The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
This vignette describes a new feature to BGGM
(2.0.0
) that allows for computing network predictability
for binary and ordinal data. Currently the available option is Bayesian
\(R^2\) (Gelman
et al. 2019).
The first example looks at Binary data, consisting of 1190
observations and 6 variables. The data are called
women_math
and the variable descriptions are provided in
BGGM.
The model is estimated with
and then predictability is computed
r2 <- predictability(fit)
# print
r2
#> BGGM: Bayesian Gaussian Graphical Models
#> ---
#> Metric: Bayes R2
#> Type: binary
#> ---
#> Estimates:
#>
#> Node Post.mean Post.sd Cred.lb Cred.ub
#> 1 0.016 0.012 0.002 0.046
#> 2 0.103 0.023 0.064 0.150
#> 3 0.155 0.030 0.092 0.210
#> 4 0.160 0.021 0.118 0.201
#> 5 0.162 0.022 0.118 0.202
#> 6 0.157 0.028 0.097 0.208
#> ---
There are then two options for plotting. The first is with error
bars, denoting the credible interval (i.e., cred
),
and the second is with a ridgeline plot
In the following, the ptsd
data is used (5-level
Likert). The variable descriptions are provided in
BGGM. This is based on the polychoric partial
correlations, with \(R^2\) computed
from the corresponding correlations (due to the correspondence between
the correlation matrix and multiple regression).
The only change is switching type from "binary
to
ordinal
. One important point is the + 1
. This
is required because for the ordinal approach the first category must be
1 (in ptsd
the first category is coded as 0).
r2 <- predictability(fit)
# print
r2
#> BGGM: Bayesian Gaussian Graphical Models
#> ---
#> Metric: Bayes R2
#> Type: ordinal
#> ---
#> Estimates:
#>
#> Node Post.mean Post.sd Cred.lb Cred.ub
#> 1 0.487 0.049 0.394 0.585
#> 2 0.497 0.047 0.412 0.592
#> 3 0.509 0.047 0.423 0.605
#> 4 0.524 0.049 0.441 0.633
#> 5 0.495 0.047 0.409 0.583
#> 6 0.297 0.043 0.217 0.379
#> 7 0.395 0.045 0.314 0.491
#> 8 0.250 0.042 0.173 0.336
#> 9 0.440 0.048 0.358 0.545
#> 10 0.417 0.044 0.337 0.508
#> 11 0.549 0.048 0.463 0.648
#> 12 0.508 0.048 0.423 0.607
#> 13 0.504 0.047 0.421 0.600
#> 14 0.485 0.043 0.411 0.568
#> 15 0.442 0.045 0.355 0.528
#> 16 0.332 0.039 0.257 0.414
#> 17 0.331 0.045 0.259 0.436
#> 18 0.423 0.044 0.345 0.510
#> 19 0.438 0.044 0.354 0.525
#> 20 0.362 0.043 0.285 0.454
#> ---
Here is the error_bar
plot.
Note that the plot object is a ggplot
which allows for
further customization (e.g,. adding the variable names, a title,
etc.).
It is quite common to compute predictability assuming that the data are Gaussian. In the context of Bayesian GGMs, this was introduced in (Williams 2018). This can also be implemented in BGGM.
type
is missing which indicates that
continuous
is the default.
\(R^2\) for binary and ordinal data
is computed for the underlying latent variables. This is also the case
when type = "mixed
(a semi-parametric copula). In future
releases, there will be support for predicting the variables on the
observed scale.
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.