The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
A common situation in comparative linguistic data collection is that data is encoded as nominal (‘categorical’) attributes. An attribute is conceived as a finite list of possibilities, viz. the values of the attribute. Although this is of course a completely normal and widespread practice in data encoding, in comparative linguistics it is mostly not trivial to decide on the delimitation of the different values. There is often ample discussion about the best way to separate the attested variation into types (terms like ‘types’, ‘categories’ or ‘values’ will the considered as equivalent here), and in general there is often no optimal or preferred way how to define the different types.
In practice then, different scholars will often like to interpret data differently. One common wish is to be able to recode data that has already been categorised into types by another scholar. Note that such a recoding of course will never be able to easily split types, because for that goal a complete reconsideration of all underlying raw data is necessary, something that will not be further considered here.
Given any given nominal data set (like for example the WALS data, as included in this package), there are various transformations that are often requested, and that are reasonably easy to perform: merge values and split attributes. A third kind recoding, merge attributes is also possible, but needs a bit more effort. Furthermore, the actual recoding will consist of just a few lists of information, which allows for an easy way to share and publish the actual recoding decisions in the form of a recoding profile. To produce such profiles, a recoding template is proposed that can be used to quickly document any recoding decisions.
As an example, consider the following toy data frame with two
attributes size
and kind
.
data <- data.frame(
size = c('large','very small','small','large','very small','tiny'),
kind = c('young male','young female','old female','old male',NA,'young female'),
row.names = paste('obs', 1:6, sep='')
)
data
## size kind
## obs1 large young male
## obs2 very small young female
## obs3 small old female
## obs4 large old male
## obs5 very small <NA>
## obs6 tiny young female
The first kind of recoding to be exemplified here is to merge values.
The first attribute of in our data has four values: large
,
small
, very small
and tiny
.
Suppose we would like to merge the values small
,
very small
and tiny
into one value value
small
. What we have to do is to define a new attribute with
new values, and link the original values to our new values. In practice
such a recoding looks as shown below: a list with a new name for the new
attribute (attribute=
), names for the new values of this
attribute (values=
), the name of the original attribute
that is to be recoded (recodingOf=
), and the central
informatin for the recoding: the link-vector (link=
).
The link-vector has the same length as to the number of values of the
original attribute in the order as given by
levels(data$size)
viz. in this case .1 These four original
values are linked to the new values as specified in the link-vector: the
first original value is linked to the first new value (1), the second
original value is linked to the second new value (2), the third original
value to the second new value (2), etc. A zero in this link-vector is
designated for values that should not be linked (i.e. NA, but that does
not work in YAML, see below.)
The function recode
taked the original data and the
recoding-specification, and returns the new, recoded, data:
# Specifying a recoding
recoding <- list(
list(
recodingOf = 'size',
attribute = 'newSize',
values = c('large','small'),
link = c(1,2,2,2)
)
)
# Do the actual recoding and see the results
recode(recoding, data)
## newSize
## 1 large
## 2 small
## 3 small
## 4 large
## 5 small
## 6 small
The recoding-object has a doubly-embedded list structure, which might
seem superfluous, but this is because the example above only specifies a
single new attribute. To specify more than one attribute, simply various
such specification can be listed, as illustrated below. In the following
example, the second original attribute (kind
) is split into
two new attributes (gender
and age
), but such
a split is simply represented as two different ways of merging the
values. In total, our recoding example has now been extended to recoding
three different new attributes.
# Specifying the recoding of three different new attributes
recoding <- list(
list(
recodingOf = 'size',
attribute = 'size',
values = c('large','small'),
link = c(1,2,2,2)
),
list(
recodingOf = 'kind',
attribute = 'gender',
values = c('female','male'),
link = c(1,2,1,2)
),
list(
recodingOf = 'kind',
attribute = 'age',
values = c('old','young'),
link = c(1,1,2,2)
)
)
# Do the recoding and show it
newdata <- recode(recoding, data)
newdata
## size gender age
## 1 large male young
## 2 small female young
## 3 small female old
## 4 large male old
## 5 small <NA> <NA>
## 6 small female young
Combining various attributes into a singly new attribute works very
similar, only that there are multiple attributes specified at
recodingOf
. Note that there are various zeros in the
link-vector, specifying that some value-combinations are not to be
linked.
back_recoding <- list(
list(
recodingOf = c('size','age'),
attribute = 'size+age',
values = c('largeOld','largeYoung','smallOld','smallYoung'),
link = c(1,3,0,2,4,0,0,0,0,0)
)
)
recode(back_recoding, newdata)
## size+age
## 1 largeYoung
## 2 smallYoung
## 3 smallOld
## 4 largeOld
## 5 <NA>
## 6 smallYoung
To get the indices (including zeros) of the link-vector right, one
has to realize that the recoding of two attributes is based on the
cross-section of the values from the two attributes, including possible
NAs. Internally, this uses the function expand.grid
,
leading in the current example to the following four values to be
recoded. For larger mergers (with multiple attributes, or with
attributes that have many values) this can become rather tedious,
because there are very many possible combinations that all have to
linked in the link-vector. For such situations it is possible to use the
option all.options = FALSE
in the recoding template (see
below) which results in only the attested combinations being listed.
This of course is not foolproof if the dataset is expanded after the
recoding profile is written. However, for non-changeable data this
option can be highly useful.
## Var1 Var2
## 1 large old
## 2 small old
## 3 <NA> old
## 4 large young
## 5 small young
## 6 <NA> young
## 7 large <NA>
## 8 small <NA>
## 9 <NA> <NA>
Specifying recodings is often rather tedious within R. Also, the
resulting nested list datastructure in R is not very insightful to share
or publish. As an alternative, I propose to use a YAML representation of
the recoding for editing and sharing. The function
write.recoding
can be used to produce a template that can
then be manually edited. All the necessary information for the recoding
will be included in the file.
The list of the attributes that one wants to recode should be
specified as a list in the function
write.recoding
. In that way it is possible to both recode
individual attributes, but also combinations of attributes. For example,
write.recoding(data = data, attributes = list(1, c(1,2)), file = file)
will write the following YAML information to file
. The
tildes ~
show the missing information to be added. Note
that the second recoding is a combination of two attributes.
The function recode
accepts a path to such a YAML-file
as an input of a recoding.
## title: ~
## author: ~
## date: '2024-06-08'
## originalData: ~
## selectRows: ~
## recoding:
## - recodingOf: size
## attribute: ~
## values:
## a: ~
## b: ~
## link:
## large: ~
## small: ~
## tiny: ~
## very small: ~
## newData: ~
## originalFrequency:
## large: 2
## small: 1
## tiny: 1
## very small: 2
## comments: ~
## - recodingOf:
## - size
## - kind
## attribute: ~
## values:
## a: ~
## b: ~
## link:
## large + old male: ~
## large + young male: ~
## small + old female: ~
## tiny + young female: ~
## very small + NA: ~
## very small + young female: ~
## newData: ~
## originalFrequency:
## large + old male: 1
## large + young male: 1
## small + old female: 1
## tiny + young female: 1
## very small + NA: 1
## very small + young female: 1
## comments: ~
As can be seen in the recoding template, it is best practice to use named linking. This works as follows:
Named linking is also extremely useful for merging of attributes. Repeating the example from above, but using names linking (note the sequence ‘space-plus-space’ in the key-names of the link. Also note the complete absence of any combination that should not be recoded and the unimportance of the order):
back_recoding <- list(
list(
recodingOf = c('size','age'),
attribute = 'size+age',
values = c( lo = 'largeOld'
, ly = 'largeYoung'
, so = 'smallOld'
, sy = 'smallYoung'
),
link = c( 'small + young' = 'sy'
, 'small + old' = 'so'
, 'large + young' = "ly"
, 'large + old' = 'lo'
)
)
)
recode(back_recoding, newdata)
## size+age
## 1 largeYoung
## 2 smallYoung
## 3 smallOld
## 4 largeOld
## 5 <NA>
## 6 smallYoung
Also note that this recoding looks much better and is easier to produce in YAML:
recoding:
- recodingOf:
- size
- age
attribute: size+age
values:
- lo: largeOld
- ly: largeYoung
- so: smallOld
- sy: smallYoung
link:
- 'small + young': sy
- 'small + old': so
- 'large + young': ly
- 'large + old': lo
It is of course also possible to just manually write a recoding
structure, either directly as a list within R or as a YAML-file. To make
this even easier, the function read.recoding
(used
internally in recode
as well) allows for various shortcuts
in the formulation of a recoding:
read.recoding
attribute
or link
) can be abbreviated,
and in practice the first letter suffices.link
and recodingOf
are minimally necessary.
New attribute and value names are added automatically when nothing is
specified. The automatically specified names are not very useful though
(they look like Att1
or Val4
). Manual
specification of names is strongly preferred.link
: When no link
is specified, the
original attribute from recodingOf
will simply be copied
verbatim, without any recoding.doNotRecode
to keep original
attributes: To add original attributes without recoding them it
is also possible to use doNotRecode=
(possible abbreviated
as d=
), followed by a vector with the column numbers of the
original data to be copied.To illustrate these possibilities, consider the following recoding of our toy dataset:
short_recoding <- list(
# same as first example at the start of this vignette
# using abbreviations and a different order
list(
r = 'size',
a = 'newSize',
l = c(1,2,2,2),
v = c('large','small')
),
# the same, using named linking
list(
r = 'size',
a = 'newSize',
v = list(a = 'large', b = 'small'),
l = list(tiny = 'b', 'very small' = 'b', small = 'b', large = 'a')
),
# same new attribute, but with automatically generated names
list(
r = 'size',
l = c(1,2,2,2)
),
# keep original attribute in column 2 of the data
list(
r = 2
),
# add three times the first original attribute
# senseless, but it illustrates the possibilities
list(
d = c(1,2)
)
)
recode(short_recoding, data)
## newSize newSize Att3 kind size kind
## obs1 large a val1 young male large young male
## obs2 small b val2 young female very small young female
## obs3 small b val2 old female small old female
## obs4 large a val1 old male large old male
## obs5 small b val2 <NA> very small <NA>
## obs6 small b val2 young female tiny young female
Note that this short_recoding would be really short and simple when written manually in YAML:
recoding:
- r: size
a: newSize
v: [large, small]
l: [1,2,2,2]
- r: size
a: newSize
v:
- a: large
- b: small
l:
- tiny: b
- very small: b
- small : b
- large: a
- r: size
l: [1,2,2,2]
- r: 2
- d: [1,2]
To document the recoding, it is to be preferred to expand all the
shortcuts to their full text. This can be done by using
read.recoding
. When file
is specified here,
then the result is written to a YAML file that can be easily shared or
published as documentation of the recoding.
## title: ~
## author: ~
## date: '2024-06-08'
## originalData: data
## recoding:
## - recodingOf: size
## attribute: newSize
## values:
## - large
## - small
## link:
## large: 1
## small: 2
## tiny: 2
## very small: 2
## originalFrequency:
## large: 2
## small: 1
## tiny: 1
## very small: 2
## - recodingOf: size
## attribute: newSize
## values:
## a: large
## b: small
## link:
## tiny: b
## very small: b
## small: b
## large: a
## originalFrequency:
## large: 2
## small: 1
## tiny: 1
## very small: 2
## - recodingOf: size
## attribute: Att3
## values:
## - val1
## - val2
## link:
## large: 1
## small: 2
## tiny: 2
## very small: 2
## originalFrequency:
## large: 2
## small: 1
## tiny: 1
## very small: 2
## - doNotRecode: kind
## - doNotRecode:
## - size
## - kind
The order of the levels is crucial when using a numerical link, and this order might be different depending on your locale! A more stable way is not to use a numerical link, but a named link, see below.↩︎
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.