inst/benchmarks/run-benchmark.R reproduces a benchmark
of fastgbm against gbm, xgboost,
and ranger on six real survival datasets from the
biostatlab package (pbc,
heart_failure, breast,
colon_cancer, crc_mondaca2020,
framingham), under an equal-hyperparameter-grid regime with
repeated 70/30 train/test splits.
This writes, under inst/benchmarks/:
benchmark-results.csv – one row per (dataset, model,
repeat), with training time, prediction time, and Harrell’s
C-index;benchmark-summary.csv – median/IQR per (dataset,
model), plus paired win/loss/tie counts of fastgbm against
each competitor;parallel-speedup.csv – threads = 1
vs. threads = <hardware concurrency> training time on
the largest dataset (framingham);session-info.txt – R/package versions, OS, seed, and
hyperparameters, for reproducibility.The full write-up, with tables and figures generated directly from
these CSVs, is in paper/fastgbm-benchmark.qmd (renders to
fastgbm-benchmark.pdf via quarto render).
Results are reported honestly (win/loss/tie per dataset), not as a
universal superiority claim – see the paper’s Comparative Summary
section.