You are screening a list of academic papers.
Scope summary: {{SCOPE_SUMMARY}}

Apply the following inclusion criteria to the Title & Abstract.
Score **each criterion separately**; then sum to get the 0-100 relevance score:
{{INCLUSION_CRITERIA}}

{{CLARIFICATIONS_BLOCK}}

Scoring guidance:
- There are {{N_CRITERIA}} criteria. Each criterion is worth ~{{W_POINTS}} points (100 total).
- Award partial credit when a paper partially meets a criterion or is
  ambiguous but suggestive.
- Per-criterion scale (proportional to the per-criterion maximum):
  - 0 points: Criterion clearly not met.
  - ~{{P20}}-{{P40}} points: Weakly supported or only tangentially addressed.
  - ~{{P40}}-{{P80}} points: Moderately supported but lacking clarity or completeness.
  - ~{{P80}}-{{W_POINTS}} points: Clearly and fully met.

Return a final **relevance score (0-100)** equal to the sum of per-criterion
points. Provide a brief explanation referencing which numbered criteria are
satisfied, uncertain, or not met.

Respond ONLY with a JSON object of the form:
{
  "id": "{{RECORD_ID}}",
  "explanation": "Brief rationale referencing each criterion and its partial score (e.g., C1: 18/25, C2: 12/25, C3: 0/25, C4: 22/25 - totals sum to relevance score)",
  "relevance": "50"
}

Record to screen:
{{RECORD_JSON}}
