The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
The {comorbidity} R package can be used to identify comorbidity conditions and calculate comorbidity scores based on ICD codes data. Supported mapping and weighting algorithms are described below, including relevant references.
Examples showing how to apply each algorithm are included in a separate vignette.
The {comorbidity} package can apply comorbidity mappings
corresponding to the Charlson and the Elixhauser comorbidity scores.
Both ICD-9 and ICD-10 coding systems are supported, with algorithms
described in the paper by Quan et al. (2005). The resulting mapping
algorithms are denoted with charlson_icd9_quan
and
charlson_icd10_quan
for the Charlson score (based on ICD-9
and ICD-10 systems, respectively), elixhauser_icd9_quan
and
elixhauser_icd10_quan
for the Elixhauser score.
Furthermore, the Swedish (Ludvigsson et al., 2021) and Australian
(Sundararajan et al., 2004) modifications of the Charlson score are
implemented as well, and identified by charlson_icd10_se
and charlson_icd10_am
respectively.
Different weighting algorithms have been proposed to combine the different conditions into a single measure, for both the Charlson and the Elixhauser index.
Currently, the following weighting algorithms are supported for the Charlson score:
The original weights by Charlson et al. (1987), denoted with
charlson
;
Updated weights by Quan et al. (2011), denoted with
quan
.
Then, for the Elixhauser score:
Weights proposed by van Walraven et al. (2009), denoted with
vw
;
The Swiss weights modification by Sharma et al. (2021), denoted
with swiss
.
Charlson ME et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases 1987; 40:373-383. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
Elixhauser A et al. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Medical Care 1998; 36(1):8-27. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004
Ludvigsson JF et al. Adaptation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index for register-based research in Sweden. Clinical Epidemiology 2021; 13:21–41. DOI: 10.2147/clep.s282475
Quan H et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Medical Care 2005; 43(11):1130-1139. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83
Quan H et al. Updating and validating the Charlson Comorbidity Index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. American Journal of Epidemiology 2011;173(6):676-82. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq433
Sharma N et al. Comparing Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices with different weightings to predict in-hospital mortality: an analysis of national inpatient data. BMC Health Services Research 2021; 21(1). DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05999-5
Sundararajan V et al. New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2004; 57(12):1288-1294. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.012
van Walraven C, Austin PC, Jennings A, Quan H and Forster AJ. A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data. Medical Care 2009; 47(6):626-633. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819432e5
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.