The limitations of linear correlation are well known. Often one uses correlation, when dependence is the intended measure for defining the relationship between variables. NNS dependence NNS.dep
is a signal:noise measure robust to nonlinear signals.
Below are some examples comparing NNS correlation NNS.cor
and NNS.dep
with the standard Pearson’s correlation coefficient cor
.
Note the fact that all observations occupy the co-partial moment quadrants.
x=seq(0,3,.01); y=2*x
cor(x,y)
## [1] 1
NNS.dep(x,y,print.map = T,order=3)
## $Correlation
## [1] 1
##
## $Dependence
## [1] 1
Note the fact that all observations occupy the co-partial moment quadrants.
x=seq(0,3,.01); y=x^10
cor(x,y)
## [1] 0.6610183
NNS.dep(x,y,print.map = T,order=3)
## $Correlation
## [1] 0.9699069
##
## $Dependence
## [1] 0.9699069
Note the fact that all observations occupy only co- or divergent partial moment quadrants for a given subquadrant.
set.seed(123)
df<- data.frame(x=runif(10000,-1,1),y=runif(10000,-1,1))
df<- subset(df, (x^2 + y^2 <= 1 & x^2 + y^2 >= 0.95))
NNS.dep(df$x,df$y,print.map = T)
## $Correlation
## [1] -0.007630343
##
## $Dependence
## [1] 0.9963612
If the user is so motivated, detailed arguments and proofs are provided within the following:
*Nonlinear Nonparametric Statistics: Using Partial Moments
*Nonlinear Correlation and Dependence Using NNS
*Deriving Nonlinear Correlation Coefficients from Partial Moments
*Beyond Correlation: Using the Elements of Variance for Conditional Means and Probabilities