The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
This document is prepared automatically using the following R command.
library(interpretCI) |
The local baseball team conducts a study to find the amount spent on refreshments at the ball park. Over the course of the season they gather simple random samples of 500 men and 1000 women. For men, the average expenditure was $ 20, with a standard deviation of $ 3. For women, it was $15, with a standard deviation of $2. |
The approach that we used to solve this problem is valid when the following conditions are met.
The sampling method must be simple random sampling.
The samples must be independent.
The sampling distribution should be approximately normally distributed.
Since the above requirements are satisfied, we can use the following four-step approach to construct a confidence interval of mean.
Raw data is not provided.
Since we are trying to estimate the difference between population means, we choose the difference between sample means as the sample statistic. Thus,
\[\bar{x1}-\bar{x2}=20-15=5\]
In this analysis, the confidence level is defined for us in the problem. We are working with a 99% confidence level.
The standard error is an estimate of the standard deviation of the difference between population means. We use the sample standard deviations to estimate the standard error (SE).
\[SE=\sqrt{\frac{s^2_1}{n_1}+\frac{s^2_2}{n_2}}\] \[SE=\sqrt{\frac{3^2}{500}+\frac{2^2}{1000}}\] \[SE=0.148\]
\[DF=\frac{(\frac{s_1^2}{n_1}+\frac{s_2^2}{n_2})^2}{\frac{(s_1^2/n_1)^2}{n_1-1}+\frac{(s_2^2/n_2)^2}{n_2-1}}\] \[DF=\frac{(\frac{3^2}{500}+\frac{2^2}{1000})^2}{\frac{(3^2/500)^2}{500-1}+\frac{(2^2/1000)^2}{1000-1}}\]
\[DF=727.48\]
The critical value is the t statistic having 727.48 degrees of freedom and a cumulative probability equal to 0.99. From the t Distribution table, we find that the critical value is 2.331.
df | 0.4 | 0.25 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.025 | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.001 |
725 | -0.253 | -0.675 | -1.283 | -1.647 | -1.963 | -2.332 | -2.583 | -3.102 |
726 | -0.253 | -0.675 | -1.283 | -1.647 | -1.963 | -2.331 | -2.583 | -3.101 |
727 | -0.253 | -0.675 | -1.283 | -1.647 | -1.963 | -2.331 | -2.583 | -3.101 |
728 | -0.253 | -0.675 | -1.283 | -1.647 | -1.963 | -2.331 | -2.583 | -3.101 |
\[ qt(p,df)=qt(0.99,727.48)=2.331\] The graph shows that \(\alpha\) values are the tail areas of the distribution.
\[ME=critical\ value \times SE\] \[ME=2.331 \times 0.148=0.346\]
The range of the confidence interval is defined by the sample statistic - margin of error and the \(\infty\)(infinite). And the uncertainty is denoted by the confidence level.
Therefore, the 99% confidence interval is 4.65 to Inf. Here’s how to interpret this confidence interval. Suppose we repeated this study with different random samples for men and women. Based on the confidence interval, we would expect the observed difference in sample means to be between 4.65 and Inf 99% of the time.
You can visualize the mean difference:
plot(x)
call: meanCI.default(n1 = 500, n2 = 1000, m1 = 20, s1 = 3, m2 = 15, s2 = 2, alpha = 0.01, alternative = "greater")
method: Welch Two Sample t-test
alternative hypothesis:
true unpaired differences in means is greater than 0
Results
# A tibble: 1 × 6
control test DF CI t p
<chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr>
1 x y 727.48 5.00 [99CI 4.65; Inf] 33.71 < 2.2e-16
The contents of this document are modified from StatTrek.com. Berman H.B., “AP Statistics Tutorial”, [online] Available at: https://stattrek.com/estimation/difference-in-means.aspx?tutorial=AP URL[Accessed Data: 1/23/2022].
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.