This document describe a toy example for the use of the package systemicrisk.
library(systemicrisk)
Suppose we observe the following vector of total liabilities and todal assets.
l <- c(714,745,246, 51,847)
a <- c(872, 412, 65, 46,1208)
The following sets up a model for 5 banks:
mod <- Model.additivelink.exponential.fitness(n=5,alpha=-2.5,beta=0.3,gamma=1.0,
lambdaprior=Model.fitness.genlambdaparprior(ratescale=500))
Choosing thinning to ensure sample is equivalent to number of
thin <- choosethin(l=l,a=a,model=mod,silent=TRUE)
## Warning in findFeasibleMatrix_targetmean(l, a, p = u$p, targetmean =
## mean(genL(model)$L > : Desired mean degree is less than minimal degree that
## is necessary.
## Warning in findFeasibleMatrix_targetmean(l, a, p = u$p, targetmean =
## mean(genL(model)$L > : Desired mean degree is less than minimal degree that
## is necessary.
## Warning in findFeasibleMatrix_targetmean(l, a, p = u$p, targetmean =
## mean(genL(model)$L > : Desired mean degree is less than minimal degree that
## is necessary.
thin
## [1] 100
Running the sampler to produce 1000 samples.
res <- sample_HierarchicalModel(l=l,a=a,model=mod,nsamples=1e3,thin=thin,silent=TRUE)
## Warning in findFeasibleMatrix_targetmean(l, a, p = u$p, targetmean =
## mean(genL(model)$L > : Desired mean degree is less than minimal degree that
## is necessary.
Some examples of the matrics generated are below.
res$L[[1]]
## [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]
## [1,] 0.0000 53.70097 0 35.70916 624.5899
## [2,] 458.5899 0.00000 0 0.00000 286.4101
## [3,] 0.0000 0.00000 0 0.00000 246.0000
## [4,] 0.0000 0.00000 0 0.00000 51.0000
## [5,] 413.4101 358.29903 65 10.29084 0.0000
res$L[[2]]
## [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]
## [1,] 0.00000 402.164591 18.11894 0 293.71647
## [2,] 57.85261 0.000000 0.00000 46 641.14739
## [3,] 0.00000 0.000000 0.00000 0 246.00000
## [4,] 23.86386 0.000000 0.00000 0 27.13614
## [5,] 790.28353 9.835409 46.88106 0 0.00000
The sampler produces samples from the conditional distribution of matrix and parameter values given the observed data. To see the posterior distribution of the liabilities of Bank 1 towards Bank 2:
plot(ecdf(sapply(res$L,function(x)x[1,2])))
All the caveats of MCMC algorithms apply. In particular the samples are dependent.
Some automatic diagnostic can be generated via the function diagnose.
diagnose(res)
## Analysis does not consider 5 entries of matrix
## that are deterministic (diagonal elements, row/column sum=0 or forced result).
## All remaining elements of the liabilities matrix have moved during sample run.
## ESS in matrix:
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
## 723.0 818.3 1000.0 922.1 1000.0 1135.0
## ESS in theta:
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
## 540.3 748.1 865.6 839.2 986.1 1000.0
Trace plots of individual liabilities also shoud show rapid mixing - as seems to be the case for the liabilities of Bank 1 towards Bank 2.
plot(sapply(res$L,function(x)x[1,2]),type="b")
Trace plot of the fitness of bank 1.
plot(res$theta[1,],type="b")
Also, the autocorrelation function should decline quickly. Again, considering the liabilities between bank 1 and bank 2:
acf(sapply(res$L,function(x)x[1,2]))
In this case it decays quickly below the white-noise threshold (the horizontal dashed lines).