The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
onionmat
in the onion
packageTo cite the onion
package in publications please use
Hankin (2006). This short document shows
how matrices with octonion or quaternion entries may be created and
manipulated with the onionmat
class of the
onion
R package.
onionmat
objectsA good place to start is function romat()
, which creates
a simple onionmat
object:
## [a,AL] [b,AL] [c,AL] [d,AL] [e,AL] [a,AK] [b,AK] [c,AK] [d,AK] [e,AK]
## Re 1.26 0.41 -0.0058 -1.15 0.25 -0.22 -0.057 -1.285 -0.43 0.99
## i -0.33 -1.54 2.4047 -0.29 -0.89 0.38 0.504 0.047 -0.65 -0.43
## j 1.33 -0.93 0.7636 -0.30 0.44 0.13 1.086 -0.236 0.73 1.24
## k 1.27 -0.29 -0.7990 -0.41 -1.24 0.80 -0.691 -0.543 1.15 -0.28
## [a,AZ] [b,AZ] [c,AZ] [d,AZ] [e,AZ] [a,AR] [b,AR] [c,AR] [d,AR] [e,AR] [a,CA]
## Re 1.76 -1.2 0.83 2.441 0.62 0.359 -0.81 0.248 -0.65 0.14 -0.80
## i 0.56 -1.1 -0.23 -0.795 -0.17 -0.011 0.24 0.065 -0.12 -0.12 1.25
## j -0.45 -1.6 0.27 -0.055 -2.22 -0.941 -1.43 0.019 0.66 -0.91 0.77
## k -0.83 1.2 -0.38 0.250 -1.26 -0.116 0.37 0.257 1.10 -1.44 -0.22
## [b,CA] [c,CA] [d,CA] [e,CA] [a,CO] [b,CO] [c,CO] [d,CO] [e,CO]
## Re -0.42 1.26 0.0084 -0.28 0.782 -1.13 -0.50 0.025 -1.12
## i -0.42 0.65 -0.8809 1.46 -0.777 0.58 1.68 0.027 0.34
## j 1.00 1.30 0.5963 0.23 -0.616 -1.28 -0.41 -1.680 0.49
## k -0.28 -0.87 0.1197 1.00 0.047 1.63 -0.97 1.054 0.14
## AL AK AZ AR CA CO
## a 1 6 11 16 21 26
## b 2 7 12 17 22 27
## c 3 8 13 18 23 28
## d 4 9 14 19 24 29
## e 5 10 15 20 25 30
This illustrates many features of the package. An
onionmat
object has two slots. The first slot,
x
, is an onion [a vector of quaternions or octonions] and
the second, M
, an integer matrix which is used to store
attributes such as dimensions and dimnames. The elements of
M
and d
are in bijective correspondence; thus
element [b,AR]
is number 17 and this is seen to be
approximately \(-0.81 + 0.24i -1.43j
+0.37k\). Most R idiom will work with such objects, here is a
brief sample.
## [1,1] [2,1] [3,1] [4,1] [5,1] [6,1] [7,1] [1,2] [2,2] [3,2] [4,2] [5,2]
## Re -0.12 -1.11 -1.2329 0.80 -1.23 0.741 -1.02 0.47 -0.097 -0.866 0.32 0.78
## i 0.20 1.58 -0.0037 -0.97 -0.96 0.069 -0.77 -1.18 2.370 0.583 -0.49 0.71
## j -1.07 1.50 1.5117 0.69 -0.87 -0.324 -1.12 1.47 0.891 -0.013 2.66 -0.54
## k -0.80 0.26 -0.4757 -0.96 -0.91 -1.087 -0.45 -1.31 -0.252 -0.375 1.68 0.89
## [6,2] [7,2] [1,3] [2,3] [3,3] [4,3] [5,3] [6,3] [7,3]
## Re -0.35 -0.29 -1.52 -0.07 0.53 -0.201 2.02 -1.064 -1.05
## i -1.01 -0.61 -0.21 -0.43 -0.09 1.102 -0.70 0.018 -0.90
## j 1.88 -0.95 -0.57 -0.59 0.16 -0.017 0.96 -0.390 1.27
## k -0.93 0.60 -1.39 0.98 -0.74 0.162 1.79 -0.491 0.59
## [,1] [,2] [,3]
## [1,] 1 8 15
## [2,] 2 9 16
## [3,] 3 10 17
## [4,] 4 11 18
## [5,] 5 12 19
## [6,] 6 13 20
## [7,] 7 14 21
See above how object A
has no rownames or colnames and
the defaults are used. We may extract components:
## [1] [2] [3]
## Re -0.12 0.47 -1.52
## i 0.20 -1.18 -0.21
## j -1.07 1.47 -0.57
## k -0.80 -1.31 -1.39
above, the resulting object is an onion but we may retain the
onionmat character using drop
:
## [1,1] [1,2] [1,3]
## Re -0.12 0.47 -1.52
## i 0.20 -1.18 -0.21
## j -1.07 1.47 -0.57
## k -0.80 -1.31 -1.39
## [,1] [,2] [,3]
## [1,] 1 2 3
The extraction methods operate as expected:
## [,1] [,2] [,3]
## [1,] -0.12 0.472 -1.52
## [2,] -1.11 -0.097 -0.07
## [3,] -1.23 -0.866 0.53
## [4,] 0.80 0.318 -0.20
## [5,] -1.23 0.780 2.02
## [6,] 0.74 -0.349 -1.06
## [7,] -1.02 -0.294 -1.05
## [,1] [,2] [,3]
## [1,] -0.80 -1.31 -1.39
## [2,] 0.26 -0.25 0.98
## [3,] -0.48 -0.37 -0.74
## [4,] -0.96 1.68 0.16
## [5,] -0.91 0.89 1.79
## [6,] -1.09 -0.93 -0.49
## [7,] -0.45 0.60 0.59
(above, the matrices returned are numeric). Also replacement methods work as expected:
## [1,1] [2,1] [3,1] [4,1] [5,1] [6,1] [7,1] [1,2] [2,2] [3,2] [4,2] [5,2]
## Re -0.12 -1.11 -1.2329 0.80 -1.23 0.741 -1.02 0.47 -0.097 -0.87 0.32 0.78
## i 0.20 1.58 -0.0037 -0.97 -0.96 0.069 -0.77 -1.18 2.370 0.58 -0.49 0.71
## j -1.00 -1.00 -1.0000 -1.00 -1.00 -1.000 -1.00 -1.00 -1.000 -1.00 -1.00 -1.00
## k -0.80 0.26 -0.4757 -0.96 -0.91 -1.087 -0.45 -1.31 -0.252 -0.37 1.68 0.89
## [6,2] [7,2] [1,3] [2,3] [3,3] [4,3] [5,3] [6,3] [7,3]
## Re -0.35 -0.29 -1.52 -0.07 0.53 -0.20 2.0 -1.064 -1.05
## i -1.01 -0.61 -0.21 -0.43 -0.09 1.10 -0.7 0.018 -0.90
## j -1.00 -1.00 -1.00 -1.00 -1.00 -1.00 -1.0 -1.000 -1.00
## k -0.93 0.60 -1.39 0.98 -0.74 0.16 1.8 -0.491 0.59
## [,1] [,2] [,3]
## [1,] 1 8 15
## [2,] 2 9 16
## [3,] 3 10 17
## [4,] 4 11 18
## [5,] 5 12 19
## [6,] 6 13 20
## [7,] 7 14 21
Some of the summary methods work:
## [1]
## Re -4.6
## i -1.7
## j -21.0
## k -3.2
Matrix multiplication is implemented.
A <- matrix(rquat(21),3,7)
umbral <- state.abb[1:7]
rownames(A) <- letters[1:3]
colnames(A) <- umbral
B <- matrix(rquat(28),7,4)
rownames(B) <- umbral
colnames(B) <- c("H","He","Li","Be")
A %*% B
## [a,H] [b,H] [c,H] [a,He] [b,He] [c,He] [a,Li] [b,Li] [c,Li] [a,Be] [b,Be]
## Re 4.6 0.18 -5.5 -7.29 4.37 4.1 5.1 6.38 -2.68 -6.1 4.6
## i -0.3 6.00 1.5 9.18 2.88 -3.4 3.1 -0.62 -7.79 2.9 4.4
## j -1.6 3.39 -2.1 4.62 -7.31 -1.2 1.4 -9.02 -0.91 16.4 -2.2
## k 2.0 -6.30 6.2 0.73 0.86 1.5 -8.1 7.01 0.59 1.1 -8.2
## [c,Be]
## Re -0.7
## i -16.7
## j -5.4
## k 2.5
## H He Li Be
## a 1 4 7 10
## b 2 5 8 11
## c 3 6 9 12
However, it is often preferable (but no faster in this case) to use
functions such as cprod()
and tcprod()
:
## [H,Jan] [He,Jan] [Li,Jan] [Be,Jan] [H,Feb] [He,Feb] [Li,Feb] [Be,Feb]
## Re 1.1 -0.052 1.14 6.4 3.088 -0.61 -0.18 2.9
## i 3.3 4.925 6.18 -6.1 -0.037 -5.63 -4.12 11.8
## j 6.2 -0.643 -0.55 -4.1 0.604 -14.81 -5.34 -5.8
## k -8.8 -2.366 -1.97 -2.0 5.096 -1.38 -0.29 -6.3
## Jan Feb
## H 1 5
## He 2 6
## Li 3 7
## Be 4 8
and indeed the single-argument versions work as expected:
## [a,a] [b,a] [c,a] [a,b] [b,b] [c,b] [a,c] [b,c] [c,c]
## Re 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
## i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
## j 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
## k 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
## a b c
## a 1 4 7
## b 2 5 8
## c 3 6 9
Here I consider \(3\times 3\)
Hermitian octonionic matrices which are known be a special case of a
Jordan algebra (see the jordan
package for more systematic
Jordan algebra R functionality).
## [1,1] [2,1] [3,1] [1,2] [2,2] [3,2] [1,3] [2,3] [3,3]
## Re 3.4e+01 -6.0 3.7 -6.0 2.9e+01 -7.0 3.7 -7.0 3.7e+01
## i 0.0e+00 6.9 12.7 -6.9 0.0e+00 -4.7 -12.7 4.7 0.0e+00
## j 0.0e+00 -4.6 -3.8 4.6 1.2e-16 2.1 3.8 -2.1 8.3e-17
## k 4.4e-16 3.5 -4.0 -3.5 -1.5e-16 -5.1 4.0 5.1 1.9e-16
## l 1.1e-16 -7.9 4.5 7.9 5.6e-16 -10.0 -4.5 10.0 -3.1e-16
## il 5.6e-16 3.4 -7.8 -3.4 -3.1e-17 -4.2 7.8 4.2 -1.8e-16
## jl 2.5e-16 4.6 2.1 -4.6 3.5e-18 2.2 -2.1 -2.2 -1.4e-17
## kl 0.0e+00 2.8 -3.8 -2.8 -9.0e-17 6.5 3.8 -6.5 3.3e-16
## [,1] [,2] [,3]
## [1,] 1 4 7
## [2,] 2 5 8
## [3,] 3 6 9
We see that x
is Hermitian symmetric:
## [1] 1.7e-15
[that is, the imaginary components of symmetrically placed elements are mutually conjugate]. We may verify that \(3\times 3\) matrices form a Jordan algebra under the composition rule \(A\circ B=(AB+BA)/2\) [juxtaposition indicating regular matrix multiplication]; the identity is
\[(xy)(xx) = x(y(xx)).\]
First we define the Jordan product:
then create a couple of random Hermitian octonionic matrices:
x <- cprod(matrix(roct(12),4,3))
y <- cprod(matrix(roct(12),4,3)) # x and y are 3-by-3 Hermitian octonionic matrices
We first verify numerically that the Jordan product of two Hermitian symmetric matrices is Hermitian:
## [1] 1.3e-13
then verify the Jordan identity:
LHS <- (x %o% y) %o% (x %o% x)
RHS <- x %o% (y %o% (x %o% x))
max(Mod(LHS-RHS)) # zero to numerical precision
## [1] 1.5e-10
showing that the Jordan identity is satisfied, up to a small numerical tolerance. However, \(4\times 4\) octonionic matrices do not satisfy the Jordan identity:
x <- cprod(matrix(roct(16),4,4))
y <- cprod(matrix(roct(16),4,4)) # x and y are 4-by-4 Hermitian octonionic matrices
LHS <- (x %o% y) %o% (x %o% x)
RHS <- x %o% (y %o% (x %o% x))
max(Mod(LHS-RHS)) # miles off
## [1] 263814
Above we have been using the default print method but it is possible to use a more compact notation, which is useful if a matrix has many short entries.
## [a,AL] [b,AL] [c,AL] [d,AL] [e,AL] [a,AK] [b,AK] [c,AK] [d,AK] [e,AK] [a,AZ]
## Re 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 -1 0 0
## i 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 -2 0 2 0
## j 0 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0
## k 0 -1 2 0 0 -2 -2 -1 0 0 0
## [b,AZ] [c,AZ] [d,AZ] [e,AZ] [a,AR] [b,AR] [c,AR] [d,AR] [e,AR] [a,CA] [b,CA]
## Re 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
## i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0
## j 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
## k 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0
## [c,CA] [d,CA] [e,CA] [a,CO] [b,CO] [c,CO] [d,CO] [e,CO]
## Re 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 -1
## i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
## j 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0 0
## k 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 -2
## AL AK AZ AR CA CO
## a 1 6 11 16 21 26
## b 2 7 12 17 22 27
## c 3 8 13 18 23 28
## d 4 9 14 19 24 29
## e 5 10 15 20 25 30
## AL AK AZ AR CA CO
## a 0 2i-2k 0 0 2-1i 0
## b -1k -2k 2 0 0 0
## c 2+2k 2-2i-1k 0 0 1 -1j
## d 0 -1 0 2k -1-1k 0
## e -1j 2i -2j 2k 0 -1-2k
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.