The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
library(nett)
Let us sample a network from a DCSBM:
= 1500
n = 4
Ktru = 15 # expected average degree
lambda = 0.1
oir = 1:Ktru
pri
set.seed(1234)
<- EnvStats::rpareto(n, 2/3, 3)
theta = pp_conn(n, oir, lambda, pri=pri, theta)$B
B = sample(Ktru, n, replace=T, prob=pri) # randomly smaple "true community labels"
z = sample_dcsbm(z, B, theta) # sample the adjacency matrix A
We can apply the (Laplacian-based) regularized spectral clustering for community detection:
= spec_clust(A, K=4) zh
We can evaluate the performance by computing the normalized mutual information (NMI) to a true label vector:
compute_mutual_info(z, zh)
#> [1] 0.8459515
NMI is in \([0,1]\) and the closer to 1 it is the closer the mathc between the two labels.
Let us now consider the effect of the expected average degree \(\lambda\) on the performance of spectral clustering.
We first generate from a simple planted partition model, with connectivity matrix, \[B_1 \propto (1-\beta)I_{K}+ \beta\mathbf{1}\mathbf{1}^{T}\] where \(\beta\) is the out-in-ratio.
set.seed(1234)
= 20
nrep = 12
nlam = 10^seq(log10(1), log10(50), length.out = nlam) # the vector of logarithmically spaced lambda
lamvec = expand.grid(rep = 1:nrep, lambda = lamvec)
runs
= do.call(rbind, lapply(1:nrow(runs), function(j) {
res = runs[j,"lambda"]
lambda = pp_conn(n, oir, lambda, pri=pri, theta)$B
B = sample_dcsbm(z, B, theta)
A = spec_clust(A, K = Ktru) # defaults to tau = 0.25 for the regularization parameter
zh = spec_clust(A, K = Ktru, tau = 0)
zh_noreg data.frame(rep = runs[j,"rep"], lambda = lambda,
nmi = compute_mutual_info(z, zh), nmi_noreg = compute_mutual_info(z, zh_noreg))
}))
= aggregate(res, by = list(res$lambda), FUN = mean) agg_nmi
The resulting plot looks like this:
plot(agg_nmi$lambda, agg_nmi$nmi, log="x",
type = "b", col = "blue", ylab = "NMI", xlab = "lambda", pch=19,
main="Specral clustering performance")
lines(agg_nmi$lambda, agg_nmi$nmi_noreg, col="red", lty=2, pch=18, type = "b")
legend(1, 1, legend = c("0.25 regularization","No regularization"),
col = c("blue","red"), lty=1:2, box.lty=0)
This shows that increasing \(\lambda\) makes the community detection problem easier.
Let us now generate the connectivity matrix randomly as follows \[B_2 \propto \gamma R + (1-\gamma) Q \] where
rsymperm()
), andThe function gen_rand_conn()
generates such connectivity
matrices.
set.seed(1234)
= 20
nrep = 12
nlam = 10^seq(log10(1), log10(200), length.out = nlam) # the vector of logarithmically spaced lambda
lamvec = expand.grid(rep = 1:nrep, lambda = lamvec)
runs
= do.call(rbind, lapply(1:nrow(runs), function(j) {
res = runs[j,"lambda"]
lambda = gen_rand_conn(n, Ktru, lambda = lambda, gamma = 0.1, pri=pri)
B = sample_dcsbm(z, B, theta)
A = spec_clust(A, K = Ktru) # defaults to tau = 0.25 for the regularization parameter
zh = spec_clust(A, K = Ktru, tau = 0)
zh_noreg data.frame(rep = runs[j,"rep"], lambda = lambda,
nmi = compute_mutual_info(z, zh), nmi_noreg = compute_mutual_info(z, zh_noreg))
}))
= aggregate(res, by = list(res$lambda), FUN = mean) agg_nmi
The resulting plot looks like the following:
plot(agg_nmi$lambda, agg_nmi$nmi, log="x",
type = "b", col = "blue", ylab = "NMI", xlab = "lambda", pch=19,
main="Specral clustering performance")
lines(agg_nmi$lambda, agg_nmi$nmi_noreg, col="red", lty=2, pch=18, type = "b")
legend(1, max(agg_nmi$nmi), legend = c("0.25 regularization","No regularization"),
col = c("blue","red"), lty=1:2, box.lty=0)
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.