The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
Dagitty is a software to analyze causal diagrams, also known as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). Structural equation models (SEMs) can be viewed as a parametric form of DAGs, which encode linear functions instead of arbitrary nonlinear functions.
Because every SEM is a DAG, much of the methodology developed for DAGs is of potentially great interest for SEM users as well. In this vignette, I am going to show some possibilities. This follows the structure of Kyono’s “Commentator” program (http://ftp.cs.ucla.edu/pub/stat_ser/r364.pdf), and thereby also shows how the tasks implemented in that program can be solved using the dagitty package.
<- dagitty( "dag {
g1 W1 -> Z1 -> X -> Y
Z1 <- V -> Z2
W2 -> Z2 -> Y
X <-> W1 <-> W2 <-> Y
}")
<- dagitty( "dag {
g2 Y <- X <- Z1 <- V -> Z2 -> Y
Z1 <- W1 <-> W2 -> Z2
X <- W1 -> Y
X <- W2 -> Y
}")
plot(graphLayout(g1))
print( impliedConditionalIndependencies( g1 ) )
V _||_ W1
V _||_ W2
V _||_ X | W1, Z1
V _||_ Y | W1, W2, Z1, Z2
W1 _||_ Z2 | W2
W2 _||_ Z1 | W1
X _||_ Z2 | V, W2
X _||_ Z2 | W1, W2, Z1
Z1 _||_ Z2 | V, W2
Z1 _||_ Z2 | V, W1
print( adjustmentSets( g1, "Z1", "X", effect="direct" ) )
{ W1 }
print( adjustmentSets( g2, "X", "Y", effect="direct" ) )
{ W1, W2, Z2 }
{ V, W1, W2 }
{ W1, W2, Z1 }
for( n in names(g1) ){
for( m in children(g1,n) ){
<- adjustmentSets( g1, n, m, effect="direct" )
a if( length(a) > 0 ){
cat("The coefficient on ",n,"->",m,
" is identifiable controlling for:\n",sep="")
print( a, prefix=" * " )
}
} }
The coefficient on V->Z1 is identifiable controlling for:
* {}
The coefficient on V->Z2 is identifiable controlling for:
* {}
The coefficient on W1->Z1 is identifiable controlling for:
* {}
The coefficient on W2->Z2 is identifiable controlling for:
* {}
The coefficient on Z1->X is identifiable controlling for:
{ W1 }
The coefficient on Z2->Y is identifiable controlling for:
{ W1, W2, Z1 }
{ V, W2 }
print( adjustmentSets( g1, "X", "Y" ) )
print( adjustmentSets( g2, "X", "Y" ) )
{ W1, W2, Z2 }
{ V, W1, W2 }
{ W1, W2, Z1 }
for( n in names(g1) ){
for( m in setdiff( descendants( g1, n ), n ) ){
<- adjustmentSets( g1, n, m )
a if( length(a) > 0 ){
cat("The total effect of ",n," on ",m,
" is identifiable controlling for:\n",sep="")
print( a, prefix=" * " )
}
} }
The total effect of V on Z2 is identifiable controlling for:
* {}
The total effect of V on Y is identifiable controlling for:
* {}
The total effect of V on Z1 is identifiable controlling for:
* {}
The total effect of V on X is identifiable controlling for:
* {}
The total effect of W1 on Z1 is identifiable controlling for:
* {}
The total effect of W2 on Z2 is identifiable controlling for:
* {}
The total effect of Z1 on X is identifiable controlling for:
{ W1 }
The total effect of Z1 on Y is identifiable controlling for:
{ W1, W2, Z2 }
{ V, W1 }
The total effect of Z2 on Y is identifiable controlling for:
{ W1, W2, Z1 }
{ V, W2 }
for( n in names(g1) ){
for( m in children(g1,n) ){
<- instrumentalVariables( g1, n, m )
iv if( length( iv ) > 0 ){
cat( n, m, "\n" )
print( iv , prefix=" * " )
}
} }
V Z1
* Z2 | W1
V Z2
* X | W2
* Z1 | W2
W1 Z1
* W2
* Z2 | V
W2 Z2
* W1
* X | V
* Z1 | V
X Y
* V | W2, Z2
* Z1 | W1, W2, Z2
Z1 X
* V
* W2
* Z2
Z2 Y
* V | X
* W1 | X
* Z1 | X
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.