The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
Forth-like languages are nice because they don’t require a lot of variables. However, sometimes there’s a problem that requires saving a particular value for later usage that can’t be on the stack. This is where variables, constants, and arrays come in.
Let’s say we want to store a value somewhere outside of the stack. We
can initialize a variable using the VARIABLE
word.
fr> VARIABLE testvar
ok.
Nothing happened! That’s because this word only allocates space for a
variable without doing any other actions. We can now call the name of
the variable at any time to push its address onto the stack. In Forth,
this would be an actual memory address. froth
, however,
uses an abstracted memory map.
fr> test .s
[[1]]
[1] "addr <test, cell 0>"
[[2]]
NULL
ok.
We can see the address of the variable at the top of the stack. We’ll
come back to the cell 0
bit later.
To store a value in a variable, we use !
. We can copy
the value in an address to the stick using @
.
fr> variable newvar
ok.
fr> 20 newvar !
ok.
fr> newvar @ .
20 ok.
Notice that for !
we push the value first, then the
address. It’s also important to note that the variable retains its value
even after calling @
.
fr> variable newvar
ok.
fr> 20 newvar !
ok.
fr> newvar dup @ . dup @ . @ .
20 20 20 ok.
@ .
is a pretty common call to inspect the value of a
variable. In fact, it’s so common that there’s a shortcut word to
perform both, ?
.
fr> variable newvar 20 newvar !
ok.
fr> newvar ?
20 ok.
Variables are often useful as counters, using the +!
command. +!
is similar to !
, except that it
adds to the variable rather than replacing it.
fr> variable newvar
ok.
fr> 0 newvar !
ok.
fr> 5 0 do 1 newvar +! loop newvar ?
5 ok.
Sometimes we just need a name for a value. Variables that will never
change values are called constants, and can be fittingly be defined with
the CONSTANT
word.
fr> 100 CONSTANT hundred
ok.
fr> hundred .
100 ok.
Constants avoid the hassle of dealing with addresses, and can be accessed slightly faster than variables. Calling the name of the variable copies its value directly onto the stack.
Remember when I said we’d come back to that whole
“cell 0
” thing? By default, initializing a variable creates
space for one “thing” at an address. Unlike Forth, froth
creates this space at an abstracted memory location, and that space is
big enough for any arbitrary R object. However, sometimes it’s nice to
have a variable that can store more than one value, like in the case of
vectors or lists in R.
Let’s start by initializing an array. The definition proceeds like in normal variables, we just have to further specify that we want the variable to be larger than a single value:
fr> VARIABLE myarray 5 CELLS ALLOT
ok.
This initializes a variable with 5 slots for things. Internally, this
is the same as a length 5 list. The word ALLOT
allots
memory for the preceding variable, and we’ll come back to
CELLS
in a moment.
Previously, we saw this behavior:
fr> myarray .s
[[1]]
[1] "addr <myarray, cell 0>"
[[2]]
NULL
ok.
cell 0
means that this address is pointing to the first
value of the array myarray
. Cells are 0-indexed in
froth
, so this is the first entry in the array. Now as
before, we can store a value at the first cell. I’m assuming the address
is still on the stack, so remember we need to call swap
to
ensure the top value is the address.
fr> 1 swap !
ok.
fr> myarray ?
1 ok.
Ok, now we can look at the word CELLS
. Let’s start by
inspecting what we get by pushing CELLS
to the stack:
fr> 4 CELLS .s clear
[[1]]
[1] "addr <, cell 4>"
[[2]]
NULL
ok.
It’s the fourth cell of…nothing? CELLS
creates a unique
kind of address–it stores cell number, but it doesn’t point to any
variable. Words like ALLOT
expect one of these objects to
tell it how much space to allocate. While CELLS
calls don’t
point to anything, we can add them to variable addresses to get to other
values in the array.
fr> myarray
ok.
fr> 4 CELLS + .s
[[1]]
[1] "addr <myarray, cell 4>"
[[2]]
NULL
ok.
Notice how we’ve now gotten an address to myarray
that’s
offset by 4 cells. Since the size of myarray
is 5, this is
the final entry in the array (indexing starts at 0, so the 5 entries are
0-4). This address works like the examples in the Variables section, so
we can use !
, @
, +!
, and
?
on it:
fr> VARIABLE myarray 5 CELLS ALLOT
ok.
fr> 0 BEGIN dup 5 < WHILE dup dup myarray swap CELLS + ! 1 + REPEAT drop
ok.
Here we’re putting it all together. See if you can guess what the
contents of myarray
now look like before reading the next
section.
We start by initializing an array myarray
of size 5.
Then, we put 0
on the stack and begin
a loop.
At each iteration of the loop we:
myarray
, swap it with the top
duplicatemyarray
So what happens? When the stack is 0, we store 0 at the 0th position
of myarray
, then 1 at the 1st position, 2 at the second,
etc. Let’s print out the entire array:
fr> 5 0 do myarray i cells + ? loop
0 1 2 3 4 ok.
It’s also possible to initialize an array to a specific value using
the CREATE
and ,
words. Pay very close
attention to this syntax!
fr> CREATE myarray 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ,
ok.
fr> 5 0 do myarray i cells + ? loop
0 1 2 3 4 ok.
Did you notice how we used ,
? Unlike English,
,
is a froth
word, meaning that it needs to be
space separated and it acts upon the stack. This means that we
must include a comma after the last element to ensure
it’s added to the array.
It’s often useful to be able to quickly change the values or the size of allocated arrays.
To change the values in an array, we can use the FILL
word. FILL
expects three items on the stack: a variable
address, a CELLS
offset n
, and a value
x
. It then fills the first n
cells with
x
.
fr> variable filltest 3 cells allot
ok.
fr> 3 0 do i filltest i cells + ! loop
ok.
fr> 3 0 do filltest i cells + ? loop
0 1 2 ok.
fr> filltest 3 cells 10 fill
ok.
fr> 3 0 do filltest i cells + ? loop
10 10 10 ok.
There’s also the shortcut word ERASE
, which is
equivalent to 0 FILL
.
fr> filltest 3 cells erase
ok.
fr> 3 0 do filltest i cells + ? loop
0 0 0 ok.
That changes values, but what if we end up with the wrong size array
altogether? For that, we have two options: EXTEND
and
REALLOT
. Both of these words have the same form; they
expect the stack to be comprised of a variable address v
and a value n
. EXTEND
will make the array at
v
larger by n
cells, and REALLOT
will change v
to have exactly n
cells (copying
the contents of the first n
cells, if any).
fr> variable myarray 3 cells allot
ok.
fr> myarray 5 cells + ?
Error: array accessed out of bounds!
fr> myarray 2 cells extend
ok.
fr> myarray 5 cells + ?
0 ok.
fr> 10 myarray 1 cells + !
ok.
fr> myarray 3 cells reallot
ok.
fr> myarray 5 cells + ?
Error: array accessed out of bounds!
fr> myarray 1 cells + ?
10 ok.
If you’re ever unsure about how large your array is, use the
LENGTH
word to copy the length of an address to the stack,
and LENGTH?
to print it out.
fr> variable myarray 10 cells allot
ok.
fr> myarray LENGTH .
10 ok.
fr> myarray 20 cells reallot
ok.
fr> myarray LENGTH?
20 ok.
Variables storing values is nice, but sometimes it’s useful to be
able to store a function inside a variable. This is a common practice in
R (e.g., any of the *apply
functions), and also exists in C
in the form of function pointers.
Forth also incorporates a way to do this, using a unique word to put an “execution token” on the stack. An execution token is essentially just the location of a particular type of code. When you want to execute that token, Forth runs the code at the location referenced by the execution token.
This capability is implemented in froth
, but it does
have a few differences to classic Forths due to how the memory is
abstracted. Let’s start with a simple example:
fr> : GREET ." Hello!" ;
ok.
fr> GREET
Hello! ok.
fr> ' GREET .
executable token < greet > ok.
fr> ' GREET EXECUTE
Hello! ok.
We have two new words here: '
and EXECUTE
.
The first of these, '
(pronounced “tick”), creates an
execution token for the word that follows it, then pushes it to the
stack. If we print this value out, we get
executable token < greet >
. Forth languages would
traditionally return memory location, but froth
just shows
the word that the execution token corresponds to. The second word,
EXECUTE
, does just that: it executes the execution token at
the top of the stack.
In a way, ' GREET EXECUTE
is just a really roundabout
way of accomplishing the same thing as just calling GREET
directly. Naturally, one might wonder what the purpose of this is. We
can use '
to store functions in variables so we can
indirectly execute them later on. Let’s see how to do this with
an example:
fr> : HELLO ." Hello" ;
ok.
fr> : GOODBYE ." Goodbye" ;
ok.
fr> VARIABLE 'aloha ' HELLO 'aloha !
ok.
fr> : ALOHA 'aloha @ EXECUTE ;
ok.
I’ll show what happened in a minute, but I’d encourage readers to
first think about this code. What’s going on here? What would running
'aloha
do? Read through the code, then continue on to the
explanation below.
The first two lines should be simple by now. We’ve defined two
functions, HELLO
and GOODBYE
, that simply
print out Hello
and Goodbye
(respectively).
Then, we initialize a variable called 'aloha
, and store an
execution token for HELLO
inside that variable. Finally, we
define a function ALOHA
that executes the execution token
stored in 'aloha
.
This implies two things. First, if we run ALOHA
, we
should expect it to call HELLO
:
fr> ALOHA
Hello ok.
And indeed it does. Secondly, if we store a different function
pointer in 'aloha
and then call ALOHA
, we
should expect to see a different result:
fr> ' GOODBYE 'aloha !
ok.
fr> ALOHA
Goodbye ok.
Here lies the power of execution tokens. Using a single variable, we can call multiple functions!
I’ll also note that we called our variable 'aloha
(“tick-aloha”). This convention of preceding the variable name with a
'
is used in Forth to denote variables that store execution
pointers.
There is a one major difference here between Forth and
froth
. froth
is completely interpreted, and
thus does not distinguish between variable definition lines and
non-definition lines. What this means for Forth programmers is that the
froth
word '
is equivalent to the Forth word
[']
when used in a definition context. froth
cannot look at the input stream, and will instead always look at the
next word on the execution stack. I’m thinking of changing this to be
more consistent with Forth in the future, but I haven’t gotten to it
yet.
This implications of this are demonstrated by the following:
fr> : SAY ' 'aloha ! ;
ok.
fr> SAY HELLO
Error: can't find 'aloha
fr> : COMING ' HELLO 'aloha ! ;
ok.
fr> : GOING ' GOODBYE 'aloha ! ;
ok.
fr> COMING ALOHA GOING ALOHA
Hello Goodbye ok.
In traditional Forth, the GOING
definition would be
: GOING ['] GOODBYE 'aloha ! ;
, and SAY HELLO
would not produce an error. However, this isn’t the case here.
[']
is also provided as an alias for '
. Again,
I plan to change this eventually.
VARIABLE xxx
: creates a variable named
xxx
! ( n addr -- )
: stores the value n
at
address addr
@ ( addr -- n )
: copies the value at addr
to the stack? ( addr -- )
: prints the value of
addr
+! ( n addr -- )
: adds the value n
to the
value at addr
CONSTANT xxx (n -- )
: creates a constant called
xxx
that stores n
; xxx
returns
n
when calledALLOT ( addr ncells -- )
: allocates ncells
cells at addr
CREATE xxx y1 , y2 , ... yn ,
: creates an array
xxx
with values y1, y2, ... yn
CELLS ( n -- )
: creates a memory address offset for
arraysFILL ( addr ncells val -- )
: fills ncells
cells of memory beginning at addr
with
val
ERASE ( addr ncells -- )
: fills ncells
cells of memory beginning at addr
with 0REALLOT ( addr ncells -- )
: reallots array at
addr
to have size ncells
.EXTEND ( addr ncells -- )
: extends the array at
addr
by ncells
cellsLENGTH ( addr -- len )
: pushes the length of the array
at addr
onto the stackLENGTH? ( addr -- )
: prints the length of the array at
addr
' xxx ( -- addr )
: attempts to find xxx
in
the dictionary, and pushes an execution token for xxx
to
the stack if foundEXECUTE ( xt -- )
: executes an execution token on top
of the stack['] xxx ( -- addr )
: currently equivalent to
'
for froth
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.