Metabolite simulation

Simple simulation

Load the spant package:

library(spant)

Output a list of pre-defined molecules available for simulation:

get_mol_names()
#>  [1] "2hg"      "a_glc"    "ace"      "ala"      "asc"      "asp"     
#>  [7] "b_glc"    "bhb"      "cho"      "cit"      "cr_ch2"   "cr_ch3"  
#> [13] "cr"       "gaba_jn"  "gaba"     "gaba_rt"  "glc"      "gln"     
#> [19] "glu"      "glu_rt"   "gly"      "glyc"     "gpc"      "gsh"     
#> [25] "ins"      "ins_rt"   "lac"      "lac_rt"   "lip09"    "lip13a"  
#> [31] "lip13b"   "lip20"    "m_cr_ch2" "mm09"     "mm12"     "mm14"    
#> [37] "mm17"     "mm20"     "mm_3t"    "msm"      "naa2"     "naa"     
#> [43] "naa_rt"   "naag_ch3" "naag"     "pch"      "pcr"      "peth"    
#> [49] "ser"      "sins"     "suc"      "tau"

Get and print the spin system for myo-inositol:

ins <- get_mol_paras("ins")
print(ins)
#> Name        : Ins
#> Full name   : myo-Inositol
#> Spin groups : 1
#> Source      : Proton NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants for brain
#>               metabolites. NMR Biomed. 2000; 13:129-153.
#> 
#> Spin group 1
#> ------------
#> Scaling factor : 1
#> Linewidth (Hz) : 0.5
#> L/G lineshape  : 0
#> 
#>   nucleus chem_shift
#> 1      1H     3.5217
#> 2      1H     4.0538
#> 3      1H     3.5217
#> 4      1H     3.6144
#> 5      1H     3.2690
#> 6      1H     3.6144
#> 
#> j-coupling matrix
#>        3.5217 4.0538 3.5217 3.6144 3.269 3.6144
#> 3.5217      -      -      -      -     -      -
#> 4.0538  2.889      -      -      -     -      -
#> 3.5217      -  3.006      -      -     -      -
#> 3.6144      -      -  9.997      -     -      -
#> 3.269       -      -      -  9.485     -      -
#> 3.6144  9.998      -      -      - 9.482      -

Simulate and plot the simulation at 7 Tesla for a pulse acquire sequence (seq_pulse_acquire), apply 2 Hz line-broadening and plot.

sim_mol(ins, ft = 300e6, N = 4096) %>% lb(2) %>% plot(xlim = c(3.8, 3.1))

Other pulse sequences may be simulated including: seq_cpmg_ideal, seq_mega_press_ideal, seq_press_ideal, seq_slaser_ideal, seq_spin_echo_ideal, seq_steam_ideal. Note all these sequences assume chemical shift displacement is negligible. Next we simulate a 30 ms spin-echo sequence and plot:

ins_sim <- sim_mol(ins, seq_spin_echo_ideal, ft = 300e6, N = 4086, TE = 0.03)
ins_sim %>% lb(2) %>% plot(xlim = c(3.8, 3.1))

Finally we simulate a range of echo-times and plot all results together to see the phase evolution:

sim_fn <- function(TE) {
  te_sim <- sim_mol(ins, seq_spin_echo_ideal, ft = 300e6, N = 4086, TE = TE)
  lb(te_sim, 2)
}

te_vals <- seq(0, 2, 0.4)

lapply(te_vals, sim_fn) %>% stackplot(y_offset = 150, xlim = c(3.8, 3.1),
                                      labels = paste(te_vals * 100, "ms"))

See the basis simulation vignette for how to combine these simulations into a basis set for MRS analysis.

Custom molecules

For simple signals that do not require j-coupling evolution, for example singlets or approximations to macromolecule or lipid resonances, the get_uncoupled_mol function may be used. In this example we simulated two broad Gaussian resonances at 1.3 and 1.4 ppm with differing amplitudes:

get_uncoupled_mol("Lip13", c(1.3, 1.4), c("1H", "1H"), c(2, 1), c(10, 10),
                  c(1, 1)) %>% sim_mol %>% plot(xlim = c(2, 0.8))

Molecules that aren’t defined within spant, or need adjusting to match a particular scan, may be manually defined by constructing a mol_parameters object. In the following code we define an imaginary molecule based on Lactate, with the addition of a second spin group containing a singlet at 2.5 ppm. Whilst this molecule could be defined as a single group, it is more computationally efficient to split non j-coupled spin systems up in this way. Note the lineshape is set to a Lorentzian (Lorentz-Gauss factor lg = 0) with a width of 2 Hz. It is generally a good idea to simulate resonances with narrower lineshapes that you expect to see in experimental data, as it is far easier to make a resonance broader than narrower.

nucleus_a <- rep("1H", 4)

chem_shift_a <- c(4.0974, 1.3142, 1.3142, 1.3142)

j_coupling_mat_a <- matrix(0, 4, 4)
j_coupling_mat_a[2,1] <- 6.933
j_coupling_mat_a[3,1] <- 6.933
j_coupling_mat_a[4,1] <- 6.933

spin_group_a <- list(nucleus = nucleus_a, chem_shift = chem_shift_a, 
                     j_coupling_mat = j_coupling_mat_a, scale_factor = 1,
                     lw = 2, lg = 0)

nucleus_b <- c("1H")
chem_shift_b <- c(2.5)
j_coupling_mat_b <- matrix(0, 1, 1)

spin_group_b <- list(nucleus = nucleus_b, chem_shift = chem_shift_b, 
                     j_coupling_mat = j_coupling_mat_b, scale_factor = 3,
                     lw = 2, lg = 0)

source <- "This text should include a reference on the origin of the chemical shift and j-coupling values."

custom_mol <- list(spin_groups = list(spin_group_a, spin_group_b), name = "Cus",
              source = source, full_name = "Custom molecule")

class(custom_mol) <- "mol_parameters"

In the next step we output the molecule definition as formatted text and plot it.

print(custom_mol)
#> Name        : Cus
#> Full name   : Custom molecule
#> Spin groups : 2
#> Source      : This text should include a reference on the origin of the chemical shift and j-coupling values.
#> 
#> Spin group 1
#> ------------
#> Scaling factor : 1
#> Linewidth (Hz) : 2
#> L/G lineshape  : 0
#> 
#>   nucleus chem_shift
#> 1      1H     4.0974
#> 2      1H     1.3142
#> 3      1H     1.3142
#> 4      1H     1.3142
#> 
#> j-coupling matrix
#>        4.0974 1.3142 1.3142 1.3142
#> 4.0974      -      -      -      -
#> 1.3142  6.933      -      -      -
#> 1.3142  6.933      -      -      -
#> 1.3142  6.933      -      -      -
#> 
#> Spin group 2
#> ------------
#> Scaling factor : 3
#> Linewidth (Hz) : 2
#> L/G lineshape  : 0
#> 
#>   nucleus chem_shift
#> 1      1H        2.5
custom_mol %>% sim_mol %>% lb(2) %>% zf %>% plot(xlim = c(4.4, 0.5))

Once your happy the new molecule is correct, please consider contributing it to the package if you think others would benefit.