The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
In random forests, each tree is grown with a bootstrapped version of the training set. Because bootstrap samples are selected with replacement, each bootstrapped training set contains about two-thirds of instances in the original training set. The ‘out-of-bag’ data are instances that are not in the bootstrapped training set.
Each tree in the random forest can make predictions for its out-of-bag data, and the out-of-bag predictions can be aggregated to make an ensemble out-of-bag prediction. Since the out-of-bag data are not used to grow the tree, the accuracy of the ensemble out-of-bag predictions approximate the generalization error of the random forest. Out-of-bag prediction error plays a central role for some routines that estimate variable importance, e.g. negation importance.
We fit an oblique random survival forest and plot the distribution of the ensemble out-of-bag predictions.
fit <- orsf(data = pbc_orsf,
formula = Surv(time, status) ~ . - id,
oobag_pred_type = 'surv',
n_tree = 5,
oobag_pred_horizon = 2000)
hist(fit$pred_oobag,
main = 'Out-of-bag survival predictions at t=2,000')
Next, let’s check the out-of-bag accuracy of fit
:
# what function is used to evaluate out-of-bag predictions?
fit$eval_oobag$stat_type
#> [1] "Harrell's C-index"
# what is the output from this function?
fit$eval_oobag$stat_values
#> [,1]
#> [1,] 0.7728356
The out-of-bag estimate of Harrell’s C-index (the default method to evaluate out-of-bag predictions) is 0.7728356.
As each out-of-bag data set contains about one-third of the training
set, the out-of-bag error estimate usually converges to a stable value
as more trees are added to the forest. If you want to monitor the
convergence of out-of-bag error for your own oblique random survival
forest, you can set oobag_eval_every
to compute out-of-bag
error at every oobag_eval_every
tree. For example, let’s
compute out-of-bag error after fitting each tree in a forest of 50
trees:
fit <- orsf(data = pbc_orsf,
formula = Surv(time, status) ~ . - id,
n_tree = 20,
tree_seeds = 2,
oobag_pred_type = 'surv',
oobag_pred_horizon = 2000,
oobag_eval_every = 1)
plot(
x = seq(1, 20, by = 1),
y = fit$eval_oobag$stat_values,
main = 'Out-of-bag C-statistic computed after each new tree is grown.',
xlab = 'Number of trees grown',
ylab = fit$eval_oobag$stat_type
)
lines(x=seq(1, 20), y = fit$eval_oobag$stat_values)
In general, at least 500 trees are recommended for a random forest fit. We’re just using 10 for illustration.
In some cases, you may want more control over how out-of-bag error is
estimated. For example, let’s use the Brier score from the
SurvMetrics
package:
oobag_brier_surv <- function(y_mat, w_vec, s_vec){
# use if SurvMetrics is available
if(requireNamespace("SurvMetrics")){
return(
# output is numeric vector of length 1
as.numeric(
SurvMetrics::Brier(
object = Surv(time = y_mat[, 1], event = y_mat[, 2]),
pre_sp = s_vec,
# t_star in Brier() should match oob_pred_horizon in orsf()
t_star = 2000
)
)
)
}
# if not available, use a dummy version
mean( (y_mat[,2] - (1-s_vec))^2 )
}
There are two ways to apply your own function to compute out-of-bag error. First, you can apply your function to the out-of-bag survival predictions that are stored in ‘aorsf’ objects, e.g:
oobag_brier_surv(y_mat = pbc_orsf[,c('time', 'status')],
s_vec = fit$pred_oobag)
#> Loading required namespace: SurvMetrics
#> [1] 0.11869
Second, you can pass your function into orsf()
, and it
will be used in place of Harrell’s C-statistic:
# instead of copy/pasting the modeling code and then modifying it,
# you can just use orsf_update.
fit_brier <- orsf_update(fit, oobag_fun = oobag_brier_surv)
plot(
x = seq(1, 20, by = 1),
y = fit_brier$eval_oobag$stat_values,
main = 'Out-of-bag error computed after each new tree is grown.',
sub = 'For the Brier score, lower values indicate more accurate predictions',
xlab = 'Number of trees grown',
ylab = "Brier score"
)
lines(x=seq(1, 20), y = fit_brier$eval_oobag$stat_values)
if you use your own oobag_fun
note the following:
oobag_fun
should have three inputs:
y_mat
, w_vec
, and s_vec
For survival trees, y_mat
should be a two column
matrix with first column named ‘time’ and second named ‘status’. For
classification trees, y_mat
should be a matrix with number
of columns = number of distinct classes in the outcome. For regression,
y_mat
should be a matrix with one column.
s_vec
is a numeric vector containing
predictions
oobag_fun
should return a numeric output of length
1
When evaluating out-of-bag error:
the oobag_pred_horizon
input in orsf()
determines the prediction horizon for out-of-bag predictions. The
prediction horizon needs to be specified to evaluate prediction accuracy
in some cases, such as the examples above. Be sure to check if that is
the case when using your own functions, and if so, be sure that
oobag_pred_horizon
matches the prediction horizon used in
your custom function.
Some functions expect predicted risk (i.e., 1 - predicted survival), others expect predicted survival.
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.