The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
agriME is an R package for reproducible agricultural
marketing-efficiency and price-spread analysis. It works with either
channel-level totals or a full stage-by-stage chain such as Producer
-> Wholesaler -> Retailer -> Consumer.
| Output | Definition used |
|---|---|
| Price spread | Consumer price minus net producer price |
| Price-spread percentage | Price spread divided by consumer price, times 100 |
| Producer’s share | Net producer price divided by consumer price, times 100 |
| Total gross marketing margin | Same monetary gap as price spread when the producer price is net |
| Acharya efficiency | Net producer price divided by total marketing cost plus net intermediary margin |
| Shepherd efficiency | Consumer price divided by total marketing cost; an optional net-ratio variant subtracts one |
| Conventional efficiency | Value added by marketing divided by total marketing cost |
Install the checked source tarball supplied with the release bundle:
install.packages("agriME_0.1.0.tar.gz", repos = NULL, type = "source")
library(agriME)After publication on CRAN, installation will be:
install.packages("agriME")
library(agriME)marketing_metrics(
producer_price = 1900,
consumer_price = 3150,
marketing_cost = 510,
marketing_margin = 740,
channel = "Producer-Wholesaler-Retailer"
)data(tomato_channels)
fit <- analyse_channels(tomato_channels)
fit
summary(fit)
consumer_rupee(fit)
rank_channels(fit)
plot(fit, type = "decomposition")
plot(fit, type = "efficiency")The required stage-level fields are:
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
channel |
Channel identifier |
stage |
Integer order within the channel |
actor |
Producer or intermediary name |
actor_type |
producer for exactly one first-stage row; otherwise
intermediary |
purchase_price |
Actor purchase price per common unit; use 0 or NA for
producer |
sale_price |
Actor sale price per the same unit |
marketing_cost |
Actor marketing cost per the same unit |
Use equivalent commodity quality, form, time, location, and quantity across channels. The validator reports broken price links and accounting gaps rather than silently treating inconsistent records as efficiency differences.
data(market_observations)
ci <- bootstrap_marketing_metrics(
market_observations,
channel = "channel",
R = 499,
seed = 2026
)
ci
plot(ci, metric = "acharya_efficiency")sens <- marketing_sensitivity(
producer_price = 1900,
consumer_price = 3150,
marketing_cost = 510,
marketing_margin = 740,
producer_change = c(-0.05, 0, 0.05),
cost_change = c(-0.10, 0, 0.10)
)
sens
plot(sens, metric = "acharya_efficiency")
efficiency_target(
target = 2,
method = "acharya",
solve_for = "marketing_cost",
producer_price = 1900,
marketing_margin = 740
)Efficiency ratios are descriptive accounting indicators. A high ratio does not, by itself, prove that a channel is competitive, equitable, causally superior, or socially optimal. Added services, quality transformation, risk bearing, losses, seasonality, and transaction volume must be considered when comparing channels.
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.