The hardware and bandwidth for this mirror is donated by dogado GmbH, the Webhosting and Full Service-Cloud Provider. Check out our Wordpress Tutorial.
If you wish to report a bug, or if you are interested in having us mirror your free-software or open-source project, please feel free to contact us at mirror[@]dogado.de.
Exogenous information — such as geographic distance between actors —
can drive the rate at which relational events occur. amorem
supports this through the contribution_logits argument of
simulate_relational_events(), which accepts any sender ×
receiver matrix of log-intensities.
The package ships a 56 × 56 distance matrix (in metres) between US states and territories. We load it and transform to a log-scale:
Following the issue description, the true effect of distance on the log-rate is a smooth, non-linear function:
\[f(d) = \sin\!\bigl(-d / 1.5\bigr)\]
where \(d\) is the log-transformed distance.
We can visualise this curve:
d_seq <- seq(0, max(dist_log), length.out = 200)
plot(d_seq, sin(-d_seq / 1.5),
type = "l", lwd = 2, col = "red",
xlab = "log-distance", ylab = "f(d)",
main = "True non-linear distance effect"
)We pass the effect matrix directly as
contribution_logits. The Gillespie algorithm uses these
values to weight which dyad fires next. We also request one control per
event for downstream inference:
set.seed(42)
states <- rownames(dist_matrix)
events <- simulate_relational_events(
n_events = 800,
senders = states,
receivers = states,
contribution_logits = true_effect,
allow_loops = FALSE,
n_controls = 1
)
head(events)
#> stratum event sender receiver time
#> 1 1 1 Texas Maryland 0.0001203087
#> 2 1 0 North Carolina Pennsylvania 0.0001203087
#> 3 2 1 Oregon Wisconsin 0.0001434754
#> 4 2 0 District of Columbia Kansas 0.0001434754
#> 5 3 1 Idaho Kentucky 0.0003339346
#> 6 3 0 Delaware Colorado 0.0003339346For each event–control pair we compute the
difference in log-distance. A GAM with a smooth term
s(delta_dist) should recover the true curve.
library(mgcv)
get_dist <- function(s, r) {
dist_log[cbind(match(s, states), match(r, states))]
}
events$dist_val <- mapply(get_dist, events$sender, events$receiver)
cases <- events[events$event == 1, ]
controls <- events[events$event == 0, ]
cases <- cases[order(cases$stratum), ]
controls <- controls[order(controls$stratum), ]
fit_df <- data.frame(
y = 1,
delta_dist = cases$dist_val - controls$dist_val
)
fit <- gam(y ~ s(delta_dist) - 1, family = binomial, data = fit_df)
summary(fit)
#>
#> Family: binomial
#> Link function: logit
#>
#> Formula:
#> y ~ s(delta_dist) - 1
#>
#> Approximate significance of smooth terms:
#> edf Ref.df Chi.sq p-value
#> s(delta_dist) 1 1 0 1
#>
#> R-sq.(adj) = NaN Deviance explained = -Inf%
#> UBRE = 0.38879 Scale est. = 1 n = 800x_grid <- seq(min(fit_df$delta_dist), max(fit_df$delta_dist), length.out = 300)
pred <- predict(fit, newdata = data.frame(delta_dist = x_grid), type = "link")
plot(x_grid, pred,
type = "l", lwd = 2,
xlab = expression(Delta ~ "log-distance"),
ylab = "Estimated effect",
main = "GAM-recovered smooth vs true effect"
)
abline(h = 0, lty = 2, col = "grey50")The GAM successfully captures the non-linear relationship between
distance and event intensity, demonstrating that amorem
handles exogenous dyadic covariates seamlessly through
contribution_logits.
These binaries (installable software) and packages are in development.
They may not be fully stable and should be used with caution. We make no claims about them.
Health stats visible at Monitor.