The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
Concreteness has long been central to psychological theories of learning and thinking, and increasingly has practical applications to domains with prevalent natural language data, like advice and plan-making. However, the literature provides diffuse and competing definitions of concreteness in natural language. In this package, we codify simple guidelines for automated concreteness detection within and across domains, developed from a review of existing methods in the literature.
You can install the doc2concrete package directly, like so:
This package is built as an accompaniment to Yeomans (2020). Here, we operationalize models of document-level concreteness based on a survey of datasets in several domains, including advice. We offer two applications. First, we provide pre-trained models specifically tuned to measure concreteness in two open-ended goal pursuit domains - advice and plan-making. These were developed using supervised machine learning tools, and robustly outperform other domain-specific models. We trained the advice model across a range of datasets from lab and field settings (9 studies, 4,608 students), and we trained the plan-making model from plans students wrote at the beginning of online classes (7 classes, 5,172 students). Second, we provide an open-domain model based on a word-level concreteness dictionary in Byrsbaert, Warriner & Kuperman (2014). While the open domain model did seem relatively robust in our research, we also found substantial variation in concreteness within and across domains. We provide this open-domain model as a scaleable starting point for researchers interested in concreteness in other domains. However, we highly recommend that researchers conduct deeper work to better understand their own domain-specific model of concreteness.
library(doc2concrete)
cor.test(doc2concrete(feedback_dat$feedback,domain="open"),
feedback_dat$concrete)
cor.test(doc2concrete(feedback_dat$feedback,domain="advice"),
feedback_dat$concrete)Yeomans, M. (2021). A concrete example of construct construction in natural language. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 162, 81-94.
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904-911.
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.