The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.

observed variables in the LMS- and QML approach

library(modsem)

The Latent Moderated Structural Equations (LMS) and the Quasi Maximum Likelihood (QML) Approach

In contrast to the other approaches, the LMS and QML approaches are designed to handle latent variables only. Thus, observed variables cannot be used as easily as in the other approaches. One way to get around this is by specifying your observed variable as a latent variable with a single indicator. modsem() will, by default, constrain the factor loading to 1 and the residual variance of the indicator to 0. The only difference between the latent variable and its indicator, assuming it is an exogenous variable, is that it has a zero-mean. This approach works for both the LMS and QML methods in most cases, with two exceptions.

The LMS Approach

For the LMS approach, you can use the above-mentioned method in almost all cases, except when using an observed variable as a moderating variable. In the LMS approach, you typically select one variable in an interaction term as the moderator. The interaction effect is then estimated via numerical integration at n quadrature nodes of the moderating variable. However, this process requires that the moderating variable has an error term, as the distribution of the moderating variable is modeled as \(X \sim N(Az, \varepsilon)\), where \(Az\) is the expected value of \(X\) at quadrature point k, and \(\varepsilon\) is the error term. If the error term is zero, the probability of observing a given value of \(X\) will not be computable.

In most instances, the first variable in the interaction term is chosen as the moderator. For example, if the interaction term is "X:Z", "X" will usually be chosen as the moderator. Therefore, if only one of the variables is latent, you should place the latent variable first in the interaction term. If both variables are observed, you must specify a measurement error (e.g., "x1 ~~ 0.1 * x1") for the indicator of the first variable in the interaction term.

library(modsem)

# Interaction effect between a latent and an observed variable
m1 <- '
# Outer Model
  X =~ x1 # X is observed
  Z =~ z1 + z2 # Z is latent
  Y =~ y1 # Y is observed

# Inner model
  Y ~ X + Z
  Y ~ Z:X
'

lms1 <- modsem(m1, oneInt, method = "lms")

# Interaction effect between two observed variables
m2 <- '
# Outer Model
  X =~ x1 # X is observed
  Z =~ z1 # Z is observed
  Y =~ y1 # Y is observed
  x1 ~~ 0.1 * x1 # Specify a variance for the measurement error

# Inner model
  Y ~ X + Z
  Y ~ X:Z
'

lms2 <- modsem(m2, oneInt, method = "lms")
summary(lms2)

The QML Approach

The estimation process for the QML approach differs from the LMS approach, and you do not encounter the same issue as in the LMS approach. Therefore, you don’t need to specify a measurement error for moderating variables.

m3 <- '
# Outer Model
  X =~ x1 # X is observed
  Z =~ z1 # Z is observed
  Y =~ y1 # Y is observed

# Inner model
  Y ~ X + Z
  Y ~ X:Z
'

qml3 <- modsem(m3, oneInt, method = "qml")
summary(qml3)

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.