The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
The R
package BDgraph provides
statistical tools for Bayesian structure learning for undirected
graphical models with continuous, count,
binary, and mixed data. The package is implemented the
recent improvements in the Bayesian graphical models’ literature,
including Mohammadi and Wit
(2015), Mohammadi et
al. (2023), Mohammadi
et al. (2017), Dobra and
Mohammadi (2018), Mohammadi et al. (2023), and
Vinciotti et
al. (2022). Besides, the package contains several functions for
simulation and visualization, as well as several multivariate datasets
taken from the literature.
Install BDgraph using
First, we load BDgraph package
Here are two simple examples to show how to use the functionality of the package.
Here is a simple example to see the performance of the package for
the Gaussian graphical models. First, by using the function
bdgraph.sim()
, we simulate 200 observations (n = 200) from
a multivariate Gaussian distribution with 15 variables (p = 15) and
“scale-free” graph structure, as follows
Since the generated data are Gaussian, we run the
bdgraph()
function by choosing method = "ggm"
,
as follows
To report confusion matrix with cutoff point 0.5:
conf.mat( actual = data.sim, pred = bdgraph.obj, cutoff = 0.5 )
Actual
Prediction 0 1
0 91 4
1 0 10
conf.mat.plot( actual = data.sim, pred = bdgraph.obj, cutoff = 0.5 )
To compare the result with the true graph
Target BDgraph
True Positive 10 10.000
True Negative 95 91.000
False Positive 0 4.000
False Negative 0 0.000
F1-score 1 0.833
Specificity 1 0.958
Sensitivity 1 1.000
MCC 1 0.827
Now, as an alternative, we run the bdgraph.mpl()
function which is based on the GGMs and marginal pseudo-likelihood, as
follows
bdgraph.mpl.obj = bdgraph.mpl( data = data.sim, method = "ggm", iter = 5000, verbose = FALSE )
conf.mat( actual = data.sim, pred = bdgraph.mpl.obj )
Actual
Prediction 0 1
0 91 4
1 0 10
conf.mat.plot( actual = data.sim, pred = bdgraph.mpl.obj )
We could compare the results of both algorithms with the true graph as follows
compare( list( bdgraph.obj, bdgraph.mpl.obj ), data.sim,
main = c( "Target", "BDgraph", "BDgraph.mpl" ), vis = TRUE )
Target BDgraph BDgraph.mpl
True Positive 14 10.000 10.000
True Negative 91 91.000 91.000
False Positive 0 0.000 0.000
False Negative 0 4.000 4.000
F1-score 1 0.833 0.833
Specificity 1 1.000 1.000
Sensitivity 1 0.714 0.714
MCC 1 0.827 0.827
To see the performance of the BDMCMC algorithm we could plot the ROC curve as follows
Here is a simple example to see the performance of the package for
the mixed data using Gaussian copula graphical models. First, by using
the function bdgraph.sim()
, we simulate 300 observations (n
= 300) from mixed data (type = "mixed"
) with 10 variables
(p = 10) and “random” graph structure, as follows
set.seed( 2 )
data.sim = bdgraph.sim( n = 300, p = 10, type = "mixed", graph = "random", vis = TRUE )
Since the generated data are mixed data, we are using run the
bdgraph()
function by choosing
method = "gcgm"
, as follows:
To compare the result with the true graph, we could run
Target BDgraph
True Positive 12 9.000
True Negative 33 31.000
False Positive 0 2.000
False Negative 0 3.000
F1-score 1 0.783
Specificity 1 0.939
Sensitivity 1 0.750
MCC 1 0.709
For more examples see Mohammadi and Wit (2019).
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.