Offsets integrity primer: reading ACCUs after the Chubb Review

The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.

Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) are not fungible after Chubb (2022). Different methods have different integrity profiles; some methods are under active review by the Independent Integrity Assurance Committee; some are suspended. A headline figure like “185 million ACCUs issued to date” is only meaningful once decomposed by integrity tier.

What changed after Chubb (2022)

The Independent Review of Australian Carbon Credit Units (Chubb, December 2022) identified five ACCU methods for specific attention:

Human-Induced Regeneration (HIR). Recommended replacement by a new Integrated Farm and Land Management (IFLM) method.
Avoided Deforestation. Closed to new project registrations.
Landfill Gas. Tightened baseline-crediting expectations.
Soil Carbon. Strengthened Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) requirements.
Plantings (2014 method). Superseded by the 2024 FullCAM method.

Independent academic critique (Macintosh et al. 2022, ANU) was sharper on HIR specifically. The live debate is continuing.

Query the integrity scorecard

library(cer)
cer_snapshot("2026-04-24")

all_methods <- cer_method_integrity()
all_methods[, c("method_short", "status", "integrity_tier", "chubb_affected")]

Filter to contested methods

contested <- cer_method_integrity(tier = "contested")
contested[, c("method_short", "method_full_name", "status")]

Aggregating ACCUs by integrity tier

projects <- cer_accu_projects(status = "all")

by_tier <- cer_accu_aggregate(projects,
                               value_col = "accus_issued",
                               warn_contested_pct = 0.05)
by_tier

The function emits a warning when contested-integrity methods account for more than 5 per cent of the total : a signal that a single headline figure is not appropriate.

Warnings when querying a suspended method

# Will emit a post-Chubb integrity warning
ad <- cer_accu_projects(method = "avoided deforestation",
                         status = "all")

Linking to the authoritative determination

cer_method_determination("HIR")
cer_legislative_instrument("F2019C00664")

Rule of thumb

If your analysis depends on an aggregate ACCU figure, report three numbers: total, high-integrity share, and contested share. A reviewer will ask for this breakdown; better to have it in the table than in a footnote.

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.