#> Call:
#> svyglm(formula = demprcnt ~ cum_neg * deminc + camp.length +
#> factor(year) + office, design = rbw_design)
#>
#> Survey design:
#> svydesign(ids = ~1, weights = ~rbw, data = campaign_wide2)
#>
#> Coefficients:
#> Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
#> (Intercept) 50.39769 2.52269 19.978 < 2e-16 ***
#> cum_neg 0.96579 0.45496 2.123 0.036143 *
#> deminc 17.04229 2.66426 6.397 4.62e-09 ***
#> camp.length -0.09085 0.06175 -1.471 0.144222
#> factor(year)2002 -5.57359 1.53081 -3.641 0.000425 ***
#> factor(year)2004 -6.22630 1.67340 -3.721 0.000322 ***
#> factor(year)2006 -1.51220 1.93697 -0.781 0.436751
#> office 0.02811 1.11988 0.025 0.980026
#> cum_neg:deminc -2.99678 0.65932 -4.545 1.49e-05 ***
#> ---
#> Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
#>
#> (Dispersion parameter for gaussian family taken to be 25.21453)
#>
#> Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 2In causal mediation analysis, the rbwMed() function can
be used to construct residual balancing weights for estimating the
controlled direct effect or the controlled mediator effect with a
marginal structural model. The following example illustrates its use by
estimating the controlled direct effect of shared democracy
(democ) on public support for war (strike) at
different levels of perceived morality of war (immoral) for
a sample of respondents in a survey experiment.
# models for post-treatment confounders
m1 <- lm(threatc ~ ally + trade + h1 + i1 + p1 + e1 + r1 +
male + white + age + ed4 + democ, data = peace)
m2 <- lm(cost ~ ally + trade + h1 + i1 + p1 + e1 + r1 +
male + white + age + ed4 + democ, data = peace)
m3 <- lm(successc ~ ally + trade + h1 + i1 + p1 + e1 + r1 +
male + white + age + ed4 + democ, data = peace)
# residual balancing weights
rbwMed_fit <- rbwMed(treatment = democ, mediator = immoral,
zmodels = list(m1, m2, m3), interact = TRUE,
baseline_x = c(ally, trade, h1, i1, p1, e1, r1, male, white, age, ed4),
data = peace)
#> Entropy minimization converged within tolerance level
# attach residual balancing weights to data
peace$rbw_cde <- rbwMed_fit$weights
# fit marginal structural model
rbw_design <- svydesign(ids = ~ 1, weights = ~ rbw_cde, data = peace)
msm_rbwMed <- svyglm(strike ~ democ * immoral, design = rbw_design)
summary(msm_rbwMed)
#>
#> Call:
#> svyglm(formula = strike ~ democ * immoral, design = rbw_design)
#>
#> Survey design:
#> svydesign(ids = ~1, weights = ~rbw_cde, data = peace)
#>
#> Coefficients:
#> Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
#> (Intercept) 2.74428 0.06255 43.875 < 2e-16 ***
#> democ -0.37399 0.09893 -3.780 0.000164 ***
#> immoral -1.36569 0.15082 -9.055 < 2e-16 ***
#> democ:immoral 0.09091 0.19782 0.460 0.645899
#> ---
#> Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
#>
#> (Dispersion parameter for gaussian family taken to be 1.384994)
#>
#> Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 2These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.