MAIVE (Meta-Analysis Instrumental Variable Estimator) addresses a fundamental problem in meta-analysis of observational research: spurious precision. Traditional meta-analysis assigns more weight to studies with lower standard errors, assuming higher precision. However, in observational research, precision must be estimated and is vulnerable to manipulation through practices like p-hacking to achieve statistical significance.
For a guided, interactive workflow, visit https://www.easymeta.org.
This manipulation can invalidate:
MAIVE introduces an instrumental variable approach to limit bias caused by spurious precision in meta-analysis.
In observational research, researchers can inadvertently or deliberately manipulate their analyses to achieve statistically significant results. This includes:
These practices create spuriously precise estimates that appear more reliable than they actually are. Traditional meta-analysis methods that weight by inverse variance will overweight these manipulated studies, leading to biased conclusions.
MAIVE uses instrumental variables to correct for spurious precision:
This approach provides:
The maive() function accepts either the default column
names or custom mappings:
| Column | Default name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Estimate | bs |
Primary estimates (effect sizes) |
| Std. Error | sebs |
Standard errors (must be > 0) |
| Sample size | Ns |
Sample sizes (must be > 0) |
| Study ID (optional) | study_id |
Clustering/fixed effects identifier |
Custom column names: You can map your own column names using:
estimate for the estimate columnse for the standard error columnn for the sample size columnstudy_id for study identifiers (optional)Example:
custom_dat <- data.frame(
my_est = c(0.50, 0.60, 0.40, 0.55, 0.45, 0.52, 0.48, 0.58, 0.42, 0.50, 0.47, 0.56),
my_se = c(0.20, 0.18, 0.25, 0.22, 0.24, 0.19, 0.23, 0.17, 0.26, 0.21, 0.24, 0.18),
my_n = c(80, 120, 95, 110, 90, 130, 100, 140, 85, 105, 88, 125),
my_study = c("A", "A", "B", "B", "C", "C", "D", "D", "A", "B", "C", "D")
)
result <- maive(
dat = custom_dat,
estimate = "my_est",
se = "my_se",
n = "my_n",
study_id = "my_study",
method = 3,
weight = 0,
instrument = 1,
studylevel = 2,
SE = 3,
AR = 1
)
#> Registered S3 method overwritten by 'clubSandwich':
#> method from
#> bread.mlm sandwich
result$beta
#> [1] 0.7628903Validation rules still apply: required columns must be numeric, non-missing, finite, and there must be at least 4 observations after removing completely empty rows. With a study identifier, there must be at least as many rows as unique studies plus three (the fixture above has 12 rows for 4 studies).
Study identifier fallback: when
study_id is not supplied, a column named
study_id is used wherever it sits. If there is no such
column and the data frame has four or more columns, the fourth column is
used as the study identifier and a warning names it. If column four is a
moderator or a year rather than a study identifier, drop it or name the
correct column explicitly, because the identifier drives the study
dummies and clustering at every studylevel other than
0.
Coming from metafor: if your effect sizes are
already in a metafor::escalc() data frame or an
rma() fit, maive_from_metafor() builds this
data frame for you. It uses sqrt(vi) as the standard error
and takes the sample sizes from the object (ni, the
ni attribute that escalc() records, or
n1i + n2i), never inferring them from the variance. Rows of
an rma.uni fit pass through the fit’s subset
and missing-value masks, so a study_id vector for the
original data stays aligned.
smd <- metafor::escalc(
measure = "SMD",
m1i = c(2.1, 2.5, 1.9, 2.4, 2.2, 2.6, 2.3, 2.0),
sd1i = c(1.0, 1.2, 0.9, 1.1, 1.0, 1.3, 1.1, 1.0),
n1i = c(40, 50, 30, 45, 60, 35, 55, 48),
m2i = c(1.8, 2.0, 1.7, 2.1, 1.9, 2.2, 2.0, 1.8),
sd2i = c(1.0, 1.1, 1.0, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.0, 1.1),
n2i = c(42, 55, 33, 48, 58, 37, 52, 50)
)
maive_from_metafor(smd)
#> bs sebs Ns
#> 1 0.2971772 0.2221442 82
#> 2 0.4321116 0.1976638 105
#> 3 0.2071041 0.2529363 63
#> 4 0.2834756 0.2085368 93
#> 5 0.2837736 0.1850656 118
#> 6 0.3166657 0.2372653 72
#> 7 0.2829629 0.1943881 107
#> 8 0.1885831 0.2025211 98Let’s create a simple example dataset:
# Simulated meta-analysis data: 50 estimates from 10 studies, with reported
# precision driven by sample size (as the first stage assumes)
set.seed(123)
n_estimates <- 50
Ns <- sample(100:1000, n_estimates, replace = TRUE)
data <- data.frame(
bs = rnorm(n_estimates, mean = 0.3, sd = 0.2),
sebs = 2 / sqrt(Ns) * runif(n_estimates, min = 0.8, max = 1.2),
Ns = Ns,
study_id = rep(1:10, each = 5)
)
head(data)
#> bs sebs Ns study_id
#> 1 0.2409857 0.09350867 514 1
#> 2 0.4790251 0.08013701 562 1
#> 3 0.4756267 0.11301618 278 1
#> 4 0.4643162 0.08107801 625 1
#> 5 0.4377281 0.12785564 294 1
#> 6 0.4107835 0.05867782 917 2The default MAIVE estimator uses PET-PEESE with instrumented standard errors, no weights, cluster-robust standard errors, and wild bootstrap:
# Run MAIVE with defaults
result <- maive(
dat = data,
method = 3, # PET-PEESE (default)
weight = 0, # No weights (default)
instrument = 1, # Instrument SEs (default)
studylevel = 2, # Cluster-robust (default)
SE = 3, # Wild bootstrap (default)
AR = 1 # Anderson-Rubin CI (default)
)
# View key results
cat("MAIVE Estimate:", round(result$beta, 3), "\n")
#> MAIVE Estimate: 0.335
cat("MAIVE SE:", round(result$SE, 3), "\n")
#> MAIVE SE: 0.05
cat("Standard Estimate:", round(result$beta_standard, 3), "\n")
#> Standard Estimate: 0.348
cat("Hausman Test:", round(result$Hausman, 3), "\n")
#> Hausman Test: 0.001
cat("First-stage F-test:", round(result$`F-test`, 3), "\n")
#> First-stage F-test: 373.181The maive() function returns a list with the following
key elements (see ?maive for the full list):
beta: MAIVE point estimate (corrected for spurious
precision)SE: MAIVE standard errorbeta_standard, SE_standard: Conventional
(non-IV) estimate and standard error for comparisonHausman: Hausman-type test comparing IV vs OLS
estimates (high value suggests spurious precision)F-test: First-stage F-test of instrument strengthAR_CI: Anderson-Rubin confidence interval (robust to
weak instruments)pub bias p-value: p-value for the publication bias test
based on the instrumented FATSE_instrumented: Vector of instrumented standard
errorspetpeese_selected: Which of PET and PEESE was selected
when method = 3ek_structure: Structure of the EK fit when
method = 4 (“kink”, “linear”, or “intercept”)MAIVE supports multiple meta-regression methods:
PET-PEESE uses PET if the PET estimate is not significantly different from zero, otherwise uses PEESE:
Unweighted regression, recommended when spurious precision is a concern:
Traditional meta-analysis weighting:
Control for study-level correlation when you have multiple estimates per study:
# No study-level adjustment
result_none <- maive(data, method = 3, weight = 0, instrument = 1,
studylevel = 0, SE = 0, AR = 1)
# Study fixed effects (demeaned)
result_fe <- maive(data, method = 3, weight = 0, instrument = 1,
studylevel = 1, SE = 1, AR = 0) # AR not available with FE
# Cluster-robust standard errors
result_cluster <- maive(data, method = 3, weight = 0, instrument = 1,
studylevel = 2, SE = 3, AR = 1)
# Both fixed effects and clustering
result_both <- maive(data, method = 3, weight = 0, instrument = 1,
studylevel = 3, SE = 3, AR = 0)# CR0 (Huber-White)
result_cr0 <- maive(data, method = 3, weight = 0, instrument = 1,
studylevel = 2, SE = 0, AR = 1)
# CR1 (Standard empirical correction)
result_cr1 <- maive(data, method = 3, weight = 0, instrument = 1,
studylevel = 2, SE = 1, AR = 1)
# CR2 (Bias-reduced estimator)
result_cr2 <- maive(data, method = 3, weight = 0, instrument = 1,
studylevel = 2, SE = 2, AR = 1)
# Wild bootstrap (recommended, default)
result_boot <- maive(data, method = 3, weight = 0, instrument = 1,
studylevel = 2, SE = 3, AR = 1)MAIVE allows two functional forms for the first-stage regression:
Regresses variance (sebs²) on constant and 1/Ns:
WAIVE (Weighted Adjusted Instrumental Variable Estimator) provides a more aggressive correction for p-hacking and spurious precision by combining variance instrumentation with exponential-decay downweighting of studies with spurious precision or extreme outliers:
For technical details and methodology, see the WAIVE slides.
result_waive <- waive(
dat = data,
method = 3,
weight = 0,
instrument = 1,
studylevel = 2,
SE = 3,
AR = 1
)
cat("WAIVE Estimate:", round(result_waive$beta, 3), "\n")
cat("WAIVE SE:", round(result_waive$SE, 3), "\n")WAIVE is particularly useful when:
The Hausman test compares the MAIVE (IV) estimate with the standard (OLS) estimate:
Tests the strength of the instrument (inverse sample size):
Provides inference robust to weak instruments. Always check this CI when F-test is low.
Tests for publication bias using instrumented FAT:
Irsova, Z., Bom, P.R.D., Havranek, T., & Rachinger, H. (2025). Spurious precision in meta-analysis of observational research. Nature Communications, 16, 8454. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63261-0
Keane, M., & Neal, T. (2023). Instrument strength in IV estimation and inference: A guide to theory and practice. Journal of Econometrics, 235(2), 1625-1653.
?maive for detailed parameter documentation?waive for the robust WAIVE estimator