CRAN Package Check Results for Maintainer ‘Ching-Wei Cheng <aks43725 at gmail.com>’

Last updated on 2024-05-02 08:02:15 CEST.

Package NOTE OK
rBeta2009 9 3

Package rBeta2009

Current CRAN status: NOTE: 9, OK: 3

Additional issues

noRemap

Version: 1.0
Check: Rd files
Result: NOTE checkRd: (-1) rbeta.Rd:31-32: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) rbeta.Rd:34: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? checkRd: (-1) rbeta.Rd:35-37: Lost braces in \itemize; meant \describe ? Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-release-linux-x86_64, r-release-macos-arm64, r-release-windows-x86_64

Version: 1.0
Check: Rd cross-references
Result: NOTE Undeclared packages ‘MCMCpack’, ‘gtools’ in Rd xrefs Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang

Version: 1.0
Check: compiled code
Result: NOTE File ‘rBeta2009/libs/rBeta2009.so’: Found no calls to: ‘R_registerRoutines’, ‘R_useDynamicSymbols’ It is good practice to register native routines and to disable symbol search. See ‘Writing portable packages’ in the ‘Writing R Extensions’ manual. Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc

These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.