The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.

datagrade 0.2.0

Scoring now follows the ISO/IEC 25012 data quality model: five inherent characteristics, fifteen quality properties, each measured as a ratio A / B over counted data items in the form ISO/IEC 25024 measurement functions take. Every statistic the package computes is unchanged; what changed is how those statistics are organised into scores.

New

• dg_spec() declares what the data is supposed to look like — required columns, permitted domains, valid ranges, regular expressions, referential sets, per-record rules, credibility criteria, provenance and update expectations. Nine of the fifteen properties have a denominator that counts the items for which an expectation is defined, which no data set contains; this is where it comes from. Every argument is optional.
• report$measures is a fifteen-row data frame giving each property’s ISO code, characteristic, value, A, B, whether it applied, and — when it did not — which dg_spec() argument would make it apply.
• Six properties are computable with no spec at all: COMP_REG, COMP_VAL_ESP, FAL_COMP_FICH, RIES_INCO, CONS_FORM and CONV_ACT. FAL_COMP_FICH catches cells that are occupied but empty ("N/A", "unknown", "-999"); CONS_FORM measures each column against its own dominant format, excluding free text rather than scoring it near zero.

Breaking

• report$scores now holds the five ISO characteristics — accuracy, completeness, consistency, credibility, currentness — where it held four dimensions.
• timeliness is renamed currentness, which is ISO’s word for it. report$timeliness still resolves and weights still accepts the old name.
• accuracy is NA unless a spec declares an interval, pattern or reference. All three ISO accuracy properties require a declared expectation. The old measure — outliers against an interval derived from the data — is unchanged, reported as report$plausibility, and excluded from the overall score, because an outlier need not be wrong and a wrong value can sit exactly on the mean.
• Completeness counts cells, not the average of per-column missing rates. The old quantity remains derivable from report$missing$columns.
• Scores are ratios in 0–1, where they were on the dissertation’s 0–10 scale. Percentages are unchanged, so every reported percentage reads exactly as before. Code comparing raw scores against 0–10 thresholds needs its cut-offs divided by ten; the good/warning/serious/critical bands now break at 0.9, 0.7 and 0.5.
• A characteristic with no applicable property is NA and is dropped from the aggregate rather than scored zero. NA is a statement that B could not be counted, not a claim about the data.
• summary()$scores names its first column characteristic, not dimension, and summary() gains a measures table.

Correctness

• dg_assess() no longer aborts on its own default of verbose = TRUE. Progress messages are interpolated by cli in the frame of the caller, which was the internal say() helper rather than dg_assess(), so every message referring to a local variable failed.

datagrade 0.1.0

First release. Implements the data quality framework from Demirhan (2024), MSc dissertation, University of Greenwich.

Interface

• dg_assess() assesses a data frame or file and returns a dg_report object, with print(), summary(), plot() and as.data.frame() methods. data_quality_assessment() is kept as an alias.
• The data argument works. The dissertation documented it in three places and implemented it in none.
• dg_plots() returns figures as a named list of ggplot objects; dg_save_plots() writes them to disk.
• All thirteen checks are exported and usable on their own.
• Dependencies reduced to cli, ggplot2 and base R. dplyr, car, moments, reshape2, DescTools, mice and caret are no longer needed; mice and caret were never used by the original code at all.

Correctness

• Consistency is scored as a ratio in 0–1 like every other dimension. It was previously multiplied by ten as though it were on a 0–10 scale, which is why the dissertation reports 2.5% for iris where 25% was meant.
• flag_redundant_columns() no longer reports the literal strings "row" and "col" as redundant data columns.
• Figures are actually produced. ggplot(...) + theme_minimal() %>% print() printed the theme and discarded the plot.
• Kurtosis is excess kurtosis, matching the dissertation’s stated formula rather than moments::kurtosis().
• Identifier detection runs before the storage-type tests, so the "ID" branch is reachable. A numeric column qualifies only if its values are whole numbers, so continuous measurements are not mistaken for keys and dropped.
• Dates are parsed before text normalisation, so timeliness is measurable from a CSV.
• Text normalisation is Unicode-aware and non-destructive by default.
• Outliers are counted on observed values rather than mean-imputed ones.
• Nothing is written to the global environment.
• The caller’s data frame is never modified.

Robustness

Regression tests cover constant columns, single-column frames, all-NA columns, zero-row frames, perfect collinearity and single redundant pairs — each of which produced an NA, an error or a silently wrong answer before.

Performance

• Duplicate detection rewritten from duplicated.data.frame to integer-coded row hashing: 10 million rows went from 494 s to 38 s, bit-identical result.
• VIF computed as diag(solve(cor(X))), which is independent of row count.
• Figures built from precomputed bin counts and five-number summaries, so they render in constant time and the report object stays at ~83 KB regardless of input size.
• Shapiro-Wilk and the anomaly model use deterministic subsampling that neither depends on nor disturbs the caller’s random state.

Known limitations

• Not ISO/IEC 25024 measure-conformant. Dimension names follow ISO/IEC 25012; the measures are this package’s own. Genuine X = A/B measures require metadata that zero-configuration assessment does not have. See vignette("methodology").
• credibility, the fifth ISO/IEC 25012 inherent characteristic, is not measured.
• The accuracy score substitutes a statistically derived interval for a specified one, so it measures plausibility rather than accuracy in the ISO sense.
• Cost grows as O(p^3) in the column count through the VIF matrix inversion. Fine for hundreds of columns, not for tens of thousands.

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.