The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
qpAdm model fitting is a complex topic. To navigate it successfuly requires solid knowledge of the \(f\)-statistics theory first introduced by Nick Patterson and colleagues in 2012. As part of our tutorial, we have looked at a very basic overview of the qpAdm-related functionality implemented in admixr. We also talked about the most important resources for learning more about this powerful method pioneered by Iosif Lazaridis in 2015.
Recently, Harney et al. published an exciting new preprint called “Assessing the Performance of qpAdm: A Statistical Tool for Studying Population Admixture”. Before we go any further, I encourage everyone to read it and the superb tutorial/guide available as its supplementary pdf on bioRxiv. There really isn't a better source of information on how to run and interpret qpAdm analyses.
Please, only attempt to run qpAdm if you have familiarized yoursef with all of the above-mentioned resources. I have had many people ask questions via email (not only about qpAdm but also other topics) to which the only sensible answer was - “you have to read the papers and understand the statistics first.” I know it's frustrating but there really are no shortcuts here.
If you have ever worked with qpAdm, you are well aware of the intricacies of finding the most suitable set of models that can explain the data. Among other things, we have to make a decision about the number of admixture sources and which populations are the most appropriate surrogates for those source populations (because only rarely we have sampled them directly). Furthermore, we need to carefully choose a number of so called 'outgroup' populations (also called 'references' or 'right' populations, depending on whom you talk to).
The preprint by Harney et al. described an interesting idea to find a set of the most appropriate models (i.e. combinations of source and outgroup populations) which has been sucessfully used in the past. They call the method a “rotating population” strategy.
This approach starts by defining a set of “candidate” populations from which we iteratively sample a defined number of “sources” of ancestry for our “target” population of interest (most commonly two or three sources). After removing the sources from the candidate list, we then define all the remaining populations as “outgroups”. Finally, we iteratively fit qpAdm models for each combination of target, sources and outgroups, extracting \(p\)-values and other statistics of interest. After finishing the exhaustive fitting of source-outgroup combinations, we examine all explored models, selecting those that seem most appropriate.
In admixr, I have implemented a function qpAdm_rotation() which
does exactly what is described paragraph with one additional
feature. Given the sensitivity of qpAdm to large numbers of
potential outgroups (references), for each combination of sources and
outgroups we also explore models for all possible subsets of
outgroups. This is to find models which are as small as possible,
possibly determining which outgroups are potentially redundant and not
actually needed.
Let's say that we have a target population T and a set of candidates for potential sources and outgroups C = {a, b, c, d, e, f}. Then, if we imagine an iteration of the rotation scheme in which we fixed sources S = {a, b}, we have remaining candidates for outgroups C - S = {c, d, e, f}. The basic implementation of the rotation procedure would simply take C - S as the full set of outgroups and fitted the following model:
However, in admixr, we would evaluate the following models in addition to the model #1:
Therefore, our implementation in qpAdm_rotation() explores all
posible outgroup combinations, allowing us to look for the smallest
model (in terms of outgroup size) that can explain our data.
As an example, let's revisit the problem of estimating the level of Neandertal ancestry in a French person from the main tutorial. We use this as an illustration because:
First, let's download and install a development version of admixr to get access to the new features, and download a small example data set:
library(admixr)
snps <- eigenstrat(download_data(dirname = tempdir()))
These are the individuals for which we have genotype data:
read_ind(snps)
#> # A tibble: 12 x 3
#> id sex label
#> <chr> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 Chimp U Chimp
#> 2 Mbuti U Mbuti
#> 3 Yoruba U Yoruba
#> 4 Khomani_San U Khomani_San
#> 5 Han U Han
#> 6 Dinka U Dinka
#> 7 Sardinian U Sardinian
#> 8 Papuan U Papuan
#> 9 French U French
#> 10 Vindija U Vindija
#> 11 Altai U Altai
#> 12 Denisova U Denisova
The qpAdm_rotation() function is very simple. It accepts:
minimize, determining whether to perform the
“minimization” of the outgroup size described in the previous
section,fulloutput specifying whether we want to have all the
“ranks” and “subsets/patterns” statistics (see the main tutorial for
more information) or if we just want the proportions of ancestry and
significance values for individual models (this is the default, i.e.
fulloutput = FALSE).So, let's say we are interested in finding the proportions of archaic human ancestry in a French individual, and we also want to see what sorts of possible models we could find that match archaic introgression. We would run the following:
models <- qpAdm_rotation(
data = snps,
target = "French",
candidates = c("Dinka", "Mbuti", "Yoruba", "Vindija", "Altai", "Denisova", "Chimp"),
minimize = TRUE,
nsources = 2,
ncores = 2,
fulloutput = TRUE
)
Here is what the full output looks like:
models
#> $proportions
#> # A tibble: 336 x 13
#> model target source1 source2 outgroups noutgroups pvalue prop1 prop2
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <int> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 m1 French Dinka Mbuti Yoruba &… 3 3.37e-2 0.757 0.243
#> 2 m2 French Dinka Mbuti Yoruba &… 3 1.38e-2 0.774 0.226
#> 3 m3 French Dinka Mbuti Yoruba &… 3 1.14e-6 0.89 0.11
#> 4 m4 French Dinka Mbuti Yoruba &… 3 6.85e-2 0.781 0.219
#> 5 m5 French Dinka Mbuti Yoruba &… 3 1.49e-5 0.885 0.115
#> 6 m6 French Dinka Mbuti Yoruba &… 3 9.32e-3 0.887 0.113
#> 7 m7 French Dinka Mbuti Vindija … 3 6.70e-2 -8.51 9.51
#> 8 m8 French Dinka Mbuti Vindija … 3 2.71e-1 25.3 -24.3
#> 9 m9 French Dinka Mbuti Vindija … 3 1.61e-1 -187. 188.
#> 10 m10 French Dinka Mbuti Altai & … 3 8.10e-2 -30.7 31.7
#> # … with 326 more rows, and 4 more variables: stderr1 <dbl>, stderr2 <dbl>,
#> # nsnps_used <dbl>, nsnps_target <dbl>
#>
#> $ranks
#> # A tibble: 672 x 9
#> model target rank df chisq tail dfdiff chisqdiff taildiff
#> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 m1 French 1 1 4.51 0.0337 3 -4.51 1
#> 2 m1 French 2 0 0 1 1 4.51 0.0337
#> 3 m10 French 1 1 6.06 0.0138 3 -6.06 1
#> 4 m10 French 2 0 0 1 1 6.06 0.0138
#> 5 m100 French 1 1 23.7 0.00000114 3 -23.7 1
#> 6 m100 French 2 0 0 1 1 23.7 0.00000114
#> 7 m101 French 1 1 3.32 0.0685 3 -3.32 1
#> 8 m101 French 2 0 0 1 1 3.32 0.0685
#> 9 m102 French 1 1 18.8 0.0000149 3 -18.8 1
#> 10 m102 French 2 0 0 1 1 18.8 0.0000149
#> # … with 662 more rows
#>
#> $subsets
#> # A tibble: 1,008 x 12
#> model target source1 source2 pattern wt dof chisq tail prop1 prop2
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 m1 French Dinka Mbuti 00 0 1 4.51 3.37e-2 0.757 0.243
#> 2 m1 French Dinka Mbuti 01 1 2 23.6 7.35e-6 1 0
#> 3 m1 French Dinka Mbuti 10 1 2 160. 0. 0 1
#> 4 m10 French Dinka Mbuti 00 0 1 6.06 1.38e-2 0.774 0.226
#> 5 m10 French Dinka Mbuti 01 1 2 23.3 8.91e-6 1 0
#> 6 m10 French Dinka Mbuti 10 1 2 162. 0. 0 1
#> 7 m100 French Dinka Mbuti 00 0 1 23.7 1.14e-6 0.89 0.11
#> 8 m100 French Dinka Mbuti 01 1 2 28.8 5.66e-7 1 0
#> 9 m100 French Dinka Mbuti 10 1 2 285. 0. 0 1
#> 10 m101 French Dinka Mbuti 00 0 1 3.32 6.85e-2 0.781 0.219
#> # … with 998 more rows, and 1 more variable: comment <chr>
We can see a list with three components, as we would expect from any
other qpAdm() run (again, see the manual page and the tutorial for
description of all three elements and their meaning). The first column
of each component is always named model - this contains a short
identifier of each individual “rotation” run (i.e., a combination
target & sources & outgroups). It's values don't have any particular
meaning - the order is completely arbitrary!, This variable is useful
for later filtering and examination of individual models in detail.
Let's ignore the $ranks and $subsets elements for now. We will
focus only on the first element, $proportions which contains the
main qpAdm summary.
The $proportions table shown above contains information about all
models, regardless of their plausibility. We can see that by examining
the distributions of p-values (column pvalue) and admixture
proportions (columns prop1 and prop2) of each evaluated model in
the figure below.
Notice two things (each dot represents one examined qpAdm model):
library(tidyverse)
select(models$proportions, model, pvalue, prop1, prop2) %>%
gather(parameter, value, -model) %>%
ggplot(aes(parameter, value)) +
geom_jitter() +
facet_wrap(~ parameter, scales = "free")
To make it easier to narrow down the list of all models, admixr
package contains a function qpAdm_filter(). This function accepts
the result of the qpAdm_rotation() function (either the fulloutput
= TRUE version or the simple data frame with admixture proportions,
p-values etc. produced by usingfulloutput = FALSE) and filters out
models with any of the proportions outside of the [0, 1] range and
with p-values lower than a specified cutoff (0.05 by default):
# filter out models which can clearly be rejected
fits <- qpAdm_filter(models)
We can verify that the filtering worked by visualizing the filtered set of models again. Note that the p-values are distributed across the range of “insigificance” (i.e., “non-rejection”) between [0.05, 1.0]. Furthermore - remember that we originally set out to find combinations of sources-outgroups that model archaic ancestry in a French individual? We can clearly see two tidy clusters of estimated ancestry proportions. One is very small (this corresponds to the Neandertal component in modern humans - we would expect about 2-3% based on many previous analyses) and one large (“modern human” component, non-Neandertal ancestry):
select(fits$proportions, model, pvalue, prop1, prop2) %>%
gather(parameter, value, -model) %>%
ggplot(aes(parameter, value)) +
geom_jitter() +
facet_wrap(~ parameter, scales = "free") +
coord_cartesian(y = c(0, 1))
Let's now focus only on the proportions table. We will also ignore a couple of columns for brevity. Note that we are now also completely ignoring p-values because we cannot used those for model selection - they are not statistically meaningful at this stage! Higher p-value never implies higher likelihood of the model. Finally, we order the models based on the size of the outgroup set (smaller models first):
props <- fits$proportions %>%
arrange(noutgroups) %>%
select(-c(target, noutgroups, stderr1, stderr2, nsnps_used, nsnps_target))
print(props, n = Inf)
#> # A tibble: 56 x 7
#> model source1 source2 outgroups pvalue prop1 prop2
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 m81 Dinka Chimp Mbuti & Yoruba & Vindija 0.963 0.937 0.063
#> 2 m82 Dinka Chimp Mbuti & Yoruba & Altai 0.959 0.942 0.058
#> 3 m56 Dinka Altai Yoruba & Vindija & Chimp 0.898 0.973 0.027
#> 4 m40 Dinka Vindija Yoruba & Altai & Chimp 0.875 0.975 0.025
#> 5 m52 Dinka Altai Mbuti & Vindija & Denisova 0.829 0.977 0.023
#> 6 m183 Yoruba Vindija Mbuti & Altai & Denisova 0.826 0.993 0.007
#> 7 m83 Dinka Chimp Mbuti & Yoruba & Denisova 0.712 0.96 0.04
#> 8 m65 Dinka Denisova Mbuti & Yoruba & Vindija 0.712 0.96 0.04
#> 9 m66 Dinka Denisova Mbuti & Yoruba & Altai 0.672 0.963 0.037
#> 10 m41 Dinka Vindija Yoruba & Denisova & Chimp 0.603 0.97 0.03
#> 11 m57 Dinka Altai Yoruba & Denisova & Chimp 0.603 0.97 0.03
#> 12 m55 Dinka Altai Yoruba & Vindija & Denisova 0.599 0.974 0.026
#> 13 m199 Yoruba Altai Mbuti & Vindija & Denisova 0.562 0.991 0.009
#> 14 m36 Dinka Vindija Mbuti & Altai & Denisova 0.561 0.979 0.021
#> 15 m50 Dinka Altai Mbuti & Yoruba & Denisova 0.550 0.973 0.027
#> 16 m34 Dinka Vindija Mbuti & Yoruba & Denisova 0.548 0.973 0.027
#> 17 m49 Dinka Altai Mbuti & Yoruba & Vindija 0.527 0.975 0.025
#> 18 m33 Dinka Vindija Mbuti & Yoruba & Altai 0.504 0.977 0.023
#> 19 m51 Dinka Altai Mbuti & Yoruba & Chimp 0.460 0.981 0.019
#> 20 m35 Dinka Vindija Mbuti & Yoruba & Chimp 0.459 0.981 0.019
#> 21 m67 Dinka Denisova Mbuti & Yoruba & Chimp 0.448 0.982 0.018
#> 22 m37 Dinka Vindija Mbuti & Altai & Chimp 0.400 0.977 0.023
#> 23 m58 Dinka Altai Vindija & Denisova & Chimp 0.367 0.972 0.028
#> 24 m39 Dinka Vindija Yoruba & Altai & Denisova 0.360 0.977 0.023
#> 25 m233 Yoruba Chimp Mbuti & Altai & Denisova 0.343 0.988 0.012
#> 26 m42 Dinka Vindija Altai & Denisova & Chimp 0.291 0.976 0.024
#> 27 m53 Dinka Altai Mbuti & Vindija & Chimp 0.290 0.974 0.026
#> 28 m38 Dinka Vindija Mbuti & Denisova & Chimp 0.198 0.975 0.025
#> 29 m54 Dinka Altai Mbuti & Denisova & Chimp 0.197 0.975 0.025
#> 30 m232 Yoruba Chimp Mbuti & Vindija & Denisova 0.123 0.986 0.014
#> 31 m202 Yoruba Altai Vindija & Denisova & Chimp 0.0983 0.974 0.026
#> 32 m68 Dinka Denisova Mbuti & Vindija & Altai 0.0809 0.964 0.036
#> 33 m215 Yoruba Denisova Mbuti & Vindija & Altai 0.0788 0.988 0.012
#> 34 m231 Yoruba Chimp Mbuti & Vindija & Altai 0.0751 0.98 0.02
#> 35 m186 Yoruba Vindija Altai & Denisova & Chimp 0.0699 0.978 0.022
#> 36 m84 Dinka Chimp Mbuti & Vindija & Altai 0.0698 0.942 0.058
#> 37 m71 Dinka Denisova Yoruba & Vindija & Altai 0.0687 0.96 0.04
#> 38 m4 Dinka Mbuti Yoruba & Altai & Denisova 0.0685 0.781 0.219
#> 39 m87 Dinka Chimp Yoruba & Vindija & Altai 0.0608 0.941 0.059
#> 40 m74 Dinka Denisova Vindija & Altai & Chimp 0.0507 0.922 0.078
#> 41 m63 Dinka Altai Yoruba & Vindija & Denisova & Chimp 0.788 0.973 0.027
#> 42 m59 Dinka Altai Mbuti & Yoruba & Vindija & Denisova 0.770 0.976 0.024
#> 43 m44 Dinka Vindija Mbuti & Yoruba & Altai & Chimp 0.660 0.976 0.024
#> 44 m47 Dinka Vindija Yoruba & Altai & Denisova & Chimp 0.612 0.976 0.024
#> 45 m43 Dinka Vindija Mbuti & Yoruba & Altai & Denisova 0.607 0.978 0.022
#> 46 m60 Dinka Altai Mbuti & Yoruba & Vindija & Chimp 0.559 0.974 0.026
#> 47 m62 Dinka Altai Mbuti & Vindija & Denisova & Chimp 0.433 0.975 0.025
#> 48 m45 Dinka Vindija Mbuti & Yoruba & Denisova & Chimp 0.426 0.974 0.026
#> 49 m61 Dinka Altai Mbuti & Yoruba & Denisova & Chimp 0.425 0.974 0.026
#> 50 m46 Dinka Vindija Mbuti & Altai & Denisova & Chimp 0.406 0.977 0.023
#> 51 m75 Dinka Denisova Mbuti & Yoruba & Vindija & Altai 0.196 0.962 0.038
#> 52 m91 Dinka Chimp Mbuti & Yoruba & Vindija & Altai 0.194 0.941 0.059
#> 53 m239 Yoruba Chimp Mbuti & Vindija & Altai & Denisova 0.101 0.988 0.012
#> 54 m93 Dinka Chimp Mbuti & Yoruba & Altai & Denisova 0.0786 0.954 0.046
#> 55 m64 Dinka Altai Mbuti & Yoruba & Vindija & Denisov… 0.629 0.974 0.026
#> 56 m48 Dinka Vindija Mbuti & Yoruba & Altai & Denisova … 0.580 0.976 0.024
Fun fact: notice in the table below that there are many models in which the chimpanzee was fitted as a source of ancestry! Interestingly, qpAdm used Chimp to infer archaic human ancestry. This is because you could think of Neandertal ancestry as an “ancestral component” of a modern human genome and the qpAdm rotation procedure therefore concludes that Chimpanzee is not be an unreasonable surrogate for a source population. Of course, we know there are better sources in our candidates set - we have the archaic humans!
filter(props, source1 == "Chimp" | source2 == "Chimp")
#> # A tibble: 11 x 7
#> model source1 source2 outgroups pvalue prop1 prop2
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 m81 Dinka Chimp Mbuti & Yoruba & Vindija 0.963 0.937 0.063
#> 2 m82 Dinka Chimp Mbuti & Yoruba & Altai 0.959 0.942 0.058
#> 3 m83 Dinka Chimp Mbuti & Yoruba & Denisova 0.712 0.96 0.04
#> 4 m233 Yoruba Chimp Mbuti & Altai & Denisova 0.343 0.988 0.012
#> 5 m232 Yoruba Chimp Mbuti & Vindija & Denisova 0.123 0.986 0.014
#> 6 m231 Yoruba Chimp Mbuti & Vindija & Altai 0.0751 0.98 0.02
#> 7 m84 Dinka Chimp Mbuti & Vindija & Altai 0.0698 0.942 0.058
#> 8 m87 Dinka Chimp Yoruba & Vindija & Altai 0.0608 0.941 0.059
#> 9 m91 Dinka Chimp Mbuti & Yoruba & Vindija & Altai 0.194 0.941 0.059
#> 10 m239 Yoruba Chimp Mbuti & Vindija & Altai & Denisova 0.101 0.988 0.012
#> 11 m93 Dinka Chimp Mbuti & Yoruba & Altai & Denisova 0.0786 0.954 0.046
Another interesting fact: notice that the rotating population procedure selected another plausible model characterizing the ancestry of the French individual. However, this of course doesn't represent Neandertal introgression. What it might possibly represent is left as an exercise for the reader… :)
filter(props, prop1 < 0.9, prop2 < 0.9)
#> # A tibble: 1 x 7
#> model source1 source2 outgroups pvalue prop1 prop2
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 m4 Dinka Mbuti Yoruba & Altai & Denisova 0.0685 0.781 0.219
At this stage of analysis, you would have to decide which of the
models produced by qpAdm_filter() that cannot be immediately
rejected are more reasonable than others and why. Possibly based on
both some prior knowledge and additional statistics (such as the
details information available in the full log output information shown
by loginfo()). You could say that the qpAdm methodology, while
rooted in strong statistics, is from a certain point as much art as it
is science. Interpreting the results and finding the most appropriate
models can be quite a challenge.
Happy modeling and please, do let me know if you discover bugs or missing features. My goal with this tool is to streamline qpAdm model fitting as much as possible and I can do it only with your input.
As a reminder, keep in mind that admixr gives you tools for
filtering SNPs and also grouping samples into populations on the fly!
You can easily process and group samples before plugging them into
qpAdm_rotation()!
Also note that you can use the function loginfo() to examine the
complete log output of any model by specifying the model
identifier. This is helpful not only for debugging purposes but also
for cases when you need a particular statistic in the full qpAdm log
report which is not currently parsed by admixr:
loginfo(fits, "m40")
#> Full output log of qpAdm rotation for model 'm40':
#> ===================================================
#>
#> qpAdm: parameter file: /var/folders/t7/9gjtb6m92flbnp930618vt3r0000gn/T//Rtmpxiy5JE/qpAdm__2051415644.par
#> ### THE INPUT PARAMETERS
#> ##PARAMETER NAME: VALUE
#> genotypename: /var/folders/t7/9gjtb6m92flbnp930618vt3r0000gn/T//Rtmpxiy5JE/snps/snps.geno
#> snpname: /var/folders/t7/9gjtb6m92flbnp930618vt3r0000gn/T//Rtmpxiy5JE/snps/snps.snp
#> indivname: /var/folders/t7/9gjtb6m92flbnp930618vt3r0000gn/T//Rtmpxiy5JE/snps/snps.ind
#> popleft: /var/folders/t7/9gjtb6m92flbnp930618vt3r0000gn/T//Rtmpxiy5JE/qpAdm__2051415644.popleft
#> popright: /var/folders/t7/9gjtb6m92flbnp930618vt3r0000gn/T//Rtmpxiy5JE/qpAdm__2051415644.popright
#> allsnps: YES
#> summary: YES
#> details: YES
#> ## qpAdm version: 1201
#> seed: -553700503
#>
#> left pops:
#> French
#> Dinka
#> Vindija
#>
#> right pops:
#> Yoruba
#> Altai
#> Chimp
#>
#> 0 French 1
#> 1 Dinka 1
#> 2 Vindija 1
#> 3 Yoruba 1
#> 4 Altai 1
#> 5 Chimp 1
#> jackknife block size: 0.050
#> snps: 500000 indivs: 6
#> number of blocks for block jackknife: 547
#> ## ncols: 500000
#> coverage: French 499434
#> coverage: Dinka 499362
#> coverage: Vindija 497544
#> coverage: Yoruba 499246
#> coverage: Altai 497729
#> coverage: Chimp 491273
#> Effective number of blocks: 490.290
#> numsnps used: 500000
#> codimension 1
#> f4info:
#> f4rank: 1 dof: 1 chisq: 0.025 tail: 0.875038438 dofdiff: 3 chisqdiff: -0.025 taildiff: 1
#> B:
#> scale 1.000
#> Altai 1.301
#> Chimp 0.554
#> A:
#> scale 15.252
#> Dinka -0.036
#> Vindija 1.414
#>
#>
#> full rank
#> f4info:
#> f4rank: 2 dof: 0 chisq: 0.000 tail: 1 dofdiff: 1 chisqdiff: 0.025 taildiff: 0.875038438
#> B:
#> scale 421.013 10.787
#> Altai -1.293 1.301
#> Chimp -0.574 0.554
#> A:
#> scale 1.414 1.414
#> Dinka 1.414 0.000
#> Vindija 0.000 1.414
#>
#>
#> best coefficients: 0.975 0.025
#> Jackknife mean: 0.975467965 0.024532035
#> std. errors: 0.005 0.005
#>
#> error covariance (* 1,000,000)
#> 24 -24
#> -24 24
#>
#>
#> summ: French 2 0.875038 0.975 0.025 24 -24 24
#>
#> fixed pat wt dof chisq tail prob
#> 00 0 1 0.025 0.875038 0.975 0.025
#> 01 1 2 24.294 5.30367e-06 1.000 0.000
#> 10 1 2 23181.059 0 0.000 1.000
#> best pat: 00 0.875038 - -
#> best pat: 01 5.30367e-06 chi(nested): 24.269 p-value for nested model: 8.37552e-07
#>
#> coeffs: 0.975 0.025
#>
#> ## dscore:: f_4(Base, Fit, Rbase, right2)
#> ## genstat:: f_4(Base, Fit, right1, right2)
#>
#> details: Dinka Altai -0.003070 -4.407893
#> details: Vindija Altai 0.120642 146.515551
#> dscore: Altai f4: -0.000037 Z: -0.053286
#>
#> details: Dinka Chimp -0.001363 -2.294880
#> details: Vindija Chimp 0.051327 77.922651
#> dscore: Chimp f4: -0.000071 Z: -0.121462
#>
#> gendstat: Yoruba Altai -0.053
#> gendstat: Yoruba Chimp -0.121
#> gendstat: Altai Chimp -0.086
#>
#> ##end of qpAdm: 3.913 seconds cpu 0.000 Mbytes in use
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.