The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.

Analyzing Egocentric Data: The ego_netwrite Function

The goal of the ideanet R package is to lower the barrier of entry to network analysis for students, entry-level scholars, and non-expert practitioners interested in relational measurement. Some researchers may have data and questions that are suitable to network analysis. And yet, getting comfortable with the tools available in R can prove to be an arduous and time consuming task. Moreover, network analysis in R can be far from straightforward: available tools in R are shared between several packages, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. This breadth of options can make it difficult to produce reliable results by making the correct function for a given measurement difficult to identify and, at worst, packages conflicting with each other and relying on different assumptions about the data. For many researchers, this can prove to be an effective deterrent when engaging in relational analysis. ideanet is a set of functions which leverages existing network analysis packages in R (igraph, network, sna) to provide high quality measurements seamlessly from the starting data.

This package, as part of the broader IDEANet project, is supported by the National Science Foundation as part of the Human Networks and Data Science - Infrastructure program (BCS-2024271 and BCS-2140024).

Egocentric Data Processing and Analysis

Local, or egocentric, networks describe the relationships that exist between a focal actor (called “ego”) and their contacts (referred to as “alters”). Depending on how these networks are collected, they may also describe relationships that exist between each of the focal ego’s alters. The figures below illustrate how ego networks appear when 1. only ties between an ego and its alters are recorded, and 2. when ties between alters are available:

Most egocentric data also contain information describing characteristics of ego and their alters at the individual level. Researchers often collect egocentric data when efforts to capture sociocentric networks are impossible or highly impractical, such as in studies of hard-to-reach populations.

While sociocentric datasets typically store a single, large network, egocentric data usually contain several smaller networks (hereafter ego networks) that may or may not exist in isolation of one another. Users applying ideanet to egocentric data can use the ego_netwrite function to generate an extensive set of measures and summaries for each ego network in their data. Although egocentric data can be stored in a variety of ways, ego_netwrite requires a specific format that we believe makes the representation of egos, alters, and the ties between them more intuitive. This format divides egocentric data into three items:

  1. An ego list containing information about various qualities and attributes of focal egos for each ego network. Each row in the ego list corresponds to a specific ego, which is given a unique ID number.
  2. An alter list in which each row corresponds to a specific alter in an ego network. The first column in the alter list indicates the ego for which a given alter is associated, values for which should match the unique ID numbers contained in the ego list. The second column indicates the given alter; within each ego network, alters are also given a unique ID number. Subsequent columns contain qualities and attributes of alters and/or attributes of the ego’s relationship to alter.
  3. (If available) An alter-alter edgelist in which each row represents an edge connecting one alter, i, to another alter j. If multiple types of relationships exist between i and j, each i-j-type combination is given its own row. The first column in this edgelist represents the ego whose network a tie appears in and values for which should match the unique ID numbers contained in the ego list. The next two columns represent the alters connected by a given tie and values for which should be unique ID numbers contained in the alter list. Any other columns contain attributes of the relationship between the two alters.

In some cases, users may have all the information contained in the above three items stored in a single, wide dataset. When this is the case, users may be able to use ideanet’s, ego_reshape function to split their data into these items. We recommend that users with such a dataset consult this function’s documentation:

?ego_reshape

Current Support and Limitations

As of initial release, ego_netwrite supports the processing of ego networks with directed ties (in which each tie has a distinct sender and receiver) and undirected ties (in which ties merely represent a connection between actors). The function also supports multirelational networks in which edges may represent one of several different types of relationships between actors.

However, ego_netwrite does not currently support the processing of edge/tie weights, which signify the strength of connections between actors. The function assumes that all ties in a dataset are of equal strength when calculating measures. At present, we recommend that users employ other tools for calculating measures based on weighted edges.

Additionally, some egocentric datasets contain networks in which nodes in one ego network may also appear in another. In these cases, it is possible to aggregate individual ego networks with shared nodes into broader, more sociocentric structures. Theoretically, one could use the alter list and alter-alter edgelist created by ego_netwrite to construct a larger network. However, ego_netwrite itself assumes that each ego network in a dataset exists independent of all others. We advise users interested in constructing larger structures from individual ego networks to use other tools (or write their own code) in order to do so.

Using ego_netwrite

To familiarize ourselves with ego_netwrite and other functions for ego networks, we’ll work with an example ego list, alter list, and alter-alter edgelist native to the ideanet package. These data are a simplified subset of ego networks collected in an online study using the “Important Matters” name generator question (NGQ). This question is frequently used to capture people’s close personal ties:

library(ideanet) 

# Ego list
ngq_egos <- ngq_egos
# Alter list
ngq_alters <- ngq_alters
# Alter-alter edgelist
ngq_aa <- ngq_aa

Let’s look over each of these data frames:

dplyr::glimpse(ngq_egos)
#> Rows: 20
#> Columns: 9
#> $ ego_id     <int> 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, …
#> $ age        <dbl> 41, 14, 35, 17, 43, 24, 12, 24, 44, 24, 12, 52, 26, 11, 18,…
#> $ sex        <dbl> 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2
#> $ race       <chr> "White", "Other", "White", "White", "White", "Other", "Whit…
#> $ black      <lgl> FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FAL…
#> $ white      <lgl> TRUE, FALSE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, FALSE, TRUE, FALSE, TRUE, TR…
#> $ other_race <lgl> FALSE, TRUE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, TRUE, FALSE, TRUE, FALSE,…
#> $ edu        <dbl> 5, 7, 7, 6, 7, 6, 7, 6, 6, 5, 4, 5, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6, 5, 5
#> $ pol        <dbl> 3, 2, 3, 3, 2, 3, 3, 3, 6, 3, 1, 7, 4, 3, 4, 1, 4, 5, 2, 1

Our ego list contains information for the 20 egos in our dataset. The ego list also has information regarding the age, sex, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, and political leanings of each ego.

dplyr::glimpse(ngq_alters)
#> Rows: 67
#> Columns: 14
#> $ ego_id     <int> 1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5,…
#> $ alter_id   <int> 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 1, 2…
#> $ sex        <dbl> 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 1,…
#> $ race       <chr> "White", "White", "White", "Black", "White", "White", "Whit…
#> $ white      <lgl> TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, FALSE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE…
#> $ black      <lgl> FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, TRUE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALS…
#> $ other_race <lgl> FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FAL…
#> $ pol        <dbl> 5, 7, 2, 1, 3, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 3, 2,…
#> $ family     <lgl> TRUE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALS…
#> $ friend     <lgl> FALSE, TRUE, FALSE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, FALSE, FA…
#> $ other_rel  <lgl> FALSE, FALSE, TRUE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALS…
#> $ face       <dbl> 5, 2, 4, 3, 1, 1, 3, 4, 5, 5, 3, 4, 4, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 5, 2,…
#> $ phone      <dbl> 5, 2, 4, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 4, 3, 3, 1, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 4, 2,…
#> $ text       <dbl> 5, 4, 4, 1, 5, 5, 2, 4, 5, 4, 4, 3, 4, 4, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 2,…

Just as described, the first column in the alter list is the ID number of the ego corresponding to each alter; the second column is the unique ID number for each alter within each ego network. In addition to information regarding the sex and race/ethnicity of each alter, this alter list contains dyadic data about the relationship between ego and alter. family, friend, and other_rel indicate whether an ego identified an alter as a family member, a friend, or another kind of relationship respectively. Further, the face, phone, and text columns indicate how frequently an ego reported communicating with an alter face-to-face, via telephone, or via text.

dplyr::glimpse(ngq_aa)
#> Rows: 123
#> Columns: 5
#> $ ego_id   <int> 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4…
#> $ alter1   <dbl> 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3…
#> $ alter2   <dbl> 2, 4, 3, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,…
#> $ type     <chr> "friends", "friends", "friends", "friends", "friends", "frien…
#> $ freqtalk <dbl> 1, 3, 4, 5, 3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 3, 1, 1, 1, 5…

The first column in the alter-alter edgelist is the ID number of the corresponding ego, with the following two columns indicating the two alters connected by an edge within the ego’s network. The edgelist also contains a type variable indicating the type of relationship that exists between each pair of alters ("friends", "related", "other_rel"), and an additional variable indicating how frequently alters talk to one another.

It is worth remembering, as stated earlier, that alter-alter edgelists should be formatted to have unique rows for each unique edge-type combination. Let’s take a look at how this appears in one of our ego networks:

ngq_aa %>%
  dplyr::filter(ego_id == 4)
ego_id alter1 alter2 type freqtalk
4 1 2 friends 5
4 1 3 friends 3
4 1 4 friends 3
4 1 5 friends 3
4 1 6 friends 4
4 1 7 friends 3

Here we see that ego indicated the first six pairs of nodes in this edgelist as being connected by friendships. This edgelist also includes pairs of nodes that are connected as relatives, though we don’t display them above. Within the edgelist, each dyad is given its own row, and the type of relationship for each dyad is clearly identified in the type column.

Using the ego_netwrite function, we will generate an extensive set of measures and summaries for each of the 20 networks in this dataset. ego_netwrite asks users to specify several arguments pertaining to our ego list, alter list, and alter-alter edgelist. In order to familiarize ourselves with this function, we list these arguments below, organized by category.

Ego List Arguments

Alter List Arguments

Alter-Alter Edgelist Arguments

Additional Arguments

Now let’s use ego_netwrite to process these ego networks:

ngq_nw <- ego_netwrite(egos = ngq_egos,
                       ego_id = ngq_egos$ego_id,

                       alters = ngq_alters,
                       alter_id = ngq_alters$alter_id,
                       alter_ego = ngq_alters$ego_id,

                       max_alters = 10,
                       alter_alter = ngq_aa,
                       aa_ego = ngq_aa$ego_id,
                       i_elements = ngq_aa$alter1,
                       j_elements = ngq_aa$alter2,
                       directed = FALSE)

Upon completion, ego_netwrite stores its outputs in a single list object. In the following section, we’ll examine each of the outputs within this list and what they contain.

Interpreting ego_netwrite Output

Ego List

Alongside other outputs, ego_netwrite produces cleaned and reformatted versions of each of the three data frames it takes as inputs. Our ego list, stored in the egos object, is more or less the same. However, ego_netwrite may rename our original column for unique ego IDs as original_ego_id and create a new ego_id column to ensure consistent processing. We see this is the case here in how the function has handled our NGQ data:

head(ngq_nw$egos)
ego_id original_ego_id age sex race black white other_race edu pol
1 1 41 2 White FALSE TRUE FALSE 5 3
2 2 14 1 Other FALSE FALSE TRUE 7 2
3 3 35 2 White FALSE TRUE FALSE 7 3
4 4 17 2 White FALSE TRUE FALSE 6 3
5 5 43 1 White FALSE TRUE FALSE 7 2
6 6 24 1 Other FALSE FALSE TRUE 6 3

Alter List

In contrast, ego_netwrite’s updated alter list is noticeably different from the alter list we started with. ego_netwrite calculates a set of frequently used node-level measures for each individual alter based on their position within their respective ego network. This set includes measure of node centrality and membership in isolated components, where applicable, and follows the original variables appearing in our alter list. Additionally, the first two columns of this data frame contain new unique ID numbers for alters and their corresponding egos to ensure the the alter list accurately links to our ego list and alter-alter edgelist. Note that alter IDs here are zero-indexed– this is done to maximize compatibility with the igraph package, which has been known to rely on zero-indexing.

head(ngq_nw$alters)
ego_id id alter_id original_ego_id original_alter_id sex race white black other_race pol family friend other_rel face phone text total_degree closeness betweenness_scores bonpow bonpow_negative burt_constraint burt_hierarchy effective_size reachability eigen_centrality
1 0 1 1 1 1 White TRUE FALSE FALSE 5 TRUE FALSE FALSE 5 5 5 0 NaN 0.00 NA NA 1.0 NA 0 0.00 NA
1 1 2 1 2 1 White TRUE FALSE FALSE 7 FALSE TRUE FALSE 2 2 4 0 NaN 0.00 NA NA 1.0 NA 0 0.00 NA
2 0 1 2 1 1 White TRUE FALSE FALSE 2 FALSE FALSE TRUE 4 4 4 0 NaN NaN NA NA 1.0 NA 0 NaN NA
3 0 1 3 1 1 Black FALSE TRUE FALSE 1 FALSE TRUE FALSE 3 1 1 2 0.75 0.05 1.2158433 1.3351669 0.5 0 2 0.75 0.4253254
3 1 2 3 2 1 White TRUE FALSE FALSE 3 FALSE TRUE FALSE 1 1 5 2 0.75 0.05 1.2158433 1.3351669 0.5 0 2 0.75 0.4253254
3 2 3 3 3 1 White TRUE FALSE FALSE 2 FALSE TRUE FALSE 1 1 5 1 0.50 0.00 0.7223054 0.4661861 1.0 1 1 0.75 0.2628656

Alter-Alter Edgelist

The alter-alter edgelist has been updated to to contain unique dyad-level ids, ego IDs, simplified ego and alter IDs (i_id and j_id, respectively), and the original id variables as they initially appeared in our input. As with alter ids in alters, i_id and j_id here are zero-indexed to maximize compatibility with the igraph.

head(ngq_nw$alter_edgelist)
Obs_ID ego_id i_elements i_id j_elements j_id alter1 alter2 type freqtalk
1 3 1 0 2 1 1 2 friends 1
2 3 1 0 4 3 1 4 friends 3
3 3 2 1 3 2 2 3 friends 4
4 4 1 0 2 1 1 2 friends 5
5 4 1 0 3 2 1 3 friends 3
6 4 1 0 4 3 1 4 friends 3

Network-Level Measures

Beyond our modified inputs, ego_netwrite’s output contains a dataset providing summaries of each ego network. These summaries include measures of network size, number of isolates, fragmentation, centralization, and the prevalence of certain kinds of dyads and triads in the network.

head(ngq_nw$summaries)
ego_id network_size mean_degree density num_isolates prop_isolates num_weakcomponent size_largest_weakcomponent prop_largest_weakcomponent num_strongcomponent size_largest_strongcomponent prop_largest_strongcomponent component_ratio pairwise_strong_un pairwise_weak_un fragmentation_index effective_size efficiency constraint betweenness norm_betweenness dyad_mut dyad_null triad_003 triad_102 triad_201 triad_300
1 2 0.0 0.0000000 2 1.0 2 1 0.5 2 1 0.5 1.00 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0000000 0.5000000 1.00 1.0000000 0 1 0 0 0 0
2 1 0.0 NaN 1 1.0 1 1 1.0 1 1 1.0 NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.0 1.0000000 1.0000000 0.00 NaN 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 5 1.2 0.3000000 1 0.2 2 4 0.8 2 4 0.8 0.25 0.6 0.6 0.4 3.8 0.7600000 0.4511111 6.00 0.6000000 3 7 3 5 2 0
4 10 8.6 0.9555556 0 0.0 1 10 1.0 1 10 1.0 0.00 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.4 0.1400000 0.3599197 0.25 0.0055556 43 2 0 1 14 105
5 3 2.0 1.0000000 0 0.0 1 3 1.0 1 3 1.0 0.00 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.3333333 0.9259259 0.00 0.0000000 3 0 0 0 0 1
6 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Users may find it convenient to combine summaries and egos into a single dataframe, as elements stored in each object may be used simultaneously in later statistical modeling. Combining the two objects is as simple as merging along the ego_id column:

egos2 <- ngq_nw$egos %>%
  dplyr::left_join(ngq_nw$summaries, by = "ego_id")

head(egos2)
ego_id original_ego_id age sex race black white other_race edu pol network_size mean_degree density num_isolates prop_isolates num_weakcomponent size_largest_weakcomponent prop_largest_weakcomponent num_strongcomponent size_largest_strongcomponent prop_largest_strongcomponent component_ratio pairwise_strong_un pairwise_weak_un fragmentation_index effective_size efficiency constraint betweenness norm_betweenness dyad_mut dyad_null triad_003 triad_102 triad_201 triad_300
1 1 41 2 White FALSE TRUE FALSE 5 3 2 0.0 0.0000000 2 1.0 2 1 0.5 2 1 0.5 1.00 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0000000 0.5000000 1.00 1.0000000 0 1 0 0 0 0
2 2 14 1 Other FALSE FALSE TRUE 7 2 1 0.0 NaN 1 1.0 1 1 1.0 1 1 1.0 NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.0 1.0000000 1.0000000 0.00 NaN 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 3 35 2 White FALSE TRUE FALSE 7 3 5 1.2 0.3000000 1 0.2 2 4 0.8 2 4 0.8 0.25 0.6 0.6 0.4 3.8 0.7600000 0.4511111 6.00 0.6000000 3 7 3 5 2 0
4 4 17 2 White FALSE TRUE FALSE 6 3 10 8.6 0.9555556 0 0.0 1 10 1.0 1 10 1.0 0.00 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.4 0.1400000 0.3599197 0.25 0.0055556 43 2 0 1 14 105
5 5 43 1 White FALSE TRUE FALSE 7 2 3 2.0 1.0000000 0 0.0 1 3 1.0 1 3 1.0 0.00 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.3333333 0.9259259 0.00 0.0000000 3 0 0 0 0 1
6 6 24 1 Other FALSE FALSE TRUE 6 3 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Summary of Overall Dataset

Additionally, ego_netwrite provides an overall_summary that allows users to get a sense of the properties of a typical ego network in their dataset. Because certain measures are impossible to calculate for ego networks consisting of 0-1 alters, certain measures in overall_summary are only calculated for networks containing 2+ alters. Measures calculated in this way are specified as such in the measure_descriptions column.

ngq_nw$overall_summary
measure_labels measure_descriptions measures
Number of egos/ego networks Total number of egos providing ego networks in dataset 20
Number of alters Total number of alters nominated by egos across entire dataset 67
Number of isolates Number of egos who did not report any alters in their personal network 2
Number of one-node networks Number of egos who reported only one alter in their personal network 3
Smallest non-isolate network size Smallest number of alters provided by a single ego 1
Largest network size Largest number of alters provided by a single ego 10
Average network size Average number of alters provided by a single ego 3.35
Average network density The average density of personal networks provided by egos (networks with 0-1 alters excluded from calculation) 0.786296296296296
Average fragmentation The mean fragmentation index score of personal networks provided by egos (networks with 0-1 alters excluded from calculation) 0.215555555555556

igraph Objects

Finally, ego_netwrite constructs igraph objects for each individual ego network and stores them in the igraph_objects list. Each element in this list is a sub-list corresponding to an individual ego. Let’s take a look at the elements of each sub-list:

names(ngq_nw$igraph_objects[[1]])
#> [1] "ego"        "ego_info"   "igraph"     "igraph_ego"

The ego item is simply the unique ID number for the ego corresponding to a given sub-list, and is mainly included to allow users to search for a specific ego within igraph_objects. Here we confirm that the sixth element in igraph_objects contains items corresponding to ego 4 in summaries:

which(lapply(ngq_nw$igraph_objects, function(x){x$ego} == 4) == TRUE)
#> [1] 4

ego_info contains additional information about the specific ego, stored as a single-row data frame. The information contained in ego_info is identical to that provided for the specific node in the ego list used as an input for ego_netwrite:

ngq_nw$igraph_objects[[4]]$ego_info
ego_id original_ego_id age sex race black white other_race edu pol
4 4 4 17 2 White FALSE TRUE FALSE 6 3

By default, ego_netwrite produces two igraph objects for each ego, which may be used for visualizations or for additional analyses. Depending on their needs, users may require a representation of an ego network in which the ego itself is either included or excluded from the network. The object entitled igraph contains the entire network with ego excluded, while the one entitled igraph_ego contains the network with ego included. Let’s take a look at the igraph object for ego 4:

ngq_nw$igraph_objects[[4]]$igraph
#> IGRAPH 493b854 UN-- 10 43 -- 
#> + attr: name (v/c), alter_id (v/n), ego_id (v/n), original_ego_id
#> | (v/n), original_alter_id (v/n), sex (v/n), race (v/c), white (v/l),
#> | black (v/l), other_race (v/l), pol (v/n), family (v/l), friend (v/l),
#> | other_rel (v/l), face (v/n), phone (v/n), text (v/n), i_elements
#> | (e/n), j_elements (e/n), ego_id (e/n), alter1 (e/n), alter2 (e/n),
#> | type (e/c), freqtalk (e/n)
#> + edges from 493b854 (vertex names):
#>  [1] 0--1 0--2 0--3 0--4 0--5 0--6 0--7 0--8 0--9 1--2 1--3 1--4 1--5 1--6 1--7
#> [16] 1--8 1--9 2--3 2--4 2--5 2--6 2--7 2--8 2--9 3--4 3--5 3--6 3--7 4--5 4--6
#> [31] 4--7 4--8 4--9 5--6 5--7 5--8 5--9 6--7 6--8 6--9 7--8 7--9 8--9

We see here that this network contains 10 nodes and 43 edges. These values reflect the 10 alters nominated by ego and the 43 edges ego reported existing between them. Also note that the alter- and edge-level attributes found in our original alter list and alter-alter edgelist are already embedded in this igraph object. The inclusion of these attributes may help users customize visualizations more easily. To show this in practice, let’s visualize ego 4’s igraph ego object which each alter’s respective node colored by their sex:

ego4 <- ngq_nw$igraph_objects[[4]]$igraph_ego

plot(ego4,
     vertex.color = igraph::V(ego4)$sex,
     layout = igraph::layout.fruchterman.reingold(ego4))

By default, nodes in the plotted igraph object will be displayed with their zero-indexed unique ID numbers as labels, while the node representing ego will be labeled “ego.”

Processing Multiple Relationship Types

It is common for egocentric datasets to record several different types of relationships between individuals in the same ego network. Researchers may capture different types of relationships by using unique name generator questions for each relationship type, or by asking participants to describe the nature a relationship once it has been recorded. The NGQ dataset used here is an example of egocentric data with multiple relationship types: ties between ego and alter, as well as ties between alters, are specified as some combination of friendship, familial, and/or miscellaneous relations. Users may want to measure various aspects of ego networks with only a specific type of relationship in mind. Fortunately, ego_netwrite supports the processing of ego networks with different relationship types with minimal changes to how the function is used. However, ego_netwrite’s output changes somewhat when relationship types are taken into account. What follows is an overview of these changes.

Different Types of Ego-Alter Relationships

When working with different types of relationships between egos and alters, relationship types should be stored as a series of logical or dummy variables in the dummy list. This is already the case in ngq_alters: we see that relationship types are coded in the columns family, friend, and other_rel:

To handle these codings in ego_netwrite, we need only add the alter_types argument. As described earlier in this vignette, alter_types takes a character vector containing the names of columns in the alter list storing type codings, which ego_netwrite uses to identify these columns when processing.

alter_types_nw <- ego_netwrite(egos = ngq_egos,
                       ego_id = ngq_egos$ego_id,

                       alters = ngq_alters,
                       alter_id = ngq_alters$alter_id,
                       alter_ego = ngq_alters$ego_id,
                       # Note the inclusion of `alter_types` here
                       alter_types = c("family", "friend", "other_rel"),

                       max_alters = 10,
                       alter_alter = ngq_aa,
                       aa_ego = ngq_aa$ego_id,
                       i_elements = ngq_aa$alter1,
                       j_elements = ngq_aa$alter2,
                       directed = FALSE)

When ego-alter relationship types are accounted for, the ego-level summaries dataframe contains additional columns indicating the extent to which different types of ego-alter relationships are correlated with one another. The number of columns added reflects the number of unique pairs of relationship types for which correlations are calculated. Values within these columns are coded NA if all ego-alter relationships in a given network are of a single type; otherwise values should be interpreted as one normally would with correlations. We see here that egos 2-6 only reported having one type of relationship across all their nominated alters. By contrast, ego 1 included both friends and family members in their network, but these categories were mutually exclusive.

ego_id alter_cor_family_friend alter_cor_family_other_rel alter_cor_friend_other_rel
1 -1 NA NA
2 NA NA NA
3 NA NA NA
4 NA NA NA
5 NA NA NA
6 NA NA NA

With multiple relationship types in hand, the overall_summary data frame is now considerably longer. Dataset-wide summaries are now given for specific types of relationships in isolation, as well as for all relationship types combined. Parenthetical phrases in the measure_labels column beginning with “Ego-Alter” indicate the specific relationship type described for a given measure:

measure_labels measure_descriptions measures
Number of egos/ego networks Total number of egos providing ego networks in dataset 20
Number of alters Total number of alters nominated by egos across entire dataset 67
Number of isolates Number of egos who did not report any alters in their personal network 2
Number of one-node networks Number of egos who reported only one alter in their personal network 3
Smallest non-isolate network size Smallest number of alters provided by a single ego 1
Largest network size Largest number of alters provided by a single ego 10
Average network size Average number of alters provided by a single ego 3.35
Average network density The average density of personal networks provided by egos (networks with 0-1 alters excluded from calculation) 0.786296296296296
Average fragmentation The mean fragmentation index score of personal networks provided by egos (networks with 0-1 alters excluded from calculation) 0.215555555555556
(Ego-Alter family) Number of alters Total number of alters nominated by egos across entire dataset 25
(Ego-Alter family) Number of isolates Number of egos who did not report any alters in their personal network 10
(Ego-Alter family) Number of one-node networks Number of egos who reported only one alter in their personal network 5
(Ego-Alter family) Smallest non-isolate network size Smallest number of alters provided by a single ego 1
(Ego-Alter family) Largest network size Largest number of alters provided by a single ego 9
(Ego-Alter family) Average network size Average number of alters provided by a single ego 2.5
(Ego-Alter friend) Number of alters Total number of alters nominated by egos across entire dataset 32
(Ego-Alter friend) Number of isolates Number of egos who did not report any alters in their personal network 7
(Ego-Alter friend) Number of one-node networks Number of egos who reported only one alter in their personal network 4
(Ego-Alter friend) Smallest non-isolate network size Smallest number of alters provided by a single ego 1
(Ego-Alter friend) Largest network size Largest number of alters provided by a single ego 5
(Ego-Alter friend) Average network size Average number of alters provided by a single ego 2.46153846153846
(Ego-Alter other_rel) Number of alters Total number of alters nominated by egos across entire dataset 9
(Ego-Alter other_rel) Number of isolates Number of egos who did not report any alters in their personal network 15
(Ego-Alter other_rel) Number of one-node networks Number of egos who reported only one alter in their personal network 4
(Ego-Alter other_rel) Smallest non-isolate network size Smallest number of alters provided by a single ego 1
(Ego-Alter other_rel) Largest network size Largest number of alters provided by a single ego 5
(Ego-Alter other_rel) Average network size Average number of alters provided by a single ego 1.8

Different Types of Alter-Alter Relationships

Overall, incorporating different relationship types between egos and their alters produces minimal changes to ego_netwrite’s outputs. The incorporation of different relationship types between alters, however, results in more extensive changes. To familiarize ourselves with these changes, we will ignore different types of ego-alter ties in our next example.

While relationship types between ego and alters are coded as a series of logical or dummy variables in the alter list, types of relationships between alters are stored as a single character column in the alter-alter edgelist. Each row in the alter-alter edgelist represents a unique dyad-type combination, which we illustrated earlier:

ego_id alter1 alter2 type freqtalk
4 1 2 friends 5
4 1 3 friends 3
4 1 4 friends 3
4 1 5 friends 3
4 1 6 friends 4
4 1 7 friends 3

The type column in our alter-alter edgelist (ngq_aa) specifies whether a given alter-alter dyad entails a friendship, familial relationship, or miscellaneous relationship. To have ego_netwrite process these data according to relationship type, we pass this column as a vector into the function’s aa_type argument:

aa_types_nw <- ego_netwrite(egos = ngq_egos,
                            ego_id = ngq_egos$ego_id,
    
                            alters = ngq_alters,
                            alter_id = ngq_alters$alter_id,
                            alter_ego = ngq_alters$ego_id,
    
                            max_alters = 10,
                            alter_alter = ngq_aa,
                            aa_ego = ngq_aa$ego_id,
                            i_elements = ngq_aa$alter1,
                            j_elements = ngq_aa$alter2,
                            # Note the inclusion of `aa_type` here
                            aa_type = ngq_aa$type,
                            directed = FALSE)

Incorporating alter-alter relationship types creates several new columns in our alters dataframe. In addition to the set of node-level measures ego_netwrite always generates, the function produces the same set of measures for each unique relationship type. This allows us to see each node’s centrality, for example, in its respective network of friendship and familial, and miscellaneous ties. These measures are given the same names as their counterparts for the overall ego network but have the name of their corresponding type appended to the end (e.g. total_degree_friends).

ego_id id alter_id original_ego_id original_alter_id sex race white black other_race pol family friend other_rel face phone text total_degree closeness betweenness_scores bonpow bonpow_negative burt_constraint burt_hierarchy effective_size reachability eigen_centrality total_degree_friends total_degree_related total_degree_other_rel closeness_friends closeness_related closeness_other_rel betweenness_scores_friends betweenness_scores_related betweenness_scores_other_rel bonpow_friends bonpow_related bonpow_other_rel bonpow_negative_friends bonpow_negative_related bonpow_negative_other_rel burt_constraint_friends burt_constraint_related burt_constraint_other_rel burt_hierarchy_friends burt_hierarchy_related burt_hierarchy_other_rel effective_size_friends effective_size_related effective_size_other_rel reachability_friends reachability_related reachability_other_rel
1 0 1 1 1 1 White TRUE FALSE FALSE 5 TRUE FALSE FALSE 5 5 5 0 NaN 0.00 NA NA 1.0 NA 0 0.00 NA 0 0 0 NaN NaN NaN 0.00 0 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.0 1 1 NA NA NA 0 0 0 0.00 0 0
1 1 2 1 2 1 White TRUE FALSE FALSE 7 FALSE TRUE FALSE 2 2 4 0 NaN 0.00 NA NA 1.0 NA 0 0.00 NA 0 0 0 NaN NaN NaN 0.00 0 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.0 1 1 NA NA NA 0 0 0 0.00 0 0
2 0 1 2 1 1 White TRUE FALSE FALSE 2 FALSE FALSE TRUE 4 4 4 0 NaN NaN NA NA 1.0 NA 0 NaN NA 0 0 0 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.0 1 1 NA NA NA 0 0 0 NaN NaN NaN
3 0 1 3 1 1 Black FALSE TRUE FALSE 1 FALSE TRUE FALSE 3 1 1 2 0.75 0.05 1.2158433 1.3351669 0.5 0 2 0.75 0.4253254 2 0 0 0.75 NaN NaN 0.05 0 0 1.2158433 NA NA 1.3351669 NA NA 0.5 1 1 0 NA NA 2 0 0 0.75 0 0
3 1 2 3 2 1 White TRUE FALSE FALSE 3 FALSE TRUE FALSE 1 1 5 2 0.75 0.05 1.2158433 1.3351669 0.5 0 2 0.75 0.4253254 2 0 0 0.75 NaN NaN 0.05 0 0 1.2158433 NA NA 1.3351669 NA NA 0.5 1 1 0 NA NA 2 0 0 0.75 0 0
3 2 3 3 3 1 White TRUE FALSE FALSE 2 FALSE TRUE FALSE 1 1 5 1 0.50 0.00 0.7223054 0.4661861 1.0 1 1 0.75 0.2628656 1 0 0 0.50 NaN NaN 0.00 0 0 0.7223054 NA NA 0.4661861 NA NA 1.0 1 1 1 NA NA 1 0 0 0.75 0 0

Similarly, the ego-level summaries dataframe contains new measures of network size, isolate counts, fragmentation, centralization, and dyad/triad prevalence for each unique relationship type. It also calculates correlations for each pair of relationship types between alters in a fashion similar to what we saw for ego-alter ties before.

ego_id network_size mean_degree density num_isolates prop_isolates num_weakcomponent size_largest_weakcomponent prop_largest_weakcomponent num_strongcomponent size_largest_strongcomponent prop_largest_strongcomponent component_ratio pairwise_strong_un pairwise_weak_un fragmentation_index effective_size efficiency constraint betweenness norm_betweenness dyad_mut dyad_null triad_003 triad_102 triad_201 triad_300 network_size_friends network_size_related network_size_other_rel mean_degree_friends mean_degree_related mean_degree_other_rel density_friends density_related density_other_rel num_isolates_friends num_isolates_related num_isolates_other_rel prop_isolates_friends prop_isolates_related prop_isolates_other_rel num_weakcomponent_friends num_weakcomponent_related num_weakcomponent_other_rel size_largest_weakcomponent_friends size_largest_weakcomponent_related size_largest_weakcomponent_other_rel prop_largest_weakcomponent_friends prop_largest_weakcomponent_related prop_largest_weakcomponent_other_rel num_strongcomponent_friends num_strongcomponent_related num_strongcomponent_other_rel size_largest_strongcomponent_friends size_largest_strongcomponent_related size_largest_strongcomponent_other_rel prop_largest_strongcomponent_friends prop_largest_strongcomponent_related prop_largest_strongcomponent_other_rel component_ratio_friends component_ratio_related component_ratio_other_rel pairwise_strong_un_friends pairwise_strong_un_related pairwise_strong_un_other_rel pairwise_weak_un_friends pairwise_weak_un_related pairwise_weak_un_other_rel fragmentation_index_friends fragmentation_index_related fragmentation_index_other_rel effective_size_friends effective_size_related effective_size_other_rel efficiency_friends efficiency_related efficiency_other_rel constraint_friends constraint_related constraint_other_rel betweenness_friends betweenness_related betweenness_other_rel norm_betweenness_friends norm_betweenness_related norm_betweenness_other_rel dyad_mut_friends dyad_mut_related dyad_mut_other_rel dyad_null_friends dyad_null_related dyad_null_other_rel triad_003_friends triad_003_related triad_003_other_rel triad_102_friends triad_102_related triad_102_other_rel triad_201_friends triad_201_related triad_201_other_rel triad_300_friends triad_300_related triad_300_other_rel aa_cor_friends_other_rel aa_cor_friends_related aa_cor_other_rel_related
1 2 0.0 0.0000000 2 1.0 2 1 0.5 2 1 0.5 1.00 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0000000 0.5000000 1.00 1.0000000 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0.0 0.0 0 0.0000000 0.0000000 0 2 2 2 1.0 1.0 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 0.5000000 0.5 0.5000000 2 2 2 1 1 1 0.5000000 0.5 0.5000000 1.00 1.0000000 1 0.0 0.0000000 0 0.0 0.0000000 0 1.0 1.0000000 1 2.0 2.0 2 1.00 1.0000000 1 0.5000000 0.5000000 0.5000000 1.000000 1.00000 1 1.0000000 1.0000000 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA
2 1 0.0 NaN 1 1.0 1 1 1.0 1 1 1.0 NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.0 1.0000000 1.0000000 0.00 NaN 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0.0 0.0 0 NaN NaN NaN 1 1 1 1.0 1.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.0000000 1.0 1.0000000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.0000000 1.0 1.0000000 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 1.0 1.0 1 1.00 1.0000000 1 1.0000000 1.0000000 1.0000000 0.000000 0.00000 0 NaN NaN NaN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA
3 5 1.2 0.3000000 1 0.2 2 4 0.8 2 4 0.8 0.25 0.6 0.6 0.4 3.8 0.7600000 0.4511111 6.00 0.6000000 3 7 3 5 2 0 5 5 5 1.2 0.0 0 0.3000000 0.0000000 0 1 5 5 0.2 1.0 1 2 5 5 4 1 1 0.8000000 0.2 0.2000000 2 5 5 4 1 1 0.8000000 0.2 0.2000000 0.25 1.0000000 1 0.6 0.0000000 0 0.6 0.0000000 0 0.4 1.0000000 1 3.8 5.0 5 0.76 1.0000000 1 0.4511111 0.2000000 0.2000000 6.000000 10.00000 10 0.6000000 1.0000000 1 3 0 0 7 10 10 3 10 10 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 NA NA NA
4 10 8.6 0.9555556 0 0.0 1 10 1.0 1 10 1.0 0.00 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.4 0.1400000 0.3599197 0.25 0.0055556 43 2 0 1 14 105 10 10 10 5.8 2.8 0 0.6444444 0.3111111 0 0 1 10 0.0 0.1 1 1 3 10 10 5 1 1.0000000 0.5 0.1000000 1 3 10 10 5 1 1.0000000 0.5 0.1000000 0.00 0.2222222 1 1.0 0.3555556 0 1.0 0.3555556 0 0.0 0.6444444 1 4.2 7.2 10 0.42 0.7200000 1 0.3438003 0.2892389 0.1000000 2.619048 29.66667 45 0.0582011 0.6592593 1 29 14 0 16 31 45 10 30 120 8 77 0 82 4 0 20 9 0 NA -1 NA
5 3 2.0 1.0000000 0 0.0 1 3 1.0 1 3 1.0 0.00 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.3333333 0.9259259 0.00 0.0000000 3 0 0 0 0 1 3 3 3 0.0 2.0 0 0.0000000 1.0000000 0 3 0 3 1.0 0.0 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 0.3333333 1.0 0.3333333 3 1 3 1 3 1 0.3333333 1.0 0.3333333 1.00 0.0000000 1 0.0 1.0000000 0 0.0 1.0000000 0 1.0 0.0000000 1 3.0 1.0 3 1.00 0.3333333 1 0.3333333 0.9259259 0.3333333 3.000000 0.00000 3 1.0000000 0.0000000 1 0 3 0 3 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 NA NA NA
6 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0 0 0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Our overall_summary has also been expanded to show dataset-level summaries of each alter-alter relationship type. Parenthetical phrases in the measure_labels column beginning with “Alter-Alter” indicate the specific relationship type described for a given measure. Note here that measures relating to network size, number of isolates, and one-node networks remain the same across relation types, as ego-alter relationship types are not taken into account when calculating these measures. By contrast, measures of network density and fragmentation vary given the presence or absence of alter-alter ties.

measure_labels measure_descriptions measures
Number of egos/ego networks Total number of egos providing ego networks in dataset 20
Number of alters Total number of alters nominated by egos across entire dataset 67
Number of isolates Number of egos who did not report any alters in their personal network 2
Number of one-node networks Number of egos who reported only one alter in their personal network 3
Smallest non-isolate network size Smallest number of alters provided by a single ego 1
Largest network size Largest number of alters provided by a single ego 10
Average network size Average number of alters provided by a single ego 3.35
Average network density The average density of personal networks provided by egos (networks with 0-1 alters excluded from calculation) 0.786296296296296
Average fragmentation The mean fragmentation index score of personal networks provided by egos (networks with 0-1 alters excluded from calculation) 0.215555555555556
(Alter-Alter friends) Number of alters Total number of alters nominated by egos across entire dataset 67
(Alter-Alter friends) Number of isolates Number of egos who did not report any alters in their personal network 2
(Alter-Alter friends) Number of one-node networks Number of egos who reported only one alter in their personal network 3
(Alter-Alter friends) Smallest non-isolate network size Smallest number of alters provided by a single ego 1
(Alter-Alter friends) Largest network size Largest number of alters provided by a single ego 10
(Alter-Alter friends) Average network size Average number of alters provided by a single ego 3.35
(Alter-Alter friends) Average network density The average density of personal networks provided by egos (networks with 0-1 alters excluded from calculation) 0.534444444444444
(Alter-Alter friends) Average fragmentation The mean fragmentation index score of personal networks provided by egos (networks with 0-1 alters excluded from calculation) 0.315555555555556
(Alter-Alter related) Number of alters Total number of alters nominated by egos across entire dataset 67
(Alter-Alter related) Number of isolates Number of egos who did not report any alters in their personal network 2
(Alter-Alter related) Number of one-node networks Number of egos who reported only one alter in their personal network 3
(Alter-Alter related) Smallest non-isolate network size Smallest number of alters provided by a single ego 1
(Alter-Alter related) Largest network size Largest number of alters provided by a single ego 10
(Alter-Alter related) Average network size Average number of alters provided by a single ego 3.35
(Alter-Alter related) Average network density The average density of personal networks provided by egos (networks with 0-1 alters excluded from calculation) 0.185185185185185
(Alter-Alter related) Average fragmentation The mean fragmentation index score of personal networks provided by egos (networks with 0-1 alters excluded from calculation) 0.811851851851852
(Alter-Alter other_rel) Number of alters Total number of alters nominated by egos across entire dataset 67
(Alter-Alter other_rel) Number of isolates Number of egos who did not report any alters in their personal network 2
(Alter-Alter other_rel) Number of one-node networks Number of egos who reported only one alter in their personal network 3
(Alter-Alter other_rel) Smallest non-isolate network size Smallest number of alters provided by a single ego 1
(Alter-Alter other_rel) Largest network size Largest number of alters provided by a single ego 10
(Alter-Alter other_rel) Average network size Average number of alters provided by a single ego 3.35
(Alter-Alter other_rel) Average network density The average density of personal networks provided by egos (networks with 0-1 alters excluded from calculation) 0.0666666666666667
(Alter-Alter other_rel) Average fragmentation The mean fragmentation index score of personal networks provided by egos (networks with 0-1 alters excluded from calculation) 0.933333333333333

Finally, each element in the igraph_objects list now contains an “igraph” and “igraph_ego” object for each alter-alter type, allowing users to look at specific kinds of relationships without having to subset the network themselves.

names(aa_types_nw$igraph_objects[[1]])
#>  [1] "ego"                  "ego_info"             "igraph"              
#>  [4] "igraph_ego"           "igraph_friends"       "igraph_ego_friends"  
#>  [7] "igraph_related"       "igraph_ego_related"   "igraph_other_rel"    
#> [10] "igraph_ego_other_rel"

The availability of these new objects may be convenient for users who wish to visualize differences in the prevalence of certain types of alter-alter ties in a single ego network, as shown in the example below:

ego7 <- aa_types_nw$igraph_objects[[7]]$igraph_ego
ego7_friends <- aa_types_nw$igraph_objects[[7]]$igraph_ego_friends
ego7_family <- aa_types_nw$igraph_objects[[7]]$igraph_ego_related
ego7_other <- aa_types_nw$igraph_objects[[7]]$igraph_ego_other_rel

ego7_layout <- igraph::layout.fruchterman.reingold(ego7)

plot(ego7,
     vertex.color = igraph::V(ego7)$sex,
     layout = ego7_layout,
     main = "Overall Network")

plot(ego7_friends,
     vertex.color = igraph::V(ego7_friends)$sex,
     layout = ego7_layout,
     main = "Friends")

plot(ego7_family,
     vertex.color = igraph::V(ego7_family)$sex,
     layout = ego7_layout,
     main = "Family")

plot(ego7_other,
     vertex.color = igraph::V(ego7_other)$sex,
     layout = ego7_layout,
     main = "Other Relationships")

You might notice that the number of columns and other elements of output grows substantially when ego_netwrite takes alter-alter relationship types into account, particularly if the number of unique types is quite large. Moreover, the summaries and overall_summary objects may grow even larger when ego_netwrite is asked to process both ego-alter and alter-alter types. While ego_netwrite provides all of this output in the interest of being exhaustive, some users may find its volume somewhat unwieldy. If this is the case, users may want to condense relationship types into a simpler set of categories to reduce the number of additional measures generated.

Measuring Homophily, Heterophily, and Diversity

Network scholars are often interested in questions pertaining to homophily (in which nodes with similar properties form ties with one another), heterophily (in which nodes with different properties form ties), and diversity. While generating measures of these phenomena are not fundamentally difficult, they often entail implicit decisions made by users that automated workflows like ego_netwrite cannot easily anticipate. Consequently, ideanet offers a set of functions for popular measures of homophily, heterophily, and diversity in ego networks that users can apply at their own discretion once they have finished running ego_netwrite.

To see how we use these functions we’ll start with measures of diversity for categorical variables. Users should note that each of these functions takes columns from the alters dataframe as its inputs. Although we will not go into specific detail about each measure generated here, we encourage readers to consult ideanet’s documentation for a bit of added context.

alters <- aa_types_nw$alters

# H-Index
race_h_index <- h_index(ego_id = alters$ego_id,
                        measure = alters$race,
                        prefix = "race")
# Index of Qualitative Variation (Normalized H-Index)
race_iqv <- iqv(ego_id = alters$ego_id,
                measure = alters$race,
                prefix = "race")

While the above measures of attribute diversity apply to networks belonging to egos, you might notice that they do not take ego’s own attribute values into account. Measures of homophily, by contrast, compare alter attributes to ego’s in order to gauge how likely ego is to form ties with similar others. Accordingly, measures of homophily in ego networks require additional arguments whose values can be extracted from the egos dataframe:

egos <- aa_types_nw$egos

# Ego Homophily (Count)
race_homophily_c <- ego_homophily(ego_id = egos$ego_id,
                                  ego_measure = egos$race,
                                  alter_ego = alters$ego_id,
                                  alter_measure = alters$race,
                                  prefix = "race",
                                  prop = FALSE)
# Ego Homophily (Proportion)
race_homophily_p <- ego_homophily(ego_id = egos$ego_id,
                                  ego_measure = egos$race,
                                  alter_ego = alters$ego_id,
                                  alter_measure = alters$race,
                                  prefix = "race",
                                  prop = TRUE)
# E-I Index
race_ei <- ei_index(ego_id = egos$ego_id,
                       ego_measure = egos$race,
                       alter_ego = alters$ego_id,
                       alter_measure = alters$race,
                       prefix = "race")
# Pearson's Phi
race_pphi <- pearson_phi(ego_id = egos$ego_id,
                            ego_measure = egos$race,
                            alter_ego = alters$ego_id,
                            alter_measure = alters$race,
                            prefix = "race")

For measures of homophily on continuous measures, we offer a function for calculating Euclidean distance:

# Euclidean Distance
pol_euc <- euclidean_distance(ego_id = egos$ego_id,
                              ego_measure = egos$pol,
                              alter_ego = alters$ego_id,
                              alter_measure = alters$pol,
                              prefix = "pol")

Each of these functions produces a dataframe with two columns: an ego_id column for compatibility with other outputs and a second column containing the measure produced by the function for each ego network. These dataframes can be quickly merged into egos or summaries in order to extend analysis at the level of individual egos and/or their networks.

egos <- egos %>%
  dplyr::left_join(race_h_index, by = "ego_id") %>%
  dplyr::left_join(race_homophily_p, by = "ego_id") %>%
  dplyr::left_join(pol_euc, by = "ego_id")
ego_id original_ego_id age sex race black white other_race edu pol race_h_index race_prop_same pol_euclidean_distance
1 1 41 2 White FALSE TRUE FALSE 5 3 0.00 1.0 2.2360680
2 2 14 1 Other FALSE FALSE TRUE 7 2 0.00 0.0 0.0000000
3 3 35 2 White FALSE TRUE FALSE 7 3 0.32 0.8 0.5291503
4 4 17 2 White FALSE TRUE FALSE 6 3 0.00 1.0 0.5477226
5 5 43 1 White FALSE TRUE FALSE 7 2 0.00 1.0 1.0540926
6 6 24 1 Other FALSE FALSE TRUE 6 3 NA NA NA

Exporting to egor

Some users may want convert their egocentric data into an egor object. egor objects are especially convenient for fitting exponential random graph models (ERGMs) using egocentric data, which allow researchers to simulate and estimate global network structures for settings where sociocentric data capture is not possible. ego_netwrite supports the option to create egor objects alongside other function outputs. However, because it is not a core dependency of ideanet, users must ensure that they have already installed the egor package before using this feature:

install.packages("egor")

Once installed, users can specify egor = TRUE in ego_netwrite to create an egor object based on the ego list, alter list and alter-alter edgelist fed into the function. This object is given the simple name egor:

egor

Network Canvas Compatibility (nc_read)

ideanet includes a function specifically designed to read and process data generated by Network Canvas, an increasingly popular tool for egocentric data capture. This function, named nc_read, reads in a directory of CSV files exported from Network Canvas and returns a list of dataframes optimized for use with ego_netwrite.

Although ideanet does not contain examples of data generated by Network Canvas, we provide a detailed overview of how to work with nc_read in the Reading Network Canvas Data vignette, which you can access by running the following line of code:

vignette("nc_read", package = "ideanet")

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.