The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
The development repository for cpp11 is https://github.com/r-lib/cpp11.
First install any dependencies needed for development.
You can load the package in an interactive R session
Or run the cpp11 tests with
There are more extensive tests in the cpp11test
directory. Generally when developing the C++ headers I run R with its
working directory in the cpp11test
directory and use
devtools::test()
to run the cpp11tests.
If you change the cpp11 headers you will need to install the new version of cpp11 and then clean and recompile the cpp11test package:
To calculate code coverage of the cpp11 package run the following
from the cpp11
root directory.
This project uses clang-format (version 10) to automatically format the c++ code.
You can run make format
to re-format all code in the
project. If your system does not have clang-format
version
10, this can be installed using a homebrew tap at the
command line with
brew install r-lib/taps/clang-format@10
.
You may need to link the newly installed version 10. To do so, run
brew unlink clang-format
followed by
brew link clang-format@10
.
Alternatively many IDEs support automatically running
clang-format
every time files are written.
cpp11 is a header only library, so all source code exposed to users
lives in inst/include.
R code used to register functions and for
cpp11::cpp_source()
is in R/. Tests for
only the code in R/
is in tests/testthat/.
The rest of the code is in a separate cpp11test/
package included in the source tree. Inside cpp11test/src
the files that start with test-
are C++ tests using the Catch
support in testthat. In addition there are some regular R tests in cpp11test/tests/testthat/.
.hpp
extension..cpp
extension.inst/include/cpp11
cpp11
namespace.cpp11::writable
namespace.cpp11::internal
namespace.All of the basic r_vector classes are class templates, the base
template is defined in cpp11/r_vector.hpp.
The template parameter is the type of value the
particular R vector stores, e.g. double
for
cpp11::doubles
. This differs from Rcpp, whose first
template parameter is the R vector type, e.g. REALSXP
.
The file first has the class declarations, then function definitions further down in the file. Specializations for the various types are in separate files, e.g. cpp11/doubles.hpp, cpp11/integers.hpp
There are two different coercion functions
as_sexp()
takes a C++ object and coerces it to a SEXP
object, so it can be used in R. as_cpp<>()
is a
template function that takes a SEXP and creates a C++ object from it
The various methods for both functions are defined in cpp11/as.hpp
This is definitely the most complex part of the cpp11 code, with extensive use of template metaprogramming. In particular the substitution failure is not an error (SFINAE) technique is used to control overloading of the functions. If we could use C++20 a lot of this code would be made simpler with Concepts, but alas.
The most common C++ types are included in the test suite and should work without issues, as more exotic types are used in real projects additional issues may arise.
Some useful links on SFINAE
cpp11 uses an idea proposed by Luke Tierney to use a double linked list with the head preserved to protect objects cpp11 is protecting.
Each node in the list uses the head (CAR
) part to point
to the previous node, and the CDR
part to point to the next
node. The TAG
is used to point to the object being
protected. The head and tail of the list have R_NilValue
as
their CAR
and CDR
pointers respectively.
Calling cpp11::detail::store::insert()
with a regular R
object will add a new node to the list and return a protect token
corresponding to the node added. Calling
cpp11::detail::store::release()
on this returned token will
release the protection by unlinking the node from the linked list. These
two functions are considered internal to cpp11, so do not use them in
your packages.
This scheme scales in O(1) time to release or insert an object vs
O(N) or worse time with R_PreserveObject()
/
R_ReleaseObject()
.
Each package has its own unique protection list, which avoids the need to manage a “global” protection list shared across packages. A previous version of cpp11 used a global protection list stored in an R global option, but this caused multiple issues.
These functions are defined in protect.hpp.
cpp11 uses R_UnwindProtect()
to protect (most) calls to
the R API that could fail. These are usually those that allocate memory,
though in truth most R API functions could error along some paths. If an
error happens under R_UnwindProtect()
, cpp11 will throw a
C++ exception. This exception is caught by the try/catch block defined
in the BEGIN_CPP11
macro in cpp11/declarations.hpp.
The exception will cause any C++ destructors to run, freeing any
resources held by C++ objects. After the try/catch block exits, the R
error unwinding is then continued by R_ContinueUnwind()
and
a normal R error results.
We require R >=3.5 to use cpp11, but when it was created we wanted
to support back to R 3.3, but R_ContinueUnwind()
wasn’t
available until R 3.5. Below are a few other options we considered to
support older R versions:
R_TopLevelExec()
works to avoid the C long jump,
but because the code is always run in a top level context any errors or
messages thrown cannot be caught by tryCatch()
or similar
techniques.R_TryCatch()
is not available prior to R 3.4, and
also has a serious bug in R 3.4 (fixed in R 3.5).tryCatch()
function which contains
an expression that runs a C function which then runs the C++ code would
be an option, but implementing this is convoluted and it would impact
performance, perhaps severely.cpp11::unwind_protect()
be a no-op for these
versions. This means any resources held by C++ objects would leak,
including cpp11::r_vector
/ cpp11::sexp
objects.None of these options were perfect, here are some pros and cons for each.
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.